I find it an improvement over Up. Married life was portrayed too ideal in that film. They've been together for so many years and they never had an argument or a disagreement? Come on. It would had been much better if they had shown them having a spat at some point and how they managed to get through it and move on afterwards. That would had given an interesting insight on how relationships actually work.PatrickvD wrote:I like 'Head over Heels' as well. Even though, thematically, it's heavily borrowing ideas from Up. It's pretty much impossible not to think of Up while watching it.
Oscar for Best Animated Feature 2012
-
Sotiris
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Fantasyland
-
PatrickvD
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5207
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
- Location: The Netherlands
I'm pretty sure there are couples that rarely fight. Also, I think their life was far from ideal. I've never thought of Up portraying married life as ideal. The way they kept procrastinating their dreams was pretty damn depressing. Especially when she died.Sotiris wrote:I find it an improvement over Up. Married life was portrayed too ideal in that film. They've been together for so many years and they never had an argument or a disagreement? Come on. It would had been much better if they had shown them having a spat at some point and how they managed to get through it and move on afterwards. That would had given an interesting insight on how relationships actually work.
They're announcing the BAFTA winners at the moment and Best Animated Feature went to:
Brave. Keep in mind Wreck-It Ralph didn't open in the UK until after the eligibility period. Still, I'm surprised Frankenweenie didn't win. But Brave is set in Scotland, so maybe it got bonus points for that. I'm still predicting Wreck-It Ralph to win the Oscar, but Brave's chances went up today.
Brave. Keep in mind Wreck-It Ralph didn't open in the UK until after the eligibility period. Still, I'm surprised Frankenweenie didn't win. But Brave is set in Scotland, so maybe it got bonus points for that. I'm still predicting Wreck-It Ralph to win the Oscar, but Brave's chances went up today.
"There are two wolves and they are always fighting. One is darkness and despair. The other is light and hope. Which wolf wins? Whichever one you feed." - Casey Newton, Tomorrowland
-
disneyboy20022
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:17 pm
I agree with that gif. It's pretty much what i think too. Brave is an okay films but there are others such as Wreck It Ralph that are much better films and Brave hardly deserves these awards. Especially with Brenda Chapman not getting invited to the Golden Globes which makes me ticked offSotiris wrote:estefan wrote:They're announcing the BAFTA winners and Best Animated Feature went to Brave.
Want to Hear How I met Roy E. Disney in 2003? Click the link Below
http://fromscreentotheme.com/ThursdayTr ... isney.aspx
http://fromscreentotheme.com/ThursdayTr ... isney.aspx
-
PatrickvD
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5207
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Glen Close sums up my reaction to this news quite well:Sotiris wrote:estefan wrote:They're announcing the BAFTA winners and Best Animated Feature went to Brave.
It's a good thing the BAFTA's are not a precursor to the Oscars. Emanuele Riva winning best actress was the biggest surprise to me. I figured since she already won a BAFTA for Hiroshima Mon Amour, I'd figure they'd skip her this time. It was kind of awkward because Chastain and JLaw were kind of ready to get up and Riva wasn't there.
Good show though.
Thaaaat is certainly very subjective. I think most here will tell you that Frankenweenie was a better film and Paranorman was a more impressive filmmaking accomplishment. While I personally like Brave best of the three, I would bet against it winning anything.qindarka wrote:estefan wrote:They're announcing the BAFTA winners and Best Animated Feature went to Brave.
Brave was far superior to either Paranorman or Frankenweenie. Well deserved.
Don't think WIR was eligible, it not being released in Britain until 2013.
Just going by my own opinion here. All of us around here pretty much do.SWillie! wrote:
Thaaaat is certainly very subjective. I think most here will tell you that Frankenweenie was a better film and Paranorman was a more impressive filmmaking accomplishment. While I personally like Brave best of the three, I would bet against it winning anything.
Brave has the Pixar name behind it and the backlash has made it easy to forget that it did get good reviews. Won't be surprised at it winning any award including the Oscars after that GG win.
Using critical reception to back you up when it's convenient, eh? I am sure that a lot of your opinions differ significantly from the critics. You can't have it both ways.Sotiris wrote:Pfft. No, it wasn't. And the critics agree with that. ParaNorman and Frankenweenie have a higher score than Brave both on Rotten Tomatoes and on Metacritic.qindarka wrote:Brave was far superior to either Paranorman or Frankenweenie. Well deserved.
-
PatrickvD
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5207
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
- Location: The Netherlands
BAFTA's and Golden Globes are NOT a precursor to the Oscars. Look no further than the film critics awards, the Annie's and the Producers Guild. Who've all overwhelmingly voted in favor of two films:
Paranorman and Wreck-It Ralph. With Frankenweenie as the underdog.
Brave and Pirates: Band of Misfits are NOT winning. I will eat my shoes if one of them does.
Paranorman and Wreck-It Ralph. With Frankenweenie as the underdog.
Brave and Pirates: Band of Misfits are NOT winning. I will eat my shoes if one of them does.
-
Sotiris
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Fantasyland
I don't have it both ways. Even if I happen to like a film that was not critically acclaimed, I can certainly recognize its flaws and understand that my taste is subjective since I have no professional knowledge on the subject. I don't go on about pretending that I know better and insisting that the critics were wrong.qindarka wrote:Using critical reception to back you up when it's convenient, eh? I am sure that a lot of your opinions differ significantly from the critics. You can't have it both ways.
Last edited by Sotiris on Sun Feb 10, 2013 5:44 pm, edited 3 times in total.
You are putting too much stock in what the critics say. The majority of them are not noted for any particular insight or analytic ability. A good portion of the reviewers on RT aren't even genuine critics at all. Even the Top Critics aren't that professional, the Guardian for instance writes reviews about 200 words long with absolutely no insight.Sotiris wrote:
I don't have it both ways. Even if I happen to like a film that was not critically acclaimed, I can certainly recognize its flaws and understand that my taste is subjective since I have no professional knowledge on the subject. I don't go on about that I know better and that the critics were wrong.
No need to be afraid of our own opinions, it's just movies. We don't have to submit to their authority on something so subjective.
Don't think I am anti-critic though. I still favor their opinions over general internet reaction which tends to be fanboyish and hyperbolic.
Edit: Sorry for the double post.