Exactly. Saved me time posting that! thanks!Scamander wrote:Almost all of their films are more profound, witty and intelligent than anything Disney have released after Sleeping Beauty. And Akira, while brilliant, isn't even a Ghibli movie. Ignorance is a bless, I guess.dvdjunkie wrote:Why?? "Spirited Away" was the only decent film in the past 20 years. I take that back, "Akira" is also in my collection. Don't understand what all the hoopla is over a these films.
How dare he state an opinion!DisneyJedi wrote: Scamander, how dare you? A majority of Disney's films after Sleeping Beauty were profound, witty and intelligent, thank you very much.
This post is dropping my I.Qthelittleursula wrote: This thread is dropping my IQ
Nope. Just someone who's whiney and can't handle someone opinion which is more objective than most people want to believe.thelittleursula wrote:Somebody sane ! Hallelujah !DisneyJedi wrote:
Scamander, how dare you? A majority of Disney's films after Sleeping Beauty were profound, witty and intelligent, thank you very much.
Thank you. This. You also already explained the Hunchback reason too.Jules wrote:I think I kind of agree with Scamander, but I do love the Disney films, promise.
DisneyJedi and thelittleursula: The Ghibli films may feel more profound because they are not made to necessarily appeal to kids. Most of the WDAS films were made to be family-friendly, and as result the film-makers were limited as to the maturity and breadth of emotions and story ideas they could portray. I'm pretty sure there's tremendous talent at WDAS, and I think there's mutual respect between the two studios, but I think the Japanese artists are luckier because they are allowed to tackle subject matter that Disney management would never allow the WDAS artists to touch with a ten foot pole.
That's why Ghibli make films like Grave of the Fireflies, Ocean Waves, From Up On Poppy Hill, or The Wind Rises. Don't get me wrong, there's probably nothing in these films that is inappropriate for children (an adult film need not be necessarily full of cursing, blood and sex ...), but Disney executives would greatly discourage any director at WDAS (or Pixar) at attempting to tell such stories. They probably reason that children will be bored with an animated drama.![]()
I still am hopeful for a profound and artistic film from WDAS, however. Though I don't think it will happen while Lasseter is chief creative officer.
The reason Ghilibi films don't dumb down is because, Japanese films are first and foremost catering to Japanese audience. Japanese have a totally different culture and outlook on things than we do. And their entertainment taste also goes along with it. Japanese tend to go for more story orientated stories and focus on emotions, philosophies and themes. Where as American films tend to go bit difference direction in focusing on humor/comedy, and action. In fact the clear difference can be told even withing Disney itself. Compare Tangled's and Frozen's marketing between the two and the culture/taste differences becomes clear as day.









