The National Film Registry

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Disney Duster »

Cinderella got inducted Wedsndsay, December 12, 2018. 12 like midnight!
Image
User avatar
Farerb
Signature Collection
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 2:09 pm

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Farerb »

When will the 2019 films be announced?
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21073
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Sotiris »

The 2019 films have been announced. Sleeping Beauty and Old Yeller have been inducted. Full list of films in the link below:

https://deadline.com/2019/12/national-f ... 202806279/
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Farerb
Signature Collection
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 2:09 pm

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Farerb »

That's really great to hear. Sleeping Beauty truly deserves it.
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16239
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Disney's Divinity »

Every year there's a film they induct that I'm shocked wasn't already in the NFR. Old Yeller is one of those.
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ ~ "The Fate of Ophelia"
Taylor Swift ~ "Eldest Daughter"
Taylor Swift ~ "CANCELLED!"
Avaitor
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2209
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:35 pm

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Avaitor »

Both really do deserve it.

There's a lot of really good additions this year, including a few of my favorites- Clerks, Coal Miner's Daughter, and Amadeus. Also noteworthy is Gaslight, which I believe has Angela Lansbury's first performance. On the Disney side, I'm hoping for a Jungle Book addition next year.
User avatar
Farerb
Signature Collection
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 2:09 pm

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Farerb »

My hopes are for basically every Signature Collection title that isn't already there + Alice in Wonderland.
I don't know what's the status of films with DI and if they are eligible cause they don't really need preservation but if they can enter then WALL-E would be a nice addition as well.
User avatar
JeanGreyForever
Signature Collection
Posts: 5335
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 5:29 pm

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by JeanGreyForever »

So glad to see both films, especially Sleeping Beauty added. I hope Alice in Wonderland gets the same treatment someday.
Avaitor wrote:Both really do deserve it.

There's a lot of really good additions this year, including a few of my favorites- Clerks, Coal Miner's Daughter, and Amadeus. Also noteworthy is Gaslight, which I believe has Angela Lansbury's first performance. On the Disney side, I'm hoping for a Jungle Book addition next year.
I'm really shocked Gaslight wasn't in there before. I love Angela Lansbury's performance in that.
ImageImage
We’re a dyad in the Force. Two that are one.
"I offered you my hand once. You wanted to take it." - Kylo Ren
"I did want to take your hand. Ben's hand." - Rey
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16239
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Disney's Divinity »

Avaitor wrote:Both really do deserve it.

There's a lot of really good additions this year, including a few of my favorites- Clerks, Coal Miner's Daughter, and Amadeus. Also noteworthy is Gaslight, which I believe has Angela Lansbury's first performance. On the Disney side, I'm hoping for a Jungle Book addition next year.
Oh, that’s wonderful. I didn’t open the website because Deadline is always difficult to load for my dial-up connection and I thought I'd check out more about the inductees later. :lol: Thanks.
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ ~ "The Fate of Ophelia"
Taylor Swift ~ "Eldest Daughter"
Taylor Swift ~ "CANCELLED!"
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Disney Duster »

Yes, congratulations to Sleeping Beauty! I didn't expect it to get in before certain others, but it totally makes sense. It's a masterpiece aesthetically!
Image
User avatar
estefan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3195
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:27 pm

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by estefan »

farerb wrote:I don't know what's the status of films with DI and if they are eligible cause they don't really need preservation but if they can enter then WALL-E would be a nice addition as well.
A movie has to be at least ten years old in order to be eligible to enter (Toy Story actually got in the first year it was eligible in 2005), so Wall-E became eligible last year. I wouldn't be surprised if more Pixar films are eventually added in the future.
"There are two wolves and they are always fighting. One is darkness and despair. The other is light and hope. Which wolf wins? Whichever one you feed." - Casey Newton, Tomorrowland
User avatar
Farerb
Signature Collection
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 2:09 pm

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Farerb »

estefan wrote:
farerb wrote:I don't know what's the status of films with DI and if they are eligible cause they don't really need preservation but if they can enter then WALL-E would be a nice addition as well.
A movie has to be at least ten years old in order to be eligible to enter (Toy Story actually got in the first year it was eligible in 2005), so Wall-E became eligible last year. I wouldn't be surprised if more Pixar films are eventually added in the future.
Yes. But Toy Story isn't a film which was originally presented in DCP so it needs preservation, unlike Pixar films who came out after 2005.

Edit: nevermind. I saw that yes you can add films with DCP. Though I don't know how much I'll want Pixar films in yhere before many Walt's films.
User avatar
Rumpelstiltskin
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1306
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 9:05 pm
Gender: Male

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Rumpelstiltskin »

As most people are aware, Sleeping Beauty was considered a failure during its first run. Walt Disney himself would have felt satisfied that at least the future would give it some recognition.
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Disney Duster »

That's true Rumplestiltskin!
Image
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16239
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Disney's Divinity »

Wasn't Sleeping Beauty the biggest film of 1959 though? Its budget was more to blame than anything else, just like with Tangled. It wasn't really a failure with audiences the way The Black Cauldron, Treasure Planet, Atlantis, etc. were.
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ ~ "The Fate of Ophelia"
Taylor Swift ~ "Eldest Daughter"
Taylor Swift ~ "CANCELLED!"
User avatar
Farerb
Signature Collection
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 2:09 pm

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Farerb »

Disney's Divinity wrote:Wasn't Sleeping Beauty the biggest film of 1959 though? Its budget was more to blame than anything else, just like with Tangled. It wasn't really a failure with audiences the way The Black Cauldron, Treasure Planet, Atlantis, etc. were.
Yes. That's what I heard. It was the second most successful film in 1959 but still lost money because of its budget.
User avatar
UmbrellaFish
Signature Collection
Posts: 5717
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:09 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him)

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by UmbrellaFish »

It is the second most successful film of 1959 including all re-releases. In 1959, Sleeping Beauty didn’t crack the top ten and grossed less than Disney’s The Shaggy Dog, also released that year. In Walt’s lifetime, Sleeping Beauty was definitely considered a failure.
User avatar
Farerb
Signature Collection
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 2:09 pm

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Farerb »

UmbrellaFish wrote:It is the second most successful film of 1959 including all re-releases. In 1959, Sleeping Beauty didn’t crack the top ten and grossed less than Disney’s The Shaggy Dog, also released that year. In Walt’s lifetime, Sleeping Beauty was definitely considered a failure.
That makes more sense. Thank you for this correction.
User avatar
Disney's Divinity
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16239
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
Gender: Male

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by Disney's Divinity »

UmbrellaFish wrote:It is the second most successful film of 1959 including all re-releases. In 1959, Sleeping Beauty didn’t crack the top ten and grossed less than Disney’s The Shaggy Dog, also released that year. In Walt’s lifetime, Sleeping Beauty was definitely considered a failure.
In their original runs, The Shaggy Dog made 8.1 million and Sleeping Beauty made 7.7 million.

Anyway I'd recommend this thread for others who want better info. than I could give. Those numbers also come from there. Although I did do an estimated ticket sales list several years ago, and Sleeping Beauty's original release is right below its "including all re-releases" total and both are in the top 10, although I haven't updated the list in a while.
Image
Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ ~ "The Fate of Ophelia"
Taylor Swift ~ "Eldest Daughter"
Taylor Swift ~ "CANCELLED!"
User avatar
UmbrellaFish
Signature Collection
Posts: 5717
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:09 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him)

Re: The National Film Registry

Post by UmbrellaFish »

A listing from Variety in 1961 says it earned the studio $5.3 million. https://archive.org/details/variety221-1961-01/page/n47

Escapay would know better, of course, so maybe he will pop in.
Post Reply