God this movie is going to ROCK!
So excited.

Are you sure they aren't reproductions? I don't think that Disney would go out and willingly give you original cels from Cindy and SB. Just a thought.kurtadisneyite wrote:Yes, I have 2 original CINDERELLA cels, and two from SLEEPING BEAUTY.
Back in the good ole days at Disneyland, there used to be an art shop that would sell old pencil sketches and animated cels from the movies for a quarter. Obviously since then they've risen in price!TheSequelofDisney wrote:Are you sure they aren't reproductions? I don't think that Disney would go out and willingly give you original cels from Cindy and SB. Just a thought.kurtadisneyite wrote:Yes, I have 2 original CINDERELLA cels, and two from SLEEPING BEAUTY.
That's true, but this is not the same kind of variation that you find in <i>Cinderella III</i>. The changes I'm referring to are much more drastic. In some frames, she appears wildy off-model, as if another character entirely, or some cheap knock-off Cinderella that you would find in a Toys 'R' Us bargain bin. Of course, those are less frequent and less noticeable than the more common, roughly-on-model drawings. Still, the problem in C3 isn't merely a case of different approaches or an effort to match her various looks in the original.kurtadisneyite wrote:One comment about C-III review; Cindy III's heroine apperance was described as somewhat variable. That's right in line with the original movie, which (per the Plat disk's documentaries) had two distinct Cindy heroine styles;
1. Eric Larson "homespun" approach (beginning of movie through kitchen, some of the ball stuff). Note Cindy has large eyes and small waist here.
2. Marc Davis "sophisicated" approach (scenes with the Godmother (Milt Kahl, animator), 1st bedroom confrontation with stepmother). Smaller eyes, more normal waistline.
This is typical for any hand drawn feature. Even Sleeping Beauty, one of the most fussed over features Disney ever made, has character variations throughout its length.


I've only just started collecting animation art - and this is a hell of a time for me to start! So far I've got a production cell of Marvin Martian from the original 'Duck Dodgers and the 24th and 1/2 Century' (signed by Chuck Jones) and a production drawing of Prince Charming from the original 'Cinderella'. I'd really like to get something from the beautiful 'Sleeping Beauty', but they are understandably rather expensive.kurtadisneyite wrote:Yes, I have 2 original CINDERELLA cels, and two from SLEEPING BEAUTY.
SPOILERS...atlanticaunderthesea wrote:POSSIBLE SPOILERS AHEAD
Ok, a thought just struck me. When does everyone know that they have gone back in time? As far as Cinderella is concerned, she danced with the Prince, fell in love, the Duke came with the slipper, but it fit Anastasia, not her. She does not understand this, but knows the Prince will recognise her. The mice see the Stepmother with the wand, and cast a spell on the Prince, making him forget her. She presumably gets the wand, and releasses him from the spell, THEN they get married, just like the original movie. I really can't see how Tremaine convinces her to go in the pumpkin. Then, at the end of the movie, is Time put right? they get all the memories from the past year back? Or what?
Sorry for the long essay / plot thing, but this has been really bugging me!
