Frozen: Part V

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
taei
Special Edition
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 7:32 am

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by taei »

Image

golly gee the people who boycotted Frozen sure did make an impact on ticket sales
via emma's disney world on tumblr.
rotfl
"In every age, Family is king,
and the bravest journeys, are never taken alone."
-Brave.
User avatar
Musical Master
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1528
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:53 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by Musical Master »

taei wrote:
Image

golly gee the people who boycotted Frozen sure did make an impact on ticket sales
via emma's disney world on tumblr.
rotfl
This is too rich! :P :P :P :P
Disney, Pixar, Rodgers and Hammerstein, and Cinema fan
User avatar
DisneyEra
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1520
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by DisneyEra »

taei wrote:
Image

golly gee the people who boycotted Frozen sure did make an impact on ticket sales
via emma's disney world on tumblr.
rotfl
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/25 ... zp1uq.jpeg
She still can't believe it :D
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16288
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by Disney's Divinity »

I'm very glad for the success--crazy that it'll probably cross B&tB adjusted soon--but I almost wonder why this particular film is going so high? Usually when a studio is hitting their high, each movie goes up one after another, but Tangled went up, WIR a little under that, and now this is going skyhigh. Odd. Maybe it doesn't have as much competition as those two or something?

What I love about the movie is that it's female-centered and inclusive without being so politically engineered, in-your-face, or artificial like Brave, for instance. Reminds me of TLM in that regard.

I keep updating that list I made, just for myself since nobody goes back pages. :lol:
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ "Elizabeth Taylor"
Katy Perry ~ "bandaid"
Meghan Trainor ~ "Still Don't Care"
User avatar
Musical Master
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1528
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:53 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by Musical Master »

Disney's Divinity wrote:I'm very glad for the success--crazy that it'll probably cross B&tB adjusted soon--but I almost wonder why this particular film is going so high? Usually when a studio is hitting their high, each movie goes up one after another, but Tangled went up, WIR a little under that, and now this is going skyhigh. Odd. Maybe it doesn't have as much competition as those two or something?

What I love about the movie is that it's female-centered and inclusive without being so politically engineered, in-your-face, or artificial like Brave, for instance. Reminds me of TLM in that regard.

I keep updating that list I made, just for myself since nobody goes back pages. :lol:
I remember back in 2010, WAY before I joined the boards, everyone expected Tangled to be as successful as TLK and look what happend.

Frozen to me, feels like a Disney movie that is a great one on it's OWN TERMS that can't be compared to the movies of the "Renaissance" but it's story, song, character, and animation could be comfortable with them, also due to strong word of mouth of why it's great to a great amount of people is another reason why Frozen is more successful than the past 4 Disney films.
Disney, Pixar, Rodgers and Hammerstein, and Cinema fan
User avatar
frankf3
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 11:10 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by frankf3 »

I think Frozen's success can be accounted for three reasons:

1. Momentum/Word of Mouth- After Tangled and Wreck It Ralph, the general audience has gained confidence in Disney again in putting out high quality movies. Also, most people basically said they either liked it or completely thought it was fantastic. This movie is one of those cases where word of mouth truly spread.

2. Lack of Competition- Looking at the movies that came out after Frozen, there was really no family movies out there as an alternative. Walking with Dinosaurs did absolutely nothing. Walter Mitty (PG rated) didn't make much of an impact either. I thought Saving Mr. Banks would bring in the families since it's Mary Poppins related, but even that didn't hurt Frozen. Frozen was released at a really good time.

3. The Sister Aspect- Other than Lilo and Stitch, is there any Disney movie that really deals with a Sister relationship story? In fact, we don't really see many movies that address a sister relationship. That is the main appeal of Frozen in my eyes for many people, especially with the third act resolution.
User avatar
Musical Master
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1528
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:53 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by Musical Master »

frankf3 wrote:I think Frozen's success can be accounted for three reasons:

1. Momentum/Word of Mouth- After Tangled and Wreck It Ralph, the general audience has gained confidence in Disney again in putting out high quality movies. Also, most people basically said they either liked it or completely thought it was fantastic. This movie is one of those cases where word of mouth truly spread.

2. Lack of Competition- Looking at the movies that came out after Frozen, there was really no family movies out there as an alternative. Walking with Dinosaurs did absolutely nothing. Walter Mitty (PG rated) didn't make much of an impact either. I thought Saving Mr. Banks would bring in the families since it's Mary Poppins related, but even that didn't hurt Frozen. Frozen was released at a really good time.

3. The Sister Aspect- Other than Lilo and Stitch, is there any Disney movie that really deals with a Sister relationship story? In fact, we don't really see many movies that address a sister relationship. That is the main appeal of Frozen in my eyes for many people, especially with the third act resolution.
Thank GOD that a revolting, atrocious movie like Walking with Dinosaurs flopped while Frozen is still going sky high.
Disney, Pixar, Rodgers and Hammerstein, and Cinema fan
taei
Special Edition
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 7:32 am

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by taei »

DisneyEra wrote: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/25 ... zp1uq.jpeg
She still can't believe it :D
Image
Image
"In every age, Family is king,
and the bravest journeys, are never taken alone."
-Brave.
User avatar
thelittleursula
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1235
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:15 am
Location: Europe

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by thelittleursula »

frankf3 wrote:
2. Lack of Competition- Looking at the movies that came out after Frozen, there was really no family movies out there as an alternative. Walking with Dinosaurs did absolutely nothing. Walter Mitty (PG rated) didn't make much of an impact either. I thought Saving Mr. Banks would bring in the families since it's Mary Poppins related, but even that didn't hurt Frozen. Frozen was released at a really good time.
I disagree, I mean Hunger Games and Hobbit was pretty big competition; they weren't family movies per say, but you could still take your kids to them. When I went to see Frozen there was a Hobbit screening showing and Hunger Games and alot of parents were taking their kids to see them.

Walking with Dinosaurs could of been a big hit, after all many kids love Dinosaurs. It's still not out in some countries yet, so I wouldn't sneeze on it just yet.
DisneyEra wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/25 ... zp1uq.jpeg
She still can't believe it :D

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANk8xlsp1pQ[/youtube]
User avatar
jazzflower92
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1045
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by jazzflower92 »

thelittleursula wrote:
frankf3 wrote:
2. Lack of Competition- Looking at the movies that came out after Frozen, there was really no family movies out there as an alternative. Walking with Dinosaurs did absolutely nothing. Walter Mitty (PG rated) didn't make much of an impact either. I thought Saving Mr. Banks would bring in the families since it's Mary Poppins related, but even that didn't hurt Frozen. Frozen was released at a really good time.
I disagree, I mean Hunger Games and Hobbit was pretty big competition; they weren't family movies per say, but you could still take your kids to them. When I went to see Frozen there was a Hobbit screening showing and Hunger Games and alot of parents were taking their kids to see them.

Walking with Dinosaurs could of been a big hit, after all many kids love Dinosaurs. It's still not out in some countries yet, so I wouldn't sneeze on it just yet.
DisneyEra wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/25 ... zp1uq.jpeg
She still can't believe it :D

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANk8xlsp1pQ[/youtube]
Yeah, but on the other hand many adults don't want to be tortured by bad movies that seem to be aimed at the lowest common denominator.
User avatar
Musical Master
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1528
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:53 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by Musical Master »

Not to mention that WwD's word of mouth has been very weak, so Frozen is the clear family film winner here.
Disney, Pixar, Rodgers and Hammerstein, and Cinema fan
User avatar
thelittleursula
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1235
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:15 am
Location: Europe

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by thelittleursula »

jazzflower92 wrote: Yeah, but on the other hand many adults don't want to be tortured by bad movies that seem to be aimed at the lowest common denominator.
They seem to enjoy the torture that was The Smurf Movies, Ice Age II-IV, Alvin and the Chipmunks movies, Shrek III-IV

:|
User avatar
Musical Master
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1528
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:53 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by Musical Master »

thelittleursula wrote:
jazzflower92 wrote: Yeah, but on the other hand many adults don't want to be tortured by bad movies that seem to be aimed at the lowest common denominator.
They seem to enjoy the torture that was The Smurf Movies, Ice Age II-IV, Alvin and the Chipmunks movies, Shrek III-IV

:|
That's what's so infuriating about parents today, they want a family movie that will keep their kids quiet when they could take them to a better family film that the adults can enjoy as well.

Some people today can be reeeeeeeaaaaaallllllllllllyyyyyyyyy strange.... :| :| :| :|
Disney, Pixar, Rodgers and Hammerstein, and Cinema fan
User avatar
thedisneyspirit
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1503
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by thedisneyspirit »

I personally find dinosaur films boring...After all you know they will die eventually, and the only thing they do in these films is walking and walking and walking...What a snoozefest
User avatar
rodis
Special Edition
Posts: 879
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 11:12 am

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by rodis »

This is also going to mark the first time in which a Disney animated film beat Pixar at the domestic box office.

Ever since 1995, Pixar always outdid them commercially (Toy Story vs. Pocahontas, A Bug's Life vs. Mulan, Toy Story 2 vs. Tarzan, and of course no need to break down the 2000's).
TsWade2
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1812
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:07 pm

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by TsWade2 »

Walking With Dinosaurs is lame and it makes sense it flopped.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdCUpiI1MSA
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by PatrickvD »

Any parent taking their kids to see Catching Fire needs to have their parenting skills examined.
User avatar
unprincess
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2134
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:00 pm

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by unprincess »

dont get me started on how they totally ruined the WWD movie. Im a huge dinosaur fan & i loved the first WWD documentary tv specials, but they had to ruin this movie with that atrocious dialogue. Mind you I only seen the trailer (during my view of Frozen) but I went WTF?! when I saw that gorgeous dinosaur animation marred by those stupid sounding voices. What a waste.

I felt the same way about Disney's Dinosaur too. I liked it & own the dvd, but it could have been so much better without the stupid lemurs.
taei
Special Edition
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 7:32 am

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by taei »

PatrickvD wrote:Any parent taking their kids to see Catching Fire needs to have their parenting skills examined.
Wolf of Wall street... that's all I have to say. I've heard of parents taking their kids to it.
"In every age, Family is king,
and the bravest journeys, are never taken alone."
-Brave.
User avatar
disneyprincess11
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4363
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:46 am
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: Frozen: Part V

Post by disneyprincess11 »

So, I saw Frozen the second time and to be honest, it was better. I said before that it took 2-3 views to see where Frozen stands with the classics, and I have to say: Yeah, it's really up there in the 90s movies. The story and the music are so close to the 90s. But, I did discovered that the script can be way too modern at times, esepecially for Anna and it can be distracting. :|

But, my parents LOVED it and I don't know if my sisters liked it ("It was fine"). And there wasn't really reactions (The Hans twist had a couple "What?"s and a kid crying :P, but laughter. My mom actually whispered to me at the middle of the movie, "You're right, this is good". :D
Post Reply