I don't think it's racially motivated, but it is one of my smaller critiques of LA The Little Mermaid that Halle's Ariel didn't get a proper ball gown, though I can also understand why they didn't have the same narrative opportunities that came effortlessly to princesses like Cinderella and Belle. Their films both had balls and the like, and there isn't really anything like that in Ariel's film except I guess Eric and Vanessa's wedding, and it wouldn't have made internal sense for her to be given a fancy outfit for something she wasn't invited to.Lavendergolden wrote: โThu Jan 16, 2025 6:50 am I find it funny that Disney claims to be so progressive and wake in terms of racial politics but with their two recent black princesses (LA Ariel and Asha) they don't give them more than one dress. And Disney defenders who will burn down everything around them but never admit that Disney's racial recastings are awful decisions won't note this or call it out. That there is something more intrinsically racist about how Cinderella, Belle, Jasmine, etc. can get so many dress changes but LA Ariel has like one blue dress which is plain and super simple and then the pink variant at the end. Disney is basically saying black girls don't get to wear frilly ballgowns and can only wear plain peasant smocks.
I've wondered if part of the reason why Ariel's fins are so frilly is because they were trying to compensate for the absence of a proper ballgown, but they're still filling a short gap for me seeing how Ariel's village dress is one of my favorite outfits from the remakes.









