CINDERELLA DVD - digital restoration gone too far?

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
BATBfan1

Post by BATBfan1 »

WOW, drsd2kill...
you openned up doors for me when Disney says the RESTORED a classic. I am thinking they REDRAW the classic instead! My poor Beauty and the Beast. At least Cinderella isn't THAT BAD. Look at BATB and you will love the Cinderella redrawen, i mean RESTORED DVD. ;)

It's a shame Disney cannot just leave their movies ALONE!
What money does to ya. :roll:
Dottie
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2576
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: The Pie-Hole
Contact:

Post by Dottie »

I think BatB lokked simply stunning after the resoration for the IMAX theaters!! But, in my opinion thy have gone a bit too far with Cinderella. Her ballgown looks more blue than sparkling silver. On the other hand I personally like the pastel. :D
User avatar
musicradio77
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Contact:

Post by musicradio77 »

Hennie wrote:you put a lot of work in these pictures! But very nice to see this though, the worst is the picture below, why change things :roll:

Image
Wow! "Cinderella" had a ultra rare RKO logo. :o The PE DVD I have contains the old Walt Disney Pictures logo (except the restoration end credits) as well as the 1995 VHS release had the Buena Vista logo on it, both of them had blocked the RKO logo. Great find, the mystery was solved!
Edge
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 311
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 5:14 am
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA

Post by Edge »

Eh, the new colors seem nice to me I like what they did.
User avatar
skyler888
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 352
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 4:30 pm

Post by skyler888 »

now they re-drew some scenes for Beauty and the Beast for the IMAX release and then they would later be on the special edition DVD. But on the DVD would the original theatrical release version on actually be the "Original Theatrical "version or would it just be the same IMAX version just without human again?


....if this makes sense :roll:
ichabod
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4676
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 8:29 am
Location: The place where they didn't build EuroDisney
Contact:

Post by ichabod »

Yes on the DVD the 'original' version, is not the 'original version', it is the IMAX version without Human Again.
User avatar
271286
Special Edition
Posts: 666
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 7:44 am
Location: Denmark

Post by 271286 »

ichabod wrote:Yes on the DVD the 'original' version, is not the 'original version', it is the IMAX version without Human Again.
It is NOT!

If you view the "original version" on the BaTB DVD is is in fact the original version, the redrawn scenes are replaced by the original scenes...

Example: The scene where Belle says goodbye to The Beast (after seing her father in the magic mirror) originally had a background with torn wallpaper, in the "Special Edition" edition this is rewdrawn - and the wallpaper is intact. But if you watch the "Original Version" on the DVD is still has the background with the torn wallpaper...

So the DVD does actually have both versions... Allthough the colors are corrected and the picture is igitally restored in both versions...
User avatar
Disneykid
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 9:10 am
Location: Wonderland

Post by Disneykid »

Actually, you're both right, and you're both wrong. Let me explain (this is kind of complicated, so bear with me):

The IMAX and "theatrical" versions on the DVD are exactly the same for the first hour or so (I can't remember when exactly "Human Again" shows up running-time wise.) When "Something There" finishes on both versions, then they split up for the next 15 minutes. The IMAX version shows "Human Again" and because of that, shows redone backgrounds. The "theatrical" one goes to the Beast prepping for the big night, so we see the original backgrounds of the destroyed rooms. Each version goes its own separate way up until the point where Belle rides off with Phillipe. After that scene, both versions meet up once again. Why? Because the filmmakers realized how time consuming it'd be to re-do ALL of the backgrounds for the IMAX version for last half hour of the movie. So what did they do? They added sound effects of the Beast destroying the West Wing in frusturation as we see Belle riding off. This is why in the IMAX version, the West Wing and other parts of the castle look destroyed the way they originally did. This is also why both versions are the same on the DVD for the last half hour or so. So to sum it up, we do get the true theatrical version of Beauty and the Beast on DVD: a whopping 15 minutes of it. IMAX changes like the Beast's stuttering and more blood added during the wolf fight are present in the theatrical one, as well. The Work-in-Progress version we get on the DVD isn't even the original one, but let's not get into that issue...
User avatar
271286
Special Edition
Posts: 666
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 7:44 am
Location: Denmark

Post by 271286 »

Disneykid wrote:Actually, you're both right, and you're both wrong. Let me explain (this is kind of complicated, so bear with me):

The IMAX and "theatrical" versions on the DVD are exactly the same for the first hour or so (I can't remember when exactly "Human Again" shows up running-time wise.) When "Something There" finishes on both versions, then they split up for the next 15 minutes. The IMAX version shows "Human Again" and because of that, shows redone backgrounds. The "theatrical" one goes to the Beast prepping for the big night, so we see the original backgrounds of the destroyed rooms. Each version goes its own separate way up until the point where Belle rides off with Phillipe. After that scene, both versions meet up once again. Why? Because the filmmakers realized how time consuming it'd be to re-do ALL of the backgrounds for the IMAX version for last half hour of the movie. So what did they do? They added sound effects of the Beast destroying the West Wing in frusturation as we see Belle riding off. This is why in the IMAX version, the West Wing and other parts of the castle look destroyed the way they originally did. This is also why both versions are the same on the DVD for the last half hour or so. So to sum it up, we do get the true theatrical version of Beauty and the Beast on DVD: a whopping 15 minutes of it. IMAX changes like the Beast's stuttering and more blood added during the wolf fight are present in the theatrical one, as well. The Work-in-Progress version we get on the DVD isn't even the original one, but let's not get into that issue...
Thanks for clearing that out.
User avatar
Poppins#1
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 244
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 11:46 am
Location: Portland, OR

Post by Poppins#1 »

Poppins#1 wrote:#4. I’ve taken a closer look at your screencaps. It’s like those puzzles where you’re supposed to pick out what is different. But now I see what you are talking about with the background being shifted in the dream sequence. Also in captures #1 and #2 they have made physical changes to the stepmother's dress. I agree that these tamperings are over-the-top and akin to painting a smile on the Mona Lisa
First of all let me say I was very troubled about this apparent tampering. So much so that I dug up my old Laserdisc to investigate it further. There's good news to report.
The apparent background shift in the dream sequence doesn't exist. It looks that way because the Laserdisc capture and DVD capture are not from the same frame in the movie. I have done a capture of the correct frame from my DVD and you can see it perfectly matches the LD capture by drsd2kill.


Image

Image

Now, as for the changes in the Stepmother's dress: You will notice the two sections of her dress at the bottom of the screen that have been recolored dark blue. On the Laserdisc they are the same light blue as her outer robe. However, watching the Laserdisc, after that shot there is a cut away to Cinderella and then a cut back to the Stepmother and two daughters where the sections of her dress are now the correct dark blue. The first shot was simply a mistake by the cell painters where they painted those two areas the wrong color. Lowry has simply corrected that mistake so the two shots now match.

Image
Image

Moving on to the shot where the stepmother has no left sleeve on the Laserdisc capture but does on the DVD capture. Watching the Laserdisc, I found that she DOES have a left sleeve in that shot, but there are 2 or 3 frames where the animator forgot to draw it on the cell. So watching the movie at normal speed the sleeve disappears for a fraction of a second. Again Lowry has corrected this error by putting the sleeve back into the frames where it was missing.

Image
Image

So, the tampering was by no means second-guessing the original intent, but rather correcting errors that I'm sure the filmmakers have always been unhappy with.
Last edited by Poppins#1 on Mon Aug 28, 2006 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
drsd2kill
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 10:54 pm

Date correction

Post by drsd2kill »

I apologize for giving the wrong date of the last Laserdisc release. The box set CAV Laserdisc of the restored version came out in October of 1995, not 1997. 10 years of technological advancements could've made that film master look so much better, but instead it has been "enhanced" into being something wholly other. :-(
drsd2kill
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 10:54 pm

corrections

Post by drsd2kill »

If you had been following the thread, I pointed out how those two animator/layout errors were corrected by Lowry, and that was one point I didn't have a problem with. I apologize for being a frame off in one of the captures.

However, did you notice the whites of the stepmother's eyes on the Laserdisc? So many people seem to want to defend the blue in the stepmother's eyes on the DVD release, but why does it fluctuate shot to shot? If it were in the original animation as photographed, wouldn't some semblance of it be in the previous video releases? It looks like automated laziness to me - poor quality control.
User avatar
Kram Nebuer
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1992
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 2:03 pm
Location: Happiest Place on Earth :)
Contact:

Post by Kram Nebuer »

Wow, this is a very nit-picky thread! I agree with Edge, I don't really care about the mistakes in the restorations because the restored version looks great to me. On the other hand, it is rather disappointing that the original intentions of the artists or whatever were changed.

Also I just thought of something. I remember seeing on one of the bonus features of Snow White (or maybe another restored DAC) that they restored the film up to the point so that it'll be like you're looking at the actual animation cel and backgrounds of the movie (and not to look like a new, clean print).

Sorry to continue off-topic but...
Disneykid wrote:Each version goes its own separate way up until the point where Belle rides off with Phillipe. After that scene, both versions meet up once again. Why? Because the filmmakers realized how time consuming it'd be to re-do ALL of the backgrounds for the IMAX version for last half hour of the movie. So what did they do? They added sound effects of the Beast destroying the West Wing in frusturation as we see Belle riding off. This is why in the IMAX version, the West Wing and other parts of the castle look destroyed the way they originally did.
Hehe, I remember in the audio commentary, I think Don Hahn explained how they got annoyed that they'd have to change all that animation so he said something like "Beast trashed the place again after Belle left." :lol:
Image
<a href=http://kramnebuer.dvdaf.com/>My ºoº DVDs </a>
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

OK, after studying a few episodes of Most Haunted last night, I felt confident enough to hold a séance to contact DeathieMouse from "The Twilight Zone". Please excuse any spelling mistakes, you won't believe how long and laborious it is to write down his wisdom when you have to note down every single letter one at a time as the glass moves to it on the Ouija Board. And its not as if he moved that glass quickly. Oh no. On Most Haunted it goes flying over the board. Not with our Deathie. It was like a snail was pushing the thing. Not to mention the pesky interference from unwanted spirits! You're halfway through a transcription and then a book goes flying across the room, thrown by an evil spirit from your bookcase. It is rather off-putting and can ruin your train of thought.

The things I do for Ultimate Disney. Anyway, without further ado, here's what DeathieMouse said about my post on NTSC colours, and the new DVD transfer in general.

OK DVDs are encoded in some form of Yuv
RGB is separated into b/w (Y) and colour differences (uv) and the color is quartered (made 1/4th the size/resolution) (so a image that's 3GB becomes 1.5 with the b/w being 1 (untouched) and the colour being 0.5 (quartered)
NTSC has trouble with colours because:
Originally: 1 NTSC is the NTSC phosphorus gamma 2.2, black = 0 IRE
but phosphors on tvs weren't those!, gamma on a CRT s actually 2.25, and NTSC color set up is actually black = 7.5 ire
then, you have auto color and auto tint
AND! the reason for having a tint control was technically this: EVEN if you had everything above perfect, NTSC signals traveling though the airwaves and connectors over long distances changed chroma phase (tint)
PAL fixed that by using the "Phase Alternalte Line" system
Then on top, on NTSC the Yuv signal is further compressed into Yc
and the c is piggybacked onto the Y signal
so a TV has to separate those with a notch or comb filter
on broadcast and Laserdisc is that way (called composite). o VHS and S-VHS the signal is actually recorded as separate Y and c but if you dont get prerecorded tapes or your VCR dont have a S-video cable (actually a Y c cable) the YC merge piggyback is done on the way to your tv
(cus TV used to only accept NTSC composite remember?)
and all that was analog so it had frequency losses and noise
DVD is much better cus its Yuv COMPONENT DIGITAL
the only NTSC and PAL remaining is the 576 and 480 size. and interface
not even the aspect ratio is the same as i explained many times, 1.33 vs 1.37
so this is correct: "I believe DVD does not have these colour problems because they have a digital source, not encoded to NTSC on the disc"
this is correct but not exactly clear why,: "and digital cabling from player to monitor/TV".
its not the cabling per se, its that the signals are encoded separate (and of course the cabling keeps them separate in Yuv (the red green blue cablesc alled "component"
its just not RG
er RGB
its Y (b/w) u (red difference) v (blue difference)
(the green cable crries the Y)
now as to why colors are different
Cinderella was shot though a red 25 Green 58 and Blue 47 filters (or similar) (the RGB gel filters in some test discs )
into b/w film
thats a color record
then those b/w records were dyed with a set of yellow magenta and cyan dies that was manipulated to get the color you wanted (like playing with Photoshop colors! (a chemical photoshop!)
that was THE TECHNICOLOR IB PRINT AND THATS THE TRUE COLOR REFERENCE
the old videos were maybe made from Eastmancolor prints which look totally diferent
the new DVDs were made by scanning the b/w negatives into video RGB.
and referenced to the cels. not to the technicolor prints
so right there color is f**ked
a reflective cel can only have a contrast ratio of 100:1
(remember the maximum 2.5 dLog i mentioned the other day? ;)
a technicolor print has a contrast ratio of 5000:1 or more
so the contrast brilliance and saturation can be 50 times better than the cel
2nd problem
only a $6000 not designed for motion/gaming NEC LCD has colors approaching NTSC Technicolor. sRGB/HDTV/PAL/SMPTE "C" monitors have half the color
(SMPTE "C" is the phosphour set that after 40 years of NTSC wildness manufacturers agrree to use for $$$$$$$ profesional broadcast monitors. its like 95% of PAL (EBU) phosphours
sRGB/HDTV red and blue = PAL
sRGB/HDTV green is the average of the PAL and SMPTe green
(something like PAL green x = 0.28 y = 0.60 SMPT green = x = 0.32 y = 60
then sRGB/HDTV chose x = 0.30 y = 0.60
"The lines on characters appear to be thinner as well,"
thats good. that means its higher resolution
"such as the whites of the stepmother's eyes often being blue and how whites were quite dulled and gray" thats two reasons: the new transfer has acryall highlight detail instead of being blown out ("duller whites) a white cloth on a DVD should be at around 86% RGB (if black is 0% and pure white is 100%
the blue highlights is cus Lowry is still using Lucas uncalibrated monitor!
all lowry transferes are too blue or yellow!

I hope that makes sense to somebody, or else it wasn't just a whole night of mine wasted, but I've also infested by flat with evil spirits for nothing.

Disclaimer: Kids, don't mess around with Ouija Boards. It may just be nonsense, but its better to be safe than sorry. I suggest you use instant messaging instead. :)
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
User avatar
Poppins#1
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 244
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 11:46 am
Location: Portland, OR

Post by Poppins#1 »

:thumb: Good job Netty! :thumb:
User avatar
anger is pointless
Special Edition
Posts: 589
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:38 pm
Location: texas
Contact:

Post by anger is pointless »

they shouldnt fix the original mistakes they should just leave them alone
GO WIDE SCREEN AND SEE THE WHOLE MOVIE THE WAY IT WAS INTENDED
User avatar
jeremy88
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1119
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:03 am

OH THIS REMINDS ME!

Post by jeremy88 »

I just won a new Cinderella gift set box off eBay for an amazing price at only $20.63!! I was so excited because thats like the same exact price for Cinderella PE at the stores. Im like...well if Im paying the same price mite as well get extra stuff. Cinderella's not among my favorite Disney films, but I must admit it is a true classic and its a really good movie. Plus im excited becuase I havent seen it since i was like 4, so its like watching it for the first time again.
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c312/ ... sney-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
User avatar
271286
Special Edition
Posts: 666
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 7:44 am
Location: Denmark

Post by 271286 »

I have to say that i absolutely adore the restration work on all Platinum Editions, Especially TLK, BaTB and Cinderella... So forget how it looked 50 years ago... CARPE DIEM
Lars Vermundsberget
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Lars Vermundsberget »

271286 wrote:I have to say that i absolutely adore the restration work on all Platinum Editions, Especially TLK, BaTB and Cinderella... So forget how it looked 50 years ago... CARPE DIEM
It might look good, but if one gives in to this point of view entirely, I'd say important priciples are at stake (which might not be quite what you're saying here). One should at least try not to lose the original out of sight - unfortunately film elements and the colour of artwork tend to change over the decades. In some cases restorers need the memories of the original artists for reference. How dependable is that after fifty years?
ichabod
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4676
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 8:29 am
Location: The place where they didn't build EuroDisney
Contact:

Post by ichabod »

Lars Vermundsberget wrote:In some cases restorers need the memories of the original artists for reference. How dependable is that after fifty years?
More dependable however are original backgrounds are cels, which are stored safely in the vault. Even though they too are prone to discolouring, in the conditions they are stored they at least will be able to give a 99.9% realistic portrayal of the original colours.
Post Reply