Walt Disney Princess Academy (Short Fan Film Project)

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
Jay
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1509
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:03 pm
Location: US

Post by Jay »

The image of them all on the boat is so gorgeous. I love that Alice's sister is there I always thought she was one of the most beautiful female characters lol. She looks like a brunette Cinderella.
User avatar
Atlantica
Signature Collection
Posts: 5445
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:33 am
Location: UK

Post by Atlantica »

Jay wrote:The image of them all on the boat is so gorgeous. I love that Alice's sister is there I always thought she was one of the most beautiful female characters lol. She looks like a brunette Cinderella.
Gosh, I never noticed that before, but she does! I always thought she looked extremely lifelike, much like Alice does, but the Cinderella influence is there.
User avatar
271286
Special Edition
Posts: 666
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 7:44 am
Location: Denmark

Re: Walt Disney Princess Academy (Short Film Project)

Post by 271286 »

I find this picture VERY interesting... I love how all the characters are 100% on model, we rarely see this today... I also love how the line art is the same as in the original respective movies... Beautiful work, I think this guy has a bright future at Disney...

Image[/quote]
DancingCrab
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1030
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:20 pm

Post by DancingCrab »

A couple new images up...


Image


Image
DisneyDude2010
Special Edition
Posts: 815
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:48 am

Post by DisneyDude2010 »

What a great idea! The art work looks beautiful!

In the dance scene i can see Ariel in the background! :P

This must be fairly recent to have included Tiana and Rapunzel!
Image
All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them. - Walt Disney
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

The problem with this whole thing is that it's just one big giant fangasm project.

This is exactly what Disney should not be making.
User avatar
SWillie!
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2564
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:28 am

Post by SWillie! »

PatrickvD wrote:The problem with this whole thing is that it's just one big giant fangasm project.

This is exactly what Disney should not be making.
Yeah, I agree. Some people seem to be treating this like the real deal. This is literally no different than any other piece of fanart. Disney is not associated with this, nor will they ever be.
User avatar
Sky Syndrome
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1187
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:07 am
Location: Maine

Post by Sky Syndrome »

I love all this artwork! In the dance picture, is that Jessica Rabbit on the far right between Cindy and Pocahontas?
Image
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Post by Disney Duster »

SWillie! wrote:
miklc wrote:I would also be very interested to see Rapunzel animated in hand drawn animation :D
It would be blasphemy in my book to let someone besides Glen Keane animate Rapunzel traditionally at this point.
You'd never let anyone else animated her? Do you also feel no one but Marc Davis could animate Maleficent or something? Because other people did.
Image
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16239
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Post by Disney's Divinity »

PatrickvD wrote: This is exactly what Disney should not be making.
I don’t think anyone is delusional enough to expect Disney would ever get behind something like this.

But as for this being something they should not make--why? I can’t imagine this could be worse than the routine crap they’ve been shoveling out for the past 10+ years, and I would imagine it might even have more potential than most because at least they would have some small amount of respect for their old characters.
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ ~ "The Fate of Ophelia"
Taylor Swift ~ "Eldest Daughter"
Taylor Swift ~ "CANCELLED!"
User avatar
Atlantica
Signature Collection
Posts: 5445
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:33 am
Location: UK

Post by Atlantica »

Again, another lovely peice of art from these guys. Really are a talented bunch!
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

DancingCrab wrote: Image
That's based on an actual famous painting called Large Odalisque by Jean-auguste- Dominique Ingres

Image
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

Disney's Divinity wrote:
PatrickvD wrote: This is exactly what Disney should not be making.
I don’t think anyone is delusional enough to expect Disney would ever get behind something like this.

But as for this being something they should not make--why? I can’t imagine this could be worse than the routine crap they’ve been shoveling out for the past 10+ years, and I would imagine it might even have more potential than most because at least they would have some small amount of respect for their old characters.
I'm sorry but this fan-fiction type of stuff is not what I consider respect for their existing characters. At all. Let's agree to disagree right here. :)
User avatar
SWillie!
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2564
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:28 am

Post by SWillie! »

Disney Duster wrote:
SWillie! wrote: It would be blasphemy in my book to let someone besides Glen Keane animate Rapunzel traditionally at this point.
You'd never let anyone else animated her? Do you also feel no one but Marc Davis could animate Maleficent or something? Because other people did.
No, I don't mean that. I just meant specifically with Rapunzel, given the history of the character and the film. The fact that he developed the story for so long in multiple versions, and the character herself is such a labor of love, and then he never got animate her the way he wanted to... I just think that if Rapunzel ever did have some sort of hand drawn cameo in something, it should be Glen. I'm sure there are others that could do it, but since Glen is gone now I'd love to see him come back for something like that.
User avatar
pap64
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Post by pap64 »

PatrickvD wrote:The problem with this whole thing is that it's just one big giant fangasm project.

This is exactly what Disney should not be making.
EXACTLY what I was going to say.

This project does hold a lot of promise, and would be a beautiful piece if done correctly. But this looks to be nothing but a vanity project that the creators hope to sell at Disney, when it is likely that Disney will turn it away quickly.

The first is the idea of all these characters coming together. For some odd reason Disney has this strict rule about how their characters interact with each other (how House of Mouse was greenlit I'll never know), so making a whole short about the characters interacting with each other outside their respective universes would be killing it.

Second is the fanservice aspect of it all. Once again, this would be a nice piece for the fans to enjoy. But what value will it hold outside the rabid Disney fans that this was made for? What about everybody else? Nowadays Disney is all about pleasing all demographics, not just their die hard fans.

Let us not forget that Disney tried to do this sort of thing with that Pomp and Circumstance short with all the Disney characters. If DISNEY THEMSELVES saw it silly to make a short that's nothing but fan service, what chance does an artist best known for over sexualizing Disney characters has? Sorry if I am sounding oddly cynical, but the guy is WAY over his head (that and he has a really annoying vendetta against the CG movies except for Tangled, and even then he quickly dismissed it in favor of the Princess and the Frog)
ImageImageImageImage

Image
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

pap64 wrote: but the guy is WAY over his head (that and he has a really annoying vendetta against the CG movies except for Tangled, and even then he quickly dismissed it in favor of the Princess and the Frog)
Are you referring to david kawana or the other dude?
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
User avatar
pap64
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Post by pap64 »

Super Aurora wrote:
pap64 wrote: but the guy is WAY over his head (that and he has a really annoying vendetta against the CG movies except for Tangled, and even then he quickly dismissed it in favor of the Princess and the Frog)
Are you referring to david kawana or the other dude?
David Kawena. When Princess and the Frog came out, he wouldn't stop talking about it and drew several pieces of art in its honor. He even went as far as to believe that the movie had the chance to dethrone The Lion King as the biggest animated film ever.

Yet, when Tangled came out, he did nothing but "protest art" saying that it should have been in 2D, that it was generic etc. Heck, he didn't even go see the film right away. It wasn't until he ACTUALLY saw the movie then read the "art of" book that he finally gave the film credit, and finally gave Flynn Rider the chance to pose half naked in a piece.

I don't know, I understand that the beauty of Disney lies in most of their hand drawn features. But it seems rather hypocritical to claim to be a huge Disney fan, yet completely dismiss some of their effort because it is not in your preferred medium of animation.
ImageImageImageImage

Image
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

pap64 wrote:
Super Aurora wrote: Are you referring to david kawana or the other dude?
David Kawena. When Princess and the Frog came out, he wouldn't stop talking about it and drew several pieces of art in its honor. He even went as far as to believe that the movie had the chance to dethrone The Lion King as the biggest animated film ever.

Yet, when Tangled came out, he did nothing but "protest art" saying that it should have been in 2D, that it was generic etc. Heck, he didn't even go see the film right away. It wasn't until he ACTUALLY saw the movie then read the "art of" book that he finally gave the film credit, and finally gave Flynn Rider the chance to pose half naked in a piece.

I don't know, I understand that the beauty of Disney lies in most of their hand drawn features. But it seems rather hypocritical to claim to be a huge Disney fan, yet completely dismiss some of their effort because it is not in your preferred medium of animation.
Ah thought so. I never really like him either.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16239
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Post by Disney's Divinity »

PatrickvD wrote: I'm sorry but this fan-fiction type of stuff is not what I consider respect for their existing characters. At all. Let's agree to disagree right here. :)
I don't consider this a fanfiction in the slightest sense, so I can't be as dismissive as you are of anything that pairs characters from different films together. And I wouldn't consider it "fan service" either.

It’s no different to me than, say, Kingdom Hearts, which has a huge fan base and has been very successful for Disney. (or current or past games like Castle of Illusion, Epic Mickey, etc.) I don’t consider that in any way “fan service” or a “fangasm,” but an attempt to blend interesting characters into a story that is new, creative, and entertaining. Not everything in that vein comes off as cheesy as the P&C short sounded (that short was no doubt created for prepubescent fans of the DP line anyway, only with touches for general fans).
(that and [DavidKawena] has a really annoying vendetta against the CG movies except for Tangled, and even then he quickly dismissed it in favor of the Princess and the Frog)
I don’t agree with that at all; maybe he just doesn’t like any of their CG films prior to Tangled--arguably, most of them are pretty bad, and garishly so in some cases. Besides, even if that were the case, he wouldn’t need approval to prefer one medium over another; there is such a thing as personal taste. Moreover, I think it's outrageous to call him a hypocrite because of it. As far as I know, he could care less about most live-action Disney films at all. I find you to be the hypocrite for dismissing someone just because he doesn't cater to your view of what a Disney fan should be, based on vague ideas taken from a deviant art account.
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ ~ "The Fate of Ophelia"
Taylor Swift ~ "Eldest Daughter"
Taylor Swift ~ "CANCELLED!"
User avatar
SWillie!
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2564
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:28 am

Post by SWillie! »

Disney's Divinity is secretly David Kawena. :p
Post Reply