
Source: https://www.facebook.com/DisneyDumbo/ph ... 925205169/

Source: https://www.facebook.com/DisneyDumbo/ph ... 281871800/

Source: https://www.facebook.com/DisneyDumbo/ph ... 478488647/
Official online destinations for Dumbo.
• Website




Indeed it was. Surprised by it being released so soon.disneyprincess11 wrote:Wow, that release was random!

Yes, it is. I think Disney Film Facts didn't have any exclusive info about the movie on this occasion, they just misinterpreted the reports from CinemaCon. The most interesting thing about Dumbo are his origins and the discovery that he can fly, it didn't make sense they would skip that and center only on what happens after that. I'm glad, though, there are enough new elements in the story to differentiate it from the original and to make it interesting.Sotiris wrote:It's clear now that this movie is a remake and not a sequel to the animated one as it was erroneously reported by Disney Film Facts.
It's true! I didn't notice it in my first viewing. The article explains he lost it in the war. I think the detail that he's a widower is also new. And I didn't Know the actress who plays his daughter in the film is Thandie Newton’s daughter.Toky wrote:Anyone noticed colin farell’s character is missing an arm...pretty dark and burtonesque



Thanks for posting it! While not my favorite rendition of the song (that's Alison Krauss' cover), it's still pretty good.D82 wrote:And Disney has released a preview of the "Baby Mine" cover used in the teaser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCLtxLUwBSs


Yes, it's very pretty, ethereal. I wonder if Mrs. Jumbo might be "put down" in this film (when she's driven off in the trailer)...? That would explain the eerie quality of the song, sort of like she's still taking care of and watching over Dumbo from the afterlife.Sotiris wrote:While not my favorite rendition of the song (that's Alison Krauss' cover), it's still pretty good.

It's definitely part of the story. In the trailer we see one of the girls holding it and using it to help Dumbo fly. She's playing the part Timothy did in the animated film. It seems the animals in this one won't be talking or be anthropomorphic. As for whose feather that is, I also think it might be Mr. Stork's.D82 wrote:I wonder if it will be part of the story or if it's just for the poster.
It's an interesting theory but I doubt Disney would be willing to take it as far as that with this one. This seems more of a feel-good movie. I think they'll just be separated at the beginning and reunited towards the end for the obljgatory happy ending.Disney's Divinity wrote:I wonder if Mrs. Jumbo might be "put down" in this film (when she's driven off in the trailer)...? That would explain the eerie quality of the song, sort of like she's still taking care of and watching over Dumbo from the afterlife.
Oh, it’s true! I hadn’t notice it was the feather what she holds in her hand. I knew the kids were substituting Timothy and the crows in this version, but I thought there was still a possibility that they could appear in a small role or a cameo like the mice in the live-action Cinderella. This, however, pretty much confirms they won't be in it at all. And, yes, it’s likely the feather is from a stork. We know because of the trailer that they’ll appear in the film, but do you think Dumbo will be delivered by a stork as in the animated movie? I have the feeling they won't do that here.Sotiris wrote:It's definitely part of the story. In the trailer we see one of the girls holding it and using it to help Dumbo fly.
Disney's Divinity wrote:I wonder if Mrs. Jumbo might be "put down" in this film (when she's driven off in the trailer)...? That would explain the eerie quality of the song, sort of like she's still taking care of and watching over Dumbo from the afterlife.
I didn't know about these two versions, the only cover of the song I had heard was the one on the DVD. Both are great, but my favorite is still the movie version. I love the way it's sung and the chorus. By the way, I've noticed all these covers have the same extra bridge. Where does it come from? Was there an extended version of the song in one of the first soundtracks for the movie, perhaps?Disney's Divinity wrote:Along with Krauss, I love Bette Midler's version, too.
At first I thought that might be too dark, too, but they did go with Tim Burton and the trailer is unexpectedly 'weird' for the Dumbo story. There's also a character missing an arm. I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility. Killing off parents to get tears is something Disney's known for.Sotiris wrote: It's an interesting theory but I doubt Disney would be willing to take it as far as that with this one. This seems more of a feel-good movie. I think they'll just be separated at the beginning and reunited towards the end for the obljgatory happy ending.
I have that Jim Brickman album. I love his piano arrangement, but Kassie Depaiva isn't a real standout for me. I'm not sure about where the bridge comes from either. That sounds like the kind of thing Sotiris might know though.D82 wrote: I didn't know about these two versions, the only cover of the song I had heard was the one on the DVD. Both are great, but my favorite is still the movie version. I love the way it's sung and the chorus. By the way, I've noticed all these covers have the same extra bridge. Where does it come from? Was there an extended version of the song in one of the first soundtracks for the movie, perhaps?

No, I don't. It looks like they're going for a more realistic approach to the story despite the fantastical premise of a flying elephant.D82 wrote:Do you think Dumbo will be delivered by a stork as in the animated movie? I have the feeling they won't do that here.
It came from early, licensed renditions of the song after the movie's release. It's a practice that goes back to Snow White. Due to the soundtrack's popularity, Disney included additional and provided alternate lyrics to Snow White's songs (particularly to Someday My Prince Will Come, I'm Wishing, and One Song) to make them into longer, 'proper' songs in order to accommodate all those singers and musicians who requested to cover them and rake in the money from licensing fees.D82 wrote:By the way, I've noticed all these covers have the same extra bridge. Where does it come from? Was there an extended version of the song in one of the first soundtracks for the movie, perhaps?
Yes, I agree. That's why I think they won't have him delivered by a stork too.Sotiris wrote:It looks like they're going for a more realistic approach to the story despite the fantastical premise of a flying elephant.
Interesting. I had noticed they had added lyrics to some versions of Disney songs, but I didn't know that practice was so common and that it started so early. Nor how it worked. Thanks, Sotiris, as Disney's Divinity said, we can always rely on you for this kind of info.Sotiris wrote:It came from early, licensed renditions of the song after the movie's release. It's a practice that goes back to Snow White. Due to the soundtrack's popularity, Disney included additional and provided alternate lyrics to Snow White's songs (particularly to Someday My Prince Will Come, I'm Wishing, and One Song) to make them into longer, 'proper' songs in order to accommodate all those singers and musicians who requested to cover them and rake in the money from licensing fees.

Maybe the feather is not from Mr. Stork after all. We don't know yet. There's a scene from the trailer where Mrs. Jumbo stares at a flock of white birds outside her cage. I'm not sure if they're storks or not but maybe the feather came from them.Disney Duster wrote:Why would they have a feather from Mr. Stork...but no storks deliver babies?