What Movie Did You Just Watch? - Shh! It's Starting!

Discussion of non-Disney entertainment.
Locked
User avatar
SmartAleck25
Special Edition
Posts: 671
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: The U.S.

Post by SmartAleck25 »

Toy Story 2 (1999)- 9/10
My opinion of this movie is better. Jessie does not come off as annoying to me as before. Woody's plight is more understandable for me. I also noticed things I somehow didn't notice when I was watching it before. Like Imposter Buzz throwing the tennis ball around with Zurg (too bad Vader and Luke never got around to that :wink: ), and Woody scraping off the coat of painting that Geri put on his boot. The animation was rich and colorful, naturally surpassing Toy Story's visuals. The tiles in Al's Toy Barn look real, and the road is believable. I like how in both movies, the toys in some hilarious way cause car/traffic accidents. Now, about the bad things. Al is repulsive, disgusting, and not at all a suitable villain. His character is weak, and his presence is not at all threatening (compare him to Hopper, or even AUTO). Prospector Pete is more dangerous than him, and he's a toy! Also, for some reason, I felt like this movie went by much quicker than the first. I felt like Toy Story 2 had much more to tell. Which is ironic, considering it's longer by about 10 minutes. But, those few things don't stop Toy Story 2 from being another instant Pixar classic, if not the best of their creations. Unfortunately, I must disagree with Aaron, and Entertainment Weekly (the magazine that wrote that age-old comment used in about every TS2 trailer: "The Rare Sequel that Lives Up to Its Predecessor!"), for Toy Story 2 is not better than Toy Story (in my opinion, at least). I know others think differently, but for now, the first one is higher up on my list.
Image
User avatar
Kyle
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3550
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:47 pm

Post by Kyle »

I think your looking at it all wrong. AL isn't meant to be the main villain like Sid or Hopper, he's just a way of presenting the bigger question for woody, should he stay or go. Your right about the prospector being more threatening, but him being the bad guy only worked because it was a twist no one saw coming. and you acutally sympathize with him and his story. Hopper is pretty 2 dimensional when you think about it. His evilness is based on laziness more than anything.
User avatar
jpanimation
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1841
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:00 am

Post by jpanimation »

How to Train Your Dragon (2010) 7/10 - nice direction for Dreamworks to be heading in. The lack of pop culture references is a plus and the story felt a little more serious then their recent crop of crap. The animation is pretty good, especially considering the time crunch they were on, and the 3D was some of the best I've ever experienced (used far better then in Avatar). This movie starts out well enough but I have to say the ending, starting from when we learn the Dragons true motives, is where the whole movie falls apart. So while the overall story that is driving all these events is weak, its the relationship of this boy and his dragon that is the meat and its very well done. Unfortunately the love interest feels like an afterthought, the character designs (especially the dragons; excluding the Stitch Dragon) are horrendous and goofy looking (as they were left overs from the previous version of this story that was to play out as a comedy akin to SpongeBob) and some of the celebrity voice actors were underwhelming. Also, John Powell's score goes from annoyingly stereotypical of his, sounding like ALL of his other Dreamworks/Blue Sky scores, to just downright mesmerizing (flight with the girl comes to mind). Would've loved to see the ending changed (with some dragon motives that weren't so anti-climatic) and ALL the character designs done by Chris Sanders. Good movie as far as Dreamworks goes, almost as good as KFP or Shrek, but not nearly as good as Lilo and Stitch.

SPOILER I thought it was a nice touch having the main character become a cripple at the end, to match his dragon, even if it felt a little cliched.
Image
Lazario

Post by Lazario »

Image

Image

Rewatched last night because I was feeling in a rare movie mood. Decided to watch some scenes from some various movies. Just scenes, starting with Suspiria and Don't Look Now, and then I popped in this disc and ended up watching the whole thing. Because I've received some odd looks from equally hardcore fans of horror when they know how highly I rate this movie. A refamiliarization on why is never a bad idea. For such a good horror movie, it has its' basis in pretty low budget territory with skilled TV-quality actors (which - TV - as a genre has a certain flatness to it) and many goofy moments to justify the idea of it being an upfront-admitting Jaws ripoff (though not in the eyes of Roger Corman, who financed some of it). To say the least, John Sayles' screenwriting alone is enough to raise the bar on this film above the sequels to Jaws. And to make it generally underrated. The tension this builds is surprising but considerable, The Sound of Music's Heather Menzies (the blonde daughter with curly hair - Brigitta?) gives a great quirky performance, and the special effects are well used. A semi-climactic and very protracted attack scene on a children's summer camp would be a great deal more effective were it to have featured more blood in the aftermath sequence but the anarchic and hellish massacre scene at the resort theme park fixes that - and how! Proving also what easily rises this material in terms of graphic content to the R-rating Jaws shied away from. Another plus to this film over Jaws, Pino Donaggio's incredibly lush, tranquil, creepy, and insanely beautiful score. Way above the call of duty for a low budget horror film, especially one in the same field as the Frogs type trend of schlocky creature-attack / epidemic sci-fi horror hybrids. Classic-horror vet Barbara Steele (The Pit and the Pendulum, Black Sunday) also shows up and gives one of her most interesting villain performances to date. Trivia note: the movie was originally going to end with her face in a Psycho-influenced dissolve to a skull closeup.
User avatar
Disney-Fan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:59 am
Location: Where it's flat and immense and the heat is intense
Contact:

Post by Disney-Fan »

Solomon Kane - 2 hours I just wasted and will never get back unfortunately. Cheesy, hokey, ridiculous. Pick your adjective. In plain english, it flat out sucks.
"See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve." - The Joker
User avatar
SmartAleck25
Special Edition
Posts: 671
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: The U.S.

Post by SmartAleck25 »

Kyle wrote:I think your looking at it all wrong. AL isn't meant to be the main villain like Sid or Hopper, he's just a way of presenting the bigger question for woody, should he stay or go. Your right about the prospector being more threatening, but him being the bad guy only worked because it was a twist no one saw coming. and you acutally sympathize with him and his story. Hopper is pretty 2 dimensional when you think about it. His evilness is based on laziness more than anything.
True, I guess, but I always look at him like a villain. Well, Hopper's motive isn't laziness, IMO, it's more like the feeling of dominance.
Image
User avatar
blackcauldron85
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16689
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:54 am
Gender: Female
Contact:

Post by blackcauldron85 »

I watched The Emperor's New Groove and Cinderella today. *edit* And I just watched The Princess Diaries.
Image
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

Slumdog Millionaire-How does the film hold up against Second-Viewing Syndrome? Pretty well. It's tense, but not as much as the first time. But the ending still touched me. Dev Patel looks to be a star in the making, and I can't wait to see what he's done with Zuko in the Last Airbender. The songs are all very good and addictive. 9/10 :D

I'm amazoning it when it's cheap and affordable.

Edit: I hope a director's cut comes along, cuz one of the moments I remember the most is actually the alternate version of the scene of the kids running through the street in the beginning. It uses the song later used when they're on the trains and has a scene of a kid peeing that really captures the slum life, and for the longest time, I thought that was in the movie.
Image
User avatar
blackcauldron85
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16689
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:54 am
Gender: Female
Contact:

Post by blackcauldron85 »

I watched A Goofy Movie yesterday to end my Disney mini-marathon.
Image
Aqua
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:49 pm

Post by Aqua »

Toy Story 2.

Just realized how much I enjoyed better than the first one!
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

The girl next door (2004)

Sometimes I'm just in the mood for a very light, meaningless, forgettable little comedy. Like this one. And it happened to be on tv anyway, so why not? It's about a smart, clean-cut kid who's about to graduate and go to college, when he meets the new girl next door. She's absolutely smoking hot (I mean the to-die-for type) and sweet and she wants to date this geeky guy. (An ideal chance for me to live out my teenage fantasy through watching a movie.) Oh, and she's also a former porn star.

Film turned out to be not as hot or daring as it sounds. Not very funny either. Tried to turn into a drama halfway through. Didn't work either. So it failed in pretty much everything. But the acting was great, and I thought everybody was perfectly cast, and there was good chemistry between the two leads, which really carried the film. Oh, and there were a lot of gorgeous girls in it. All in all not that bad, after all...
User avatar
Scarred4life
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1410
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 12:18 pm

Post by Scarred4life »

Passion Of The Christ- Watched this in religion class today, and it's the most gory movie I've ever seen. I didn't like it much. Interesting, yes. Horrific, yes. I did find it a bit boring (true, my pet peeve is reading subtitles. But you do get used to it after half an hour or so).
Last edited by Scarred4life on Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

LIONS FOR LAMBS (2007)

Everybody should watch this film.

I repeat: Everybody. Should. Watch. This. Film.

Seriously.

It's a great film if you're a political buff, like I am, but it's also great if you aren't, but if you're just into extraordinary writing, sharp dialogue, terrific acting, intruing plots and interesting characters. The fact that this film will open eyes and blow many a mind is only an added bonus.

You will be overwhelmed, I promise you.

Oh, the film consists of three mainstorylines. One is an experienced journalist (Meryl Streep) having an in-depth interview (really back-and-forth debate) with a senator who's fame is quickly rising (Tom Cruise) about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. She's also struggling to keep her integrity in the big business that is broadcast news nowadays. The second is a young student and a veteran teacher (Robert Redford) engaging in a battle of arguments about the student's future. The third one is about two of the teacher's former students, who are now serving in Afghanistan. You see how they get in life-threatening situations as well as how two highly educated young men like them came to join the army.

Are you still reading this? Why aren't you out, buying the dvd already? Go watch it now!

What's great about the film, is that it's not a 'liberal' movie, or a 'conservative' movie. It presents all kinds of related political issues from all perspectives and through incredible writing and acting, it manages to engage you and to switch sides constantly. These 90 minutes of film will teach you more and give you more insights than a year's worth of tv news.

Everybody. Should. BE MADE TO. Watch. This. Film.
Scarred4life wrote:(true, my pet peeve is reading subtitles.
Ugh... :roll:

Lazy Americans are too indolent to watch anything that's not in their native language. Imagine if all Europeans had that bizarre kind of attitude: Hollywood would lose quite a big part of their income.

A lot of excellent films are made outside of Hollywood, heck, outside of America, in France, Germany, Italy, South-Korea, Taiwan, Brazil, Argentine etc. But you will miss out on all of them because of something as trivial as subtitles. That's sad, man.
Last edited by Goliath on Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Scarred4life
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1410
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 12:18 pm

Post by Scarred4life »

^ I'm not opposed to watching anything in a different language, I actually think it added to the film. It made it more true to what might have happened back then. And as I said before, you didn't really notice the subtitles after the movie started.

(And I'm not American ;) :p)
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

Scarred4life wrote:^ I'm not opposed to watching anything in a different language, I actually think it added to the film. It made it more true to what might have happened back then. And as I said before, you didn't really notice the subtitles after the movie started.

(And I'm not American ;) :p)
I'm glad you took it like a sport, and not got all defensive and all. I really appreciate that. :)

I got into a rant, and it wasn't directed to you specifically. (Hence why I said "Americans", not even bothering to check where you come from.) But I have heard that from a lot of people, and as a movie buff (let alone film scholar), it always rubs me the wrong way whenever people say they don't want to watch films with subtitles.

By the way, I have Dutch relatives who don't want to watch any South-Korean or Taiwanese film because of the language. And I ask them why, because in The Netherlands, *all* foreign films are subtitled, so it doesn't make any difference whether you watch an American or Korean film: you will always read subtitles. "Yeah", they say, "but Korean sounds funny".

I'm sorry, but I can get LIVID about that kind of ignorance. You want to miss out on an excellent film because the language "sounds funny"?! Obviously, those people have never listened to their own backward dialect.

...

Okay, I'm done now. :)
User avatar
Scarred4life
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1410
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 12:18 pm

Post by Scarred4life »

Goliath wrote:I'm glad you took it like a sport, and not got all defensive and all. I really appreciate that. :)
Hehe, no problem. I'm not one to get worked up over a difference of opinion. :)
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

Scarred4life wrote:Hehe, no problem. I'm not one to get worked up over a difference of opinion. :)
That's a rare thing on the internet. :P
User avatar
UmbrellaFish
Signature Collection
Posts: 5717
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:09 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him)

Post by UmbrellaFish »

Just catching a bit of Adam's Rib on TCM, watching Jean Hagen's character's testimony. I forgot how much I love that lady. I haven't seen enough of her work. And of course, there's the great Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy (who I swear to God they based Carl from Up on).
User avatar
SmartAleck25
Special Edition
Posts: 671
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: The U.S.

Post by SmartAleck25 »

Aladdin (1992)- 10/10
Aladdin is one of the greatest DAC's ever. It's sharp, witty, epic, and absolutely magical. The computer graphics are used very well, and it's hard to believe this was only one year after BatB. Great voice acting by Robin Williams and Linda Larkin (though I prefer Salonga). The music is beautiful. But pretty much everyone knows this, so I won't go on. It's too bad that the DTVs' animation was so shoddy, compared to the original. Though I bet this can be said for 95% of DTVs. :P
Image
User avatar
jpanimation
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1841
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:00 am

Post by jpanimation »

Goliath wrote: Ugh... :roll:

Lazy Americans are too indolent to watch anything that's not in their native language. Imagine if all Europeans had that bizarre kind of attitude: Hollywood would lose quite a big part of their income.

A lot of excellent films are made outside of Hollywood, heck, outside of America, in France, Germany, Italy, South-Korea, Taiwan, Brazil, Argentine etc. But you will miss out on all of them because of something as trivial as subtitles. That's sad, man.
Well, I really don't like subtitles and it's not because I'm lazy. I just hate concentrating on reading, figuring out what it means if its a bad sub, and missing what's going on in the scene. Motion pictures are first and foremost a visual medium and if I spend the whole time reading and not appreciating/missing the art being presented to me on screen, then what's the point? Subtitles just distract me from what's really important. This is why I love silent films, they are just soo much more universal, and translate well into any language.

Now with that said, I watch foreign films all the time with subtitles. I always opt for dub on animated films (unless they really screw it up) but never on live-action. It would be terrible to miss out on classics by Akira Kurosawa or Fritz Lang over the head of subtitles. Even modern classics like Pan's Labyrinth.
UmbrellaFish wrote:Just catching a bit of Adam's Rib on TCM, watching Jean Hagen's character's testimony. I forgot how much I love that lady. I haven't seen enough of her work. And of course, there's the great Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy (who I swear to God they based Carl from Up on).
Wait, what? Jean Hagen? You mean Judy Holliday, right? I assume you're a big Singin' in the Rain fan, in which Jean Hagen impersonated Judy Holliday for the role of Lina Lamont. That role was originally written for Judy Holliday, but she was busy doing Born Yesterday, so they had Jean Hagen (her understudy) impersonate her.

Also, I think I remember reading an article in which the creators of Up stated the Guess Who's Coming to Dinner-Spencer Tracy as one of the inspirations for Carl's design.
Image
Locked