Last Chat session: Sunday, November 30th
-
Tangela
-
Tangela
-
indianajdp
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1813
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 7:10 pm
- Location: Central Hoosierland
Tangela--
You put together a poll and invited people to basically vote for or against you, so you can't be surprised that folks would vote "no". Along those lines, you can't take things personally.
I don't know what folks' reasons are for voting yes or no. You did a nice job organizing things last week but perhaps people think you are trying to organize chats way too often even after Luke stated it could be a contributing factor in the end-of-the-month bandwidth issues.
Whatever the reasoning, don't take it personally. It's not a knock against you or your efforts...unless of course somone votes "no" and then follows that up with a post that says "Tangela you suck!!!". THAT is something you could take personally
You put together a poll and invited people to basically vote for or against you, so you can't be surprised that folks would vote "no". Along those lines, you can't take things personally.
I don't know what folks' reasons are for voting yes or no. You did a nice job organizing things last week but perhaps people think you are trying to organize chats way too often even after Luke stated it could be a contributing factor in the end-of-the-month bandwidth issues.
Whatever the reasoning, don't take it personally. It's not a knock against you or your efforts...unless of course somone votes "no" and then follows that up with a post that says "Tangela you suck!!!". THAT is something you could take personally
" There's no Dumbass Vaccine " - Jimmy Buffett
Certain things don't really need a poll, Tangela. Bandwidth issues are a consideration, but if need be, we'll just have to pay for more at the end of the month. People who want to chat are going to, and those who don't, won't. I'm not sure what the purpose of the poll is - exactly - and I haven't voted. I do appreciate the effort given - but I do think Chat on AIM or something like that would be more customizable, reliable, and a complete save on bandwidth. But that assumes people have and use AIM or something comparable.
I don't know what to say.
I don't know what to say.
-
Tangela
I know that Luke, I just plced the Poll so that I would know if the people that were with us the other days enjoyed the chat session that I had...Luke wrote:Certain things don't really need a poll, Tangela. Bandwidth issues are a consideration, but if need be, we'll just have to pay for more at the end of the month. People who want to chat are going to, and those who don't, won't. I'm not sure what the purpose of the poll is - exactly - and I haven't voted. I do appreciate the effort given - but I do think Chat on AIM or something like that would be more customizable, reliable, and a complete save on bandwidth. But that assumes people have and use AIM or something comparable.
I don't know what to say.
I placed that poll thinking that people would give me some reasons why or shouldn't I organize chat sessions like this.
-
Tangela
Well, so far I only did too chat sessions. The first one came because I thought the chat room was always empty. And the second one on Tuesday was only there because it was a holiday...indianajdp wrote:Tangela--
You put together a poll and invited people to basically vote for or against you, so you can't be surprised that folks would vote "no". Along those lines, you can't take things personally.
I don't know what folks' reasons are for voting yes or no. You did a nice job organizing things last week but perhaps people think you are trying to organize chats way too often even after Luke stated it could be a contributing factor in the end-of-the-month bandwidth issues.
Whatever the reasoning, don't take it personally. It's not a knock against you or your efforts...unless of course somone votes "no" and then follows that up with a post that says "Tangela you suck!!!". THAT is something you could take personally
Besides, Luke agreed to have a chat session on Sunday and I stated that too. I'm always trying to save the most bw, that's why I was trying to install a php chat on another site, so that we could use that one instead of Luke's and save the bw (Which I think is $5.99 a can in Dominick's
) So... The poll was meant to bring people to the thread giving suggestions and stuff.
-
Tangela
Well, today's session was pretty bad, the most people we had there together at once was four. We had a total of 9 different users. I don't think there will be any more Organized Chat Sessions (OCS) in a while, since Luke hasn't approved, nor denied. Hava a great day everyone. Hope to see you next time so that we can break another record.
-
Tangela
-
Tangela
-
Prince Adam
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: The Great, Wide Somewhere (Ont, Canada)
Don't take this personally, but I think that 5 consecutive posts without replies would take up bandwidth.
Oh, I just realized that maybe you just thought of different things to say later on. But you kinda seem to repeat yourself...
But hey, Rescuers is awesome (trying to suck up so you won't get mad )
Oh, I just realized that maybe you just thought of different things to say later on. But you kinda seem to repeat yourself...
But hey, Rescuers is awesome (trying to suck up so you won't get mad
)Defy Gravity...
-
Tangela
-
Prince Adam
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: The Great, Wide Somewhere (Ont, Canada)
