Tangled Discussion Part VI: Let the Drama continue...

Elladorine · Post by **Elladorine** » Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:34 pm

Looks very much like their stock-style clipart to me actually.

DisneyDude2010 · Post by **DisneyDude2010** » Sat Jun 18, 2011 11:35 am

Thats what i thought

DisneyDude2010 · Post by **DisneyDude2010** » Sat Jun 18, 2011 11:35 am

Found this on toys are us ... apparently its a money box but i looks like clipart to me

Poody · Post by **Poody** » Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:49 pm

^I've seen that there. It looks nothing like that picture, but still pretty cool hahaha

Sotiris · Post by **Sotiris** » Sat Jun 18, 2011 1:41 pm

Tangled reference in The Princess and the Frog:

It was back when the film was still called Rapunzel. It even has the magical flower on the book!!

Sky Syndrome · Post by **Sky Syndrome** » Sat Jun 18, 2011 1:59 pm

That's so cool TPatF has a Tangled reference!

Maybe two Tangled references. When Dr. Facilier conjures an illusion of Tiana's resturant, the freestanding lamps bear a strong resemblance to the magical flower.

disneyprincess11 · Post by **disneyprincess11** » Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:38 pm

Sotiris wrote:Tangled reference in The Princess and the Frog:

It was back when the film was still called Rapunzel. It even has the magical flower on the book!!

Wow, great find! Someone needs to add this in IMDB!!!

disneyboy20022 · Post by **disneyboy20022** » Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:46 pm

disneyprincess11 wrote:
Sotiris wrote:Tangled reference in The Princess and the Frog:

It was back when the film was still called Rapunzel. It even has the magical flower on the book!!
Wow, great find! Someone needs to add this in IMDB!!!

Also on the shelf is a book of The Little Mermaid

Sky Syndrome · Post by **Sky Syndrome** » Sat Jun 18, 2011 5:56 pm

disneyprincess11 wrote:
Sotiris wrote:Tangled reference in The Princess and the Frog:

It was back when the film was still called Rapunzel. It even has the magical flower on the book!!
Wow, great find! Someone needs to add this in IMDB!!!

The book with the picture of Ariel from The Little Mermaid on Broadway poster at the bookstore during the Kingdom Dance montage isn't even on the trivia page and it was mentioned in this thread two months ago.

Super Aurora · Post by **Super Aurora** » Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:01 pm

Sotiris wrote:Tangled reference in The Princess and the Frog:

It was back when the film was still called Rapunzel. It even has the magical flower on the book!!

subliminal advertising propaganda.

ajmrowland · Post by **ajmrowland** » Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:13 pm

disneyboy20022 wrote:

Also on the shelf is a book of The Little Mermaid

Yeah, but it didnt include a prop that was actually in the movie

DisneyDude2010 · Post by **DisneyDude2010** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:55 am

Sotiris wrote:Tangled reference in The Princess and the Frog:

It was back when the film was still called Rapunzel. It even has the magical flower on the book!!

WOW

Great spotting

Hopefully Rapunzel will invite Tiana to her wedding

One can only imagine ...

Atlantica · Post by **Atlantica** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:27 pm

There is a little mermaid poster in Tangled ?!?!?!? I've been away from this thread for too long !!

And the short ?? I think that is a wonderful idea; a happy compromise between having a sequel/not having one. (Though why Pixar are allowed sequels left, right, and centre, and Disney aren't, is not something I understand......).

Atlantica · Post by **Atlantica** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:29 pm

And I will also really try and go to the official Princess ceremony !! It's just down the road from me, so there is no excuse

Disney's Divinity · Post by **Disney's Divinity** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 5:10 pm

atlanticaunderthesea wrote: (Though why Pixar are allowed sequels left, right, and centre, and Disney aren't, is not something I understand......).

I think it's because their sequels are generally high quality. I think both the TS sequels surpass the first, and that's saying something.

But the Cars sequels do feel like milking because of the successful merchandise. Of course, maybe Pixar was disappointed that the film was their least successful film (critically/financially), so they wanted to make up for it and bring more out of the characters? Possibly.

Elladorine · Post by **Elladorine** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 5:53 pm

Disney's Divinity wrote:Of course, maybe Pixar was disappointed that the film was their least successful film (critically/financially), so they wanted to make up for it and bring more out of the characters? Possibly.

I hadn't really thought of it that way, but to be fair I've always liked the original and think the sequel looks fun regardless. Cars seems well-liked by the general public; it's harshest critics seem to be the hardcore Disney animation fans. I know a lot of more casual movie fans that simply can't wait to see the sequel.

estefan · Post by **estefan** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 8:55 pm

I think Pixar also gets a pass sequel-wise, because their films are original concepts nor are they done by a secondary department. Most of Disney's animated features are based on old stories, not to mention their sequels are done by their television department and with little to no consent by the original filmmakers.

bruno_wbt · Post by **bruno_wbt** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:00 am

disneyprincess11 wrote:
DisneyDude2010 wrote:

this is like the only 2d image i like... is this fan made?
WOW! SHE LOOKS AMAZING IN THIS! I have no doubt that it's fan made.

It's not fan made because it will be in a book:

More books with Rapunzel:

DisneyJedi · Post by **DisneyJedi** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:09 am

You know what really annoyed me about this film? Before this even came out, some people were bitching just because it wasn't being done the way it "should" have been; hand-drawn.

Dragonlion · Post by **Dragonlion** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:09 am

bruno_wbt wrote:

Pocahontas, what have they done you?!

DVDizzy Forum

Latest Movie Reviews

🎬 DVDizzy Top Stories️️

Tangled Discussion Part VI: Let the Drama continue...