DisneyJedi wrote:UmbrellaFish wrote:
It was a joke.
Sarcasm just doesn't always work right on UD.
The "Tangled" part, or the animated Hannah Montana and Snow Princess movies news?
The Hannah Montana and Snow Princess news was sarcasm, I was quite irritated at Disney (or at the suits/marketing departement at Disney to be exact) for this Tangled-business, which is true I'm sad to say (check out the links to Disney's Facebook-pages that I have posted a few posts back...)
However, I feel quite the same way you do about the future for Disney animation. Until January/February it seemed like Disney was on the right track and that we would have several new animated movies over the next few years, and now they are cancelled (Snow Queen, The King of Elves, Newt) and renamed (Rapunzel). To me it seems like Disney animation still is struggling and that we won't have a comeback of Disney (2D) animation if things do not change.
Disney needs to realise a few things:
1. It takes time to win the audiences back after all their sequals and after the Disney Princess-franchise has made most of their fairytale-movies "films for girls".
2. Just because one Disney-film "flops" (or, in the case with The Princess and the Frog, fails to meet expectations who are set waaay to high) it does not mean that people does not want to see traditionally animated movies or Disney-fairytales.
3. Disney should be Disney and make timeless movies, not hip and "cool" movies like DreamWorks. All their movies must not have to be 2D or fairytales, but they must not be afraid to make such movies. The "cool" and hip movies with animals constantly farting or telling pop-cultural jokes will be forgotten in 50 years, while a true Disney-classic will still be remembered.
4. Disney needs to get another attitude when it comes to marketing. Seriously, stop overanalyzing everything, all we hear is "gender", "demografic", "franchise" etc. What about focusing mostly on making good movies and not mainly on marketing and the box office?