DisneyFan09 wrote:Btw, it's surprising that Disney didn't cast any Latin American actors for the parts. And the movie got away with no criticism against the Inca's. Had it been released today, I bet the criticism would've been worse.
You're talking about KOTS or TENG there?
Well tbh there aren't any Peruvian actors in the newer film either (and saying peruvian because for authenticity and because peruvian audiences wouldn't care to see a movie about their culture portrayed by mexicans or argentinians, not the same thing, it's like doing Mulan with Japanese voice actors. Big problem of most outside LA media is that they mix all latino cultures into one homogenous melting pot or they think they're just Mexico x20 (hi, Elena)).
Well, about the Incas, at least TENG just sorta treats it normal. They just chose the setting but didn't really add so much "cultural" stuff into it (like say, Mulan with filial piety or Aladdin with magic carpets), and i guess people just didn't take it so seriously since the film doesn't take itself seriously. I figure if the movie had been done in another setting it would've been the same thing. And I think this works sorta good when you make films with POC leads, the moment you try to add "cultural" elements you run the thin line of turning everything into a boring, preachy stereotype (Pocahontas and the Magical Native stereotype the film carries throughout). And that's where the problem begins. Instead, treating the film and characters normal as other white characters reduces stereotypes.
And either way I suppose nobody comments on it similar to how nobody commented on Brother Bear casting a white man to play a native. I guess they didn't notice or just didn't care for the movie.
Now onto KOTS.
This one has MUCH more cultural elements: mythology, religion, Huaca (which is really weird- huacas are known as ancient incan mountains where they laid the dead to rest (they're littered everywhere throughout Peru, you can even find some in the middle of the capital city, Lima). why would you name the cute disney sidekick after a religious and grim aspect...)...
There were sacrifices in Incan civilization, but they much more brutal (the victims were children or weak people). i doubt Disney would ever show that, though, so I can see why they changed it to llamas.
And the mythology/religion is sorta right- the incas believed the Inca was the sucesor of the Sun/the Sun in flesh and blood, so he was treated quite almighty. About the Supai stuff is sorta accurate but I wouldn't be surprised if it's simplified ala Hades from Hercules.
Overall I'm not bothered by the cultural aspects here (except Huaca, and that mostly ties with how uneven the tone of the film seems at this stage- it wants to be ultra dark and scary and serious but the next moment we have to have funny llamas), but i guess there's somebody out there who wouldn't like it. Though I wouldn't be surprised if not many would comment about it. I doubt many people know or care about Incan history.