REINIER wrote:by the way since when is barney the dinosaur (although be it in green hornet costume) a sidekick in a disney movie??????
Yeah, I'm asking the same question!!!
What kind of animal is that sidekick?
REINIER wrote:by the way since when is barney the dinosaur (although be it in green hornet costume) a sidekick in a disney movie??????
sorry didn't mean to offend anyone, I just think that the lack of a decent neck to support a head is always bugging me.Prudence wrote:She is not! She and her sisters are perfectly normal children! Each weighs less than Lilo, I can tell you that.REINIER wrote: As far as ariel goes, that's one fat child!
You can see in the sneak peek that Marina Del Ray wears costumes that seamlessly blend into her tail. She wears two different costumes and we see two different colored tails! This makes me think it is a dsiguise, or at least something she can change.caioloki wrote:something also really weird about marina, is the lack of a proper "trim" between her human body and her mertail. Do you guys see that? all the other merpeople have them.
Well, the sequels got better and better as they trained more and learned more and kept practicing, and they wanted to get better. Just the fact Andreas Deja agreed to help animate Bambi shows that they wanted it to be better than past sequels. I'm sure it's because Bambi is considered a big, more untouchable Disney classic, more than Cinderella, probably because Bambi came before it, it's older than Cinderella, and Cinderella got one crappy sequel. BUT in Cinderella 3 they actually made their best sequel, and Cinderella 3's backgrounds look just as good if not better than Bambi 2's! Or at least...from what I've seen. I have not watched all of Bambi 2.REINIER wrote:Why was Bambi 2 any different.
Even the background art was better than any sequel/prequel.
I'ts good to see that the backgrounds for this movie are decent enough!
She woulden't be filling anybody's shoes because marina is a character all her own, who later on in the story will probably turn out to be ursula.WickedElphie wrote:I really don't think Marina is Ursula in disguise. Sally Field is a well-known respected actress,a nd I doubt she'd be interested in being a replacement voice for Pat Carrol. My gut says that they used one of Ursula's early designs for the look, but that in-story she's not at all connected with her.
Plus, in the first movie Ursula couldn't disguise her voice uinless she had soemone else's to mask her own with.
As far as Jim Cummings (at lean many occasionst it sure sounds like him) as Triton goes, I'm guessing Ken Mars was unavailible for some reason, and Disney went with one of their go-to substitutes.
As always thanks for clearing that up disney dusterDisney Duster wrote:You can see in the sneak peek that Marina Del Ray wears costumes that seamlessly blend into her tail. She wears two different costumes and we see two different colored tails! This makes me think it is a dsiguise, or at least something she can change.caioloki wrote:something also really weird about marina, is the lack of a proper "trim" between her human body and her mertail. Do you guys see that? all the other merpeople have them.
But in the orginal movie, some mermaids didn't have the trim. They had the bodice, like Ursula, so their fish part went all the way up to their chest. This was only found on over weight mermaids, like a one-piece bathing suit.
And to answer what you said earlier, the creatures Ursula and Marina control are eels. Ursula had Moray eels, Marina has Electric eels. But I'm hoping Flotsam and Jetsam are somehow involved with the Electric eels.
Well, the sequels got better and better as they trained more and learned more and kept practicing, and they wanted to get better. Just the fact Andreas Deja agreed to help animate Bambi shows that they wanted it to be better than past sequels. I'm sure it's because Bambi is considered a big, more untouchable Disney classic, more than Cinderella, probably because Bambi came before it, it's older than Cinderella, and Cinderella got one crappy sequel. BUT in Cinderella 3 they actually made their best sequel, and Cinderella 3's backgrounds look just as good if not better than Bambi 2's! Or at least...from what I've seen. I have not watched all of Bambi 2.REINIER wrote:Why was Bambi 2 any different.
Even the background art was better than any sequel/prequel.
I'ts good to see that the backgrounds for this movie are decent enough!