
Pinocchio
and
Fantasia
The animation of thse movies is still amazing, considering that both are already 70 years old!
I read it too!Goliath wrote:I'm just glad people actually *read* my rambling posts, as proved by you. Now I would be even more glad if people would also watch the films I recommend.
I always think that people who come here for entertainment, or to catch a break, or to just share harmless opinions, might skip overly lenghty posts about politics, especially in a non-political thread. But now I can say I have 'readers'!Wonderlicious wrote:I read it too!
Yes, the European media is very kind to president Da Silva, whereas it's very hostile toward president Chávez. I think it has a lot to do with style. Media nowadays are more concerned with style over substance. Chávez is really a populist, very loud and outspoken and passionate; whereas Da Silva fits 'our' image of a politician much more: calm, reasonable, looking for compromise rather than conflict. It also doesn't help that Chávez nationalized many Western corporations (mainly in the oil business)...Wonderlicious wrote:From European media and friends who know a bit about Latin America/Brazil, it's certainly evident that da Silva in particular is doing pretty some needed things at the moment.
Yes, but I was dissatisfied with the depth of Stone's film. Some of the time that could have been devoted to discussing the results of these presidents' policies, instead went to so-called 'funny' parts, like Stone playing soccer with president Morales (Bolivia). Actually, you can see Morales rolls his eyes in disbelief when Stone asks the translators if he could play soccer with the president.Wonderlicious wrote:Again, I don't know too much about Latin American politics (though I did know that the Venuzealan president is often vilified, for some reason I can't quite remember). All the more reason for me to watch the movie, I suppose.
Any intelligent right-winger who disapproves of Moore would really get a lot out of his Howard Stern interview. It was so eye-opening, full of personality (he's really easy to like behind the camera), and spoke in a language anyone would understand. After that, it's obvious to me that the hateful opinions are pure ignorance.Goliath wrote:Bowling for Columbine (2002)
I tend to get agitated when people discard this film because of the supposedly left-wing bias of Moore