o yeah....movies with Hilary Duff RULE!!!!!!!!!!! shes the best actress and singer







Well, I hate to disagree with Mr Net, and I know his feelings on 'Alice' in particular are quite strong, but c'mon - WORST Disney film ever made? There have to be at least a dozen Hilary Duff/Lohan vehicles we've already forgotten about that sucked ass in the last few years.2099net wrote:Alice in Wonderland or Robin Hood
Alice - I just dislike the main character sooooooo much (plus the episodic structure)
Robin Hood because of the lame recycled animal designs (plus I think having them all as animals is a silly idea which harms the storytelling).
And then people say Disney today is uncreative. I've yet to see them using the same character designs in three "Original" movies.
I hear ya there, and I can understand where you're coming from. Besides, everyone's entitled to their own opinion.singerguy04 wrote: My problem with it was this... it was of less quality than what i'm used to from the Disney name. I mean you can blame it on the time it was made, and i'd probably agree but it doesn't seem like the people who made this movie spent enough time with it. It had great potential, I thought, but nobody capitalized on it. That's probably why even a lot of the public has no clue it exists, or at least a lot of the public that I have run across. I almost wish they would re-make this movie, even though that would be blaspheme. lol
yeah that about does it for me and why I am not very crazy about the black cauldronI know it could have been so much better. That plau the horned scared the leaving crap out of me always.....Isidour wrote:Only one??
man, that´s tougth...
I mean, I dislike the black cauldron, home on the range,the cheapquels...
mmm...
The black cauldron
No songs, characters than seems more cheap than the supermarket-brand cola. Very bad designs--looks like the old productions of some unknown studio-- and the plot just no of a Disny movie
On the contrary - as strange as it seems, it took a looong time, about ten years. The problem was rather that they didn't quite know where they were going with it.singerguy04 wrote:I mean you can blame it on the time it was made, and i'd probably agree but it doesn't seem like the people who made this movie spent enough time with it.
Loomis wrote:Besides, we all know Cinderella is the most boring piece of crap Disney has ever churned out.
To both Netty and Loomis for your choices, shame on you! Alice in Wonderland, Cinderella and Robin Hood rock da house!Loomis wrote:Well, I hate to disagree with Mr Net, and I know his feelings on 'Alice' in particular are quite strong, but c'mon - WORST Disney film ever made? There have to be at least a dozen Hilary Duff/Lohan vehicles we've already forgotten about that sucked ass in the last few years.2099net wrote:Alice in Wonderland or Robin Hood
Alice - I just dislike the main character sooooooo much (plus the episodic structure)
Robin Hood because of the lame recycled animal designs (plus I think having them all as animals is a silly idea which harms the storytelling).
And then people say Disney today is uncreative. I've yet to see them using the same character designs in three "Original" movies.
In fact, I'm willing to lump most Disney live action since 1980 into that category.
Besides, we all know Cinderella is the most boring piece of crap Disney has ever churned out.
Well, there is a difference in spending 10 years working on the movie and the movie ending up looking like you spent 10 years on it. Maybe the story and animation style kept changing, and that is really what accounts for the ammount of time. Could it also be that funding wasn't all that great? I understand it's importance in the Disney line, but that doesn't mean i have to like it, lol.Lars Vermundsberget wrote:On the contrary - as strange as it seems, it took a looong time, about ten years. The problem was rather that they didn't quite know where they were going with it.singerguy04 wrote:I mean you can blame it on the time it was made, and i'd probably agree but it doesn't seem like the people who made this movie spent enough time with it.
Can I assume you're referring to The Nightmare Before Christmas?Dan05 wrote:What's so great about itTheLittleMerman wrote:
![]()
![]()
I've seen it..and I thought it was okay. Not "worst", not "great" but okay.Evil Genie Jafar wrote:Sorry to keep with this... but it seems none of you saw Home on the Range, right?