Song of the South: Too Offensive to Release on DVD?
- Margos
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA
OK, I finally caved and bought a bootleg. The site I bought it from claimed that it was taken from the highest quality transfer available.... And it does indeed look better than I thought. It's probably the best we're going to get until Disney restores it. I'd recommend the disc, and I don't feel the slightest remorse. If Disney wants my money, they'd better release this movie for real. If not, I'll just have to give it to someone else. (I'm not sure if we're allowed to talk about bootlegging or not around here, so if asked to, I'll remove this link, but if you want SotS in pretty good shape, and "The Martins and the Coys" and "Hot Choclate Soldiers" as bonus shorts.... You want to check out http://www.mayancastledvd.net )
Anyway... I showed it to my six-year-old brother, and he just ate it up like candy. He loves Uncle Remus and Br'er Rabbit sooo much now! I was so glad I got to show it to him, and sincerely hope that Disney smartens up and legitimately releases this film on DVD sometime soon. Sooner or later they're gonna be comin' around.... I'll betcha.... I'll betcha....
Anyway... I showed it to my six-year-old brother, and he just ate it up like candy. He loves Uncle Remus and Br'er Rabbit sooo much now! I was so glad I got to show it to him, and sincerely hope that Disney smartens up and legitimately releases this film on DVD sometime soon. Sooner or later they're gonna be comin' around.... I'll betcha.... I'll betcha....
http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
- kbehm29
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:49 am
- Location: Too Far Away from Disney
- Contact:
I'm almost getting ready to give up and buy a bootleg as well....
So glad your brother enjoyed it. I hope my kids do too some day.
So glad your brother enjoyed it. I hope my kids do too some day.
Disneyland Trips: 1983, 1992, 1995, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2016, Aug 2018
Walt Disney World Trips: 1999, 2007, 2011, 2014, 2016, ~Dec 2018~, ~Apr 2019~
Favorite Disney Movies: Peter Pan, 101 Dalmatians, Tangled, The Princess and the Frog, Enchanted, FROZEN
Walt Disney World Trips: 1999, 2007, 2011, 2014, 2016, ~Dec 2018~, ~Apr 2019~
Favorite Disney Movies: Peter Pan, 101 Dalmatians, Tangled, The Princess and the Frog, Enchanted, FROZEN
- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
Well, I caved and ordered. How would you rate the transfer?Margos wrote:OK, I finally caved and bought a bootleg. The site I bought it from claimed that it was taken from the highest quality transfer available.... And it does indeed look better than I thought. It's probably the best we're going to get until Disney restores it. I'd recommend the disc, and I don't feel the slightest remorse. If Disney wants my money, they'd better release this movie for real. If not, I'll just have to give it to someone else. (I'm not sure if we're allowed to talk about bootlegging or not around here, so if asked to, I'll remove this link, but if you want SotS in pretty good shape, and "The Martins and the Coys" and "Hot Choclate Soldiers" as bonus shorts.... You want to check out http://www.mayancastledvd.net )
Anyway... I showed it to my six-year-old brother, and he just ate it up like candy. He loves Uncle Remus and Br'er Rabbit sooo much now! I was so glad I got to show it to him, and sincerely hope that Disney smartens up and legitimately releases this film on DVD sometime soon. Sooner or later they're gonna be comin' around.... I'll betcha.... I'll betcha....

- Margos
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA
It doesn't look as bad as possible. It's a bit blurry, and there is some grain, artifacts, I think. It's not great, but it's better than some examples I've seen online of other bootlegs. (Note: I got the 2.0 disc, I don't know what you got. I have no idea if they're being honest or if they're just trying to make more money, but they say that the 2.0 uses a better source material, and so the transfer is better.)
Really, the sound is more annoying. It just sounds.... blurry. It's hard to describe how something can sound "blurry," it just does. But if you listen carefully, you can understand everything. It's not horrible, but it sure isn't perfect.
All in all, probably as good as it's going to get until Disney does the right thing.
Really, the sound is more annoying. It just sounds.... blurry. It's hard to describe how something can sound "blurry," it just does. But if you listen carefully, you can understand everything. It's not horrible, but it sure isn't perfect.
All in all, probably as good as it's going to get until Disney does the right thing.
http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
- jpanimation
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:00 am
- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
Actually I just ordered a couple hours ago using the link you provided, so I dont have my copy yet.Margos wrote:It doesn't look as bad as possible. It's a bit blurry, and there is some grain, artifacts, I think. It's not great, but it's better than some examples I've seen online of other bootlegs. (Note: I got the 2.0 disc, I don't know what you got. I have no idea if they're being honest or if they're just trying to make more money, but they say that the 2.0 uses a better source material, and so the transfer is better.)
Really, the sound is more annoying. It just sounds.... blurry. It's hard to describe how something can sound "blurry," it just does. But if you listen carefully, you can understand everything. It's not horrible, but it sure isn't perfect.
All in all, probably as good as it's going to get until Disney does the right thing.

- Margos
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA
Well, did you buy the cheap one or the more expensive one? The more expensive one is the 2.0. Plus, with the 2.0, you get to pick which easter egg bonus shorts you get, and you get 2 of them, instead of just automatically getting "Coal Black and De Sebben Dwarfs."
http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
- Escapay
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 12562
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Time and Space
- Contact:
Buying bootleg DVDs is bad! Don't waste your money on them!
Just torrent the movie for free, as it's generally the same quality anyway! Extras be damned, they're already on youtube as well.
albert
Just torrent the movie for free, as it's generally the same quality anyway! Extras be damned, they're already on youtube as well.
albert
WIST #60:
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion?
WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion?
WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
uhhhh........have to check.Margos wrote:Well, did you buy the cheap one or the more expensive one? The more expensive one is the 2.0. Plus, with the 2.0, you get to pick which easter egg bonus shorts you get, and you get 2 of them, instead of just automatically getting "Coal Black and De Sebben Dwarfs."
EDIT: Sent an email requesting an upgrade to the 2.0 disc, but Im not sure if that will come with a free disc or not, like the site says.
Oh, and Albert-yes it's bad........for DVDs that have been released officially.

- Margos
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: A small suburban/rural town in PA
You have to order the free disc specifically if you want it, so if you don't know, then no, you didn't get one. I didn't get one, but that was my choice, actually.
http://dragonsbane.webs.com
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
http://childrenofnight.webs.com
^My websites promoting my two WIP novels! Check them out for exclusive content!
-
dvdjunkie
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5613
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:05 am
- Location: Wichita, Kansas
As most of you know, I have two versions of "Song of the South" on DVD that were purchased from different sites (that were allowed to advertise on the UD site). Both of those sites have since departed, or have been busted or something that now prevents them from being available to purchase from.
The first DVD I bought was in 2000 and was a single-disc. It came complete with a beautiful cover, and the artwork on the disc was exceptional, compared to some of the Disney stuff as of late. The quality of the picture was good. It opens with the classic Mickey Mouse wand opening for a Disney feature film. The opening credits are centered on the screen with a gold border, and the sound is as good as anything I have heard from most bootleg products. The film opens pillar-boxed while the narrator is speaking and when the horse and buggy scenes begins the film fills the screen.
The only extras on this disc are the original trailers for the film and the re-release trailer. The hidden easter egg is "Coal Black and the Sebben Dwarfs", plus there is a music juke box with all the songs from the movie done by Johnny Mercer.
The second purchase I made was in 2004, and this was probably the best copy I have ever seen. It cost a bit more than any other 'bootleg' product I have ever purchased, but it claims to be a 'faithful, digital restoration of the classic Disney hit', and I believe them after watching the film. It is a two-disc set, with the fully restored original trailer opening every thing up on Disc One. Then the Menu screen comes on and offers the "original Mono" soundtrack or the "digitally mastered stereo" track.
The movie itself is fantastic and when played on my Blu-ray player it takes on a whole different life than when played on a conventional DVD player. The picture is crisp, the colors are brilliant, and there are no artifacts to distract the viewing of this classic film.
The second disc of this two-disc set offers the complete, unedited version of "Coal Black" along with some other Classic cartoons featuring Bug Bunny ("Bugs Nips the Nips") and "The Ant and the Aardvark". On the menu there are listed other cartoons in a themed setting. Click on "Disney edits" and you get "The Martins and the Coys" complete, unedited, and you get the original "Pecos Bill" from "Melody Time", totally uncensored and unedited, along with the sequence from "Fantasia" that has been so brutally censored from all the US Disney releases. And for the real collector there is a Menu button that gives you all the songs from "Song of the South" with the little bouncing ball to sing-a-long with.
These two versions of the movie will remain in my collection even if Disney releases a legiticate version, because I value their quality and "extras" that I am sure Disney will not release, if they ever do release SotS to the American buying public.
I also have the Japanese Laser-Disc version of "Song of the South", and both of these bootlegs are superior to that version - no Japanese subtitles on the left-side of the screen throughout the movie.

The first DVD I bought was in 2000 and was a single-disc. It came complete with a beautiful cover, and the artwork on the disc was exceptional, compared to some of the Disney stuff as of late. The quality of the picture was good. It opens with the classic Mickey Mouse wand opening for a Disney feature film. The opening credits are centered on the screen with a gold border, and the sound is as good as anything I have heard from most bootleg products. The film opens pillar-boxed while the narrator is speaking and when the horse and buggy scenes begins the film fills the screen.
The only extras on this disc are the original trailers for the film and the re-release trailer. The hidden easter egg is "Coal Black and the Sebben Dwarfs", plus there is a music juke box with all the songs from the movie done by Johnny Mercer.
The second purchase I made was in 2004, and this was probably the best copy I have ever seen. It cost a bit more than any other 'bootleg' product I have ever purchased, but it claims to be a 'faithful, digital restoration of the classic Disney hit', and I believe them after watching the film. It is a two-disc set, with the fully restored original trailer opening every thing up on Disc One. Then the Menu screen comes on and offers the "original Mono" soundtrack or the "digitally mastered stereo" track.
The movie itself is fantastic and when played on my Blu-ray player it takes on a whole different life than when played on a conventional DVD player. The picture is crisp, the colors are brilliant, and there are no artifacts to distract the viewing of this classic film.
The second disc of this two-disc set offers the complete, unedited version of "Coal Black" along with some other Classic cartoons featuring Bug Bunny ("Bugs Nips the Nips") and "The Ant and the Aardvark". On the menu there are listed other cartoons in a themed setting. Click on "Disney edits" and you get "The Martins and the Coys" complete, unedited, and you get the original "Pecos Bill" from "Melody Time", totally uncensored and unedited, along with the sequence from "Fantasia" that has been so brutally censored from all the US Disney releases. And for the real collector there is a Menu button that gives you all the songs from "Song of the South" with the little bouncing ball to sing-a-long with.
These two versions of the movie will remain in my collection even if Disney releases a legiticate version, because I value their quality and "extras" that I am sure Disney will not release, if they ever do release SotS to the American buying public.
I also have the Japanese Laser-Disc version of "Song of the South", and both of these bootlegs are superior to that version - no Japanese subtitles on the left-side of the screen throughout the movie.
The only way to watch movies - Original Aspect Ratio!!!!
I LOVE my Blu-Ray Disc Player!
I LOVE my Blu-Ray Disc Player!
- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
-
merlinjones
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:52 am
Someone has posted "A Tribute to Joel Chandler Harris" on YouTube.
This is the 1956 episode of "Disneyland" that promoted the first re-issue of "Song of the South" - - hosted by Walt and starring David Stollery (of "Spin and Marty"), the story is about young Joel and how he was inspired to become a writer and his inspirations for the "Uncle Remus" stories.
This should be one of the legitimate extras on a proper Disney DVD set (when and if that day comes to pass).
5 parts starting with:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rCIb6e5pok
This is the 1956 episode of "Disneyland" that promoted the first re-issue of "Song of the South" - - hosted by Walt and starring David Stollery (of "Spin and Marty"), the story is about young Joel and how he was inspired to become a writer and his inspirations for the "Uncle Remus" stories.
This should be one of the legitimate extras on a proper Disney DVD set (when and if that day comes to pass).
5 parts starting with:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rCIb6e5pok
- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
- Elladorine
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4372
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
- Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
- Contact:
Just stepping in to mention that Roger Ebert just tweeted a comment about the film: There is nothing in "Song of the South" remotely as offensive as the images that bombard kids from TV every day.
http://twitter.com/ebertchicago/status/17689839110
What's interesting to me about the comment is that (if I recall correctly) he's not in favor of Disney giving it a wide release.
http://twitter.com/ebertchicago/status/17689839110
What's interesting to me about the comment is that (if I recall correctly) he's not in favor of Disney giving it a wide release.
Yeah, Ebert was in favor of Disney not releasing this movie simply because Disney is so integrated into society that the movie would create a false idea of American history (or something like that).enigmawing wrote:Just stepping in to mention that Roger Ebert just tweeted a comment about the film: There is nothing in "Song of the South" remotely as offensive as the images that bombard kids from TV every day.
http://twitter.com/ebertchicago/status/17689839110
What's interesting to me about the comment is that (if I recall correctly) he's not in favor of Disney giving it a wide release.
Weird he would be saying that, though, but I agree. There are far worse images of African American people on TV right now. I mean, in The Boondocks the "N" word is shouted like it turns coal into money every time you say it. And it might be on an adult network, but I am sure some kids will sneak some episodes in.
- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
- jpanimation
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:00 am
I also agree with Ebert on this one (I don't agree with him on much anymore). As far as The Boondocks, I think one of the main things the show has been doing is addressing the self-destructive nature of an African American culture that would idealize gangsters and thuggish rappers and would call each other a derogatory term (the "N" word) as a sign of respect and would portray women (bitches) in such a demeaning way (as represented by Riley). The show's first season was amazing political and social satire with some heart felt episodes, the second season started out strong but lost it's way, and the third season has been a waste of time (OK, the Stinkmeaner episode had some amazing fight scenes). In all seriousness, it's absolutely ridiculous for the NAACP and other organizations like them to announce a vendetta against Uncle Remus but not Uncle Ruckus (seriously, there is a BIG difference in offensiveness).pap64 wrote:Weird he would be saying that, though, but I agree. There are far worse images of African American people on TV right now. I mean, in The Boondocks the "N" word is shouted like it turns coal into money every time you say it. And it might be on an adult network, but I am sure some kids will sneak some episodes in.

The funny thing is, if you think about it, if there was no boycott and Disney wasn't afraid of releasing Song of the South, I would not be surprised if it was one of those titles they didn't really promote much or have much familiarity with the public (like Rascal or Bedknobs & Broomsticks, rather than a Mary Poppins).
At least, that's what I think. This "forbidden fruit" air about the film has only made it more well-known.
At least, that's what I think. This "forbidden fruit" air about the film has only made it more well-known.
-
merlinjones
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:52 am
>>This "forbidden fruit" air about the film has only made it more well-known.<<
The film was reissued three times during the 1970s and 80's (post Civil Rights era) and it was simply considered another of the perennial Walt Disney classics - - there was very little controversy of note. The animation was always highly praised and the film was always extremely popular on reissue (the 1972 reissue was Disney's highest grossing re-release ever at the time).
This whole "forbidden fruit" (as you say) aspect was created by the Eisner and post-Eisner management at Disney who internally banned the movie for lack of political correctness -- that absence from public view has taken on a life of its own and created monsters in the shadows where there are none. It's dated to be sure, but not racist in intent or theme.
The film was reissued three times during the 1970s and 80's (post Civil Rights era) and it was simply considered another of the perennial Walt Disney classics - - there was very little controversy of note. The animation was always highly praised and the film was always extremely popular on reissue (the 1972 reissue was Disney's highest grossing re-release ever at the time).
This whole "forbidden fruit" (as you say) aspect was created by the Eisner and post-Eisner management at Disney who internally banned the movie for lack of political correctness -- that absence from public view has taken on a life of its own and created monsters in the shadows where there are none. It's dated to be sure, but not racist in intent or theme.





