Famous Movies You've Never Seen

Discussion of non-Disney entertainment.
Lazario

Post by Lazario »

Goliath wrote:
Lazario wrote:Hey- we're talking about you here. Don't forget. You already blackened yourself. It's too late to try and switch this around on me. You had to make that crack about horror movies and Lady Gaga. You made this personal.
Aha! THERE it is! NOW we've finally coming to the point! I criticised something you LIKE. Not you, yourself. I didn't attack YOU. I didn't offend you as a person. I merely criticised something you like.
You did insinuate I was stupid - I proved it. I linked you to the post. You did attack me.

But you know what- I don't care anymore.

Try to deny it now, I don't care. I'm not reporting you. I don't care about you anymore, or anything related to you at all. I tried to get somethng through to you. Which is now glaringly obvious was always an utterly fruitless venture. I'm tired to "trying" to talk to you.

Duster was wrong about you. I'm the cynic. You're just dead inside.

Have fun being smarter than me, I'm sure it comes in handy.

Goliath wrote:behave like a nutjob, you are not delusional, but also a madman. And I pity you for it. Because you have made a fool out of yourself.
Look into a mirror.
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

Please stop with the personal attacks. Though they may have started out of this discussion, they don't belong here or anywhere on the forum. Either put this feud to rest or this otherwise interesting thread gets closed. Thanks.
"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
User avatar
jpanimation
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1841
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:00 am

Post by jpanimation »

BelleGirl wrote:A famous movie I've never seen and do not want to see is A Clockwork Orange. I have a feeling I will not be able to stand the violence in this movie. I'm not really a sissy wheb it comes to watching violence (I've sat through Braveheart) but there are limits. This is also the reason why I've avoided watching The Passion of the Christ so far, though movies about Jesus always interest me.

Maybe UD-rs will argue that ACO is a very good story, probably they are right. As an alternative, I can read the book instead.
I actually found it [A Clockwork Orange] to be one of Kubrick's weaker efforts, along with 2001: A Space Odyssey, both of which seem to have garnered legendary statues among movie aficionados. It's unfortunate that they overshadow his earlier-more grounded work (The Killing, Paths of Glory) that, IMO, are superior to the ones that everyone knows of.

My main reason for watching A Clockwork Orange was to see where the parody at the beginning of Conker's Bad Fur Day came from, and I was disappointed to say the least. I never read A Clockwork Orange but I have a feeling it's better then the movie. The movie, to me, was just goofy. The violence is actually really tame, but everything in the movie is overdramatic and blown up. Kubrick's vision of the future goes from being realistic, as it was in 2001, to ridiculous. Some how it becomes cool to wear a diaper over your close with a bowler hat (soo...gangsta?). I'm just not so sure what is so ultra about the violence of the future (I see worse gang violence on the news). Still, it's a nice story that I just don't think was told very well.
Image
User avatar
UmbrellaFish
Signature Collection
Posts: 5717
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:09 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him)

Post by UmbrellaFish »

It's been roughly a year since I last posted and I've since seen a whopping 17 of the films I listed. :oops:

Here's a short retrospect (primarily because I saw most of these films further back than my memory is willing to oblige):

A Streetcar Named Desire- I thoroughly enjoyed this.
Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street- Not very good. Not trash by any means, but not very good. I thought going in that I'd love Bonham-Carter and hate Depp, but it turned out to be the opposite. My only critique of Depp is he looked too good for a father of a teenage daughter shipped to exile in Australia, ultimately escaping, and going mad for revenge in the process. But he's got good genes.
Ed Wood- Excellent movie. Probably the best I've seen of Burton.
Wait Until Dark- Very good.
Slumdog Millionaire- Not as good as the hype led you to believe.
Camelot- Overproduced, and I'm sorry, but Vanessa Redgrave can't sing. Richard Harris was surprisingly good, though.
Clue- Good fun!
All About Eve- Bitchy fun!
Oklahoma- Better than I thought it would be, but I probably wasn't giving enough credit to the source material.
South Pacific- Those damn color filters...
Seven Brides for Seven Brothers- Good. Not quite my cuppa tea, though.
The Nun's Story- Of her work that I've seen, this is the best performance I have ever seen Audrey Hepburn give. A very good film.
Rebecca- Fantastic suspense.
Romeo + Juliet- All I remember is the glitz.
Monty Python and Holy Grail- Yeah, sadly, I don't understand this sort of humor. As this movie showed me.
Requiem for a Dream- An incredible film. Just incredible. Probably the best on this list.
10- Much better than I had expected it to be. Funny, because when I read reviews for it, it said the film had been horribly dated. I wasn't even alive in the '70s and I thought it was pretty fresh. And... I have a new found appreciation for Ravel.

Perhaps if this thread is revived past my post I might refurbish my list of "famous" films I haven't seen.
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

UmbrellaFish wrote:Monty Python and Holy Grail- Yeah, sadly, I don't understand this sort of humor. As this movie showed me.
I didn't like it either, but I LOVED Monty Python's Life of Brian. Much better: better story and hilarious jokes. It's a great satirical story, whereas Holy Grail was just silly nonsense.
User avatar
Scarred4life
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1410
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 12:18 pm

Post by Scarred4life »

UmbrellaFish wrote:Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street- Not very good. Not trash by any means, but not very good.
Really? I just saw it last week and I love it! What didn't you like about it?
User avatar
UmbrellaFish
Signature Collection
Posts: 5717
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:09 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him)

Post by UmbrellaFish »

Scarred4life wrote: Really? I just saw it last week and I love it! What didn't you like about it?
It's been so long since I've seen it, I can only describe my problems vaguely. I remember HBC didn't seem up to snuff in this role (a shame, because it should have been a knock out of the park for her) and Burton's stylistic choices seemed to take over the film. But mostly I remember that I just didn't like it.

It's not a fair comparison, because one is a filmed stage musical and the other a legitimate movie, but I much preferred the taped version of the 1980s production with Angela Lansbury and George Hearn. It's more organic and, I feel, more entertaining.
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

^It was a little drawn out for me, but I liked it.

Now for me, copious amounts of Kubrick, Speilberg, and Eastwood movies and I'm also missing all of Hitchcock.

inb4getout
Image
User avatar
BelleGirl
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1174
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:36 am
Location: The Netherlands, The Hague

Post by BelleGirl »

Goliath wrote:
UmbrellaFish wrote:Monty Python and Holy Grail- Yeah, sadly, I don't understand this sort of humor. As this movie showed me.
I didn't like it either, but I LOVED Monty Python's Life of Brian. Much better: better story and hilarious jokes. It's a great satirical story, whereas Holy Grail was just silly nonsense.

But isn't silly nonsens exactly what Monty Python is mainly about? Or at least absurdism: a race for loonies, ministry of silly walks, gangs of old ladies terrorising the neighbourhood, bicycle repair man (in contrast to the 'common' superman) etc. Not everybody's kind of humour, I know.

I forgot to mention that I saw the Woody Allen classic Annie Hall this weekend. I can imagine this isn't everybody's kind of humour either, but I liked it.
Image

See my growing collection of Disney movie-banners at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/78256383@N ... 651337290/
User avatar
disneyboy20022
Signature Collection
Posts: 6868
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:17 pm

Post by disneyboy20022 »

Monty Python

Gone with the Wind

Casablanca

Citizen Kane

Purple Rain

Kindergarten Cop (I may have seen in when I was 5 but I don't remember it very well - I'll have to pick up a copy at some point)

National Lampoon - any of the movies

Stripes

Friday the 13th

Nightmare on Elm Street

Juno

Splash

Saving Private Ryan

Footloose (the original - and i havn't seen the remake....)

Arthur (didn't see the remake nor did I see the original)

The Patriot

300

Gladiator

Blade ( including the sequels I didn't see)

Howard the Duck

Top Gun

all of the Fast and the Furious Movies

all of the Die Hard Movies

The 3 Bourne Movies

Any of the James Bond movies - I've seen trailers but that's about it

Indiana Jones 2 and 3

The Sound of Music

The King and I (live action)

Chitty Chitty Bang Bang

any movies containing Hannibal Lector (Silence of the Lambs etc)

The Last Exorcism ( any of them)

My Neighbor Totoro

Black Swan

the 3 Swan Princess movies (animated)

Hurt Locker

Marley and Me

Star Trek (I have only seen the JJ Abrams one)

Planet of the Apes (though I did see that one from 2001)

Tim Burton's Sleepy Hollow

Tim Burton's Sweeney Todd

Moulin Rouge

The Shining

Dirty Dancing

Inception

Rocky Horror Picture Show

Any of the Rocky Movies with Sylvester Stallone

Any of the Rambo Movies



and i'm sure there are more that I can't think of at the moment
Want to Hear How I met Roy E. Disney in 2003? Click the link Below

http://fromscreentotheme.com/ThursdayTr ... isney.aspx
User avatar
JiminyCrick91
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3930
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: ont. canada
Contact:

Post by JiminyCrick91 »

disneyboy20022 wrote:Monty Python

National Lampoon - any of the movies

Indiana Jones 2 and 3
1. They were a comedy troupe that (counting sketch films) did FIVE films if I recall correctly.

2. National Lampoon means nothing today as they don't REALLY make stuff. Often the name holders of NL buy up movies or scripts already finished and slap the name on it (with over 70 titles all together if wiki is correct in this matter). NL was a comedy mag back in the day and, for the most part, meant quality but in the late 90's they went kaput and the name has been nothing ever since. The films during the real period vary in style, Animal House is not like the Vacation series etc but you should see both AH and the Vaca series ASAP.

3. Temple of Doom is actually a prequel so hence why when the videos were re released with the Young Indiana Jones, the TV Show was made chapters 1-22, Temple was 23, Raiders was 24, and LC was 25.

-Skyler
Image
dvdjunkie
Signature Collection
Posts: 5613
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:05 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Post by dvdjunkie »

Disneyboy -

Why haven't you seen any of those film? Have you been living under a rock or are so stuck on Disney that you won't watch any movie that doesn't have a Disney logo?

There is no remake of "Footloose", only the one film with Kevin Bacon and Christopher Penn and John Lithgow.

The only National Lampoon movies worth seeing are the "Vacation" movies and "Animal House".

"Silence of the Lambs" is really the only Hannibal Lector movie that needs to be seen. The sequels and pre-quels are all over-rated.

Monthy Python's "Life of Brian", "Meaning of Life", and "And Now For Something Completely Different" should be at the top of the list, and the rest can follow behind these three brilliantly funny movies.

What have you been watching that you haven't even watched any of these movies on HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, or any of the other premium channels out there? You definitely need to get out more or look at something on television other than Disney Channel.
The only way to watch movies - Original Aspect Ratio!!!!
I LOVE my Blu-Ray Disc Player!
TheSequelOfDisney
Signature Collection
Posts: 5263
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Ohio, United States of America

Post by TheSequelOfDisney »

dvdjunkie wrote:There is no remake of "Footloose", only the one film with Kevin Bacon and Christopher Penn and John Lithgow.
Yes there is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Footloose_%282011_film%29. It just hasn't been released yet.
The Divulgations of One Desmond Leica: http://desmondleica.wordpress.com/
PixarFan2006
Signature Collection
Posts: 6166
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:44 am
Location: Michigan

Post by PixarFan2006 »

* = Some of these movies I blind bought recently, but I have not watched yet.

Apollo 13
any James Bond film
any Pink Panther Film
*The Big Lebowski
*The Blues Brothers
Casablanca
Citizen Kane
Dr. Strangelove
The Godfather Films
Gone With the Wind
Goodfellas
*The Matrix
*Monty Python's Meaning of Life
*National Lampoon's Animal House
Rambo films
Rocky II, III, V, Balboa
Saving Private Ryan
Schindler's List
Vertigo
dvdjunkie
Signature Collection
Posts: 5613
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:05 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Post by dvdjunkie »

TheSequelofDisney wrote:
It just hasn't been released yet.
This is about the tepid remake of "Footloose".

Okay then no one has seen the remake if it hasn't been released. And you all know how I feel about remakes. For the most part they don't stand up to the original. So I would again suggest to Disney Boy that he just see the original and forget about the remake.

And anyone who thinks that "Arthur" with Russell Brand is a good movie, wouldn't know a good movie if it jumped up and bit them on the arse.

Read Luke's review of the Blu-ray. He says it all. See the original with the original Arthur, Dudley Moore!!!!

Remakes are the most dreaded of all the movies I see coming on the horizon. They all, for the most part, suck.
The only way to watch movies - Original Aspect Ratio!!!!
I LOVE my Blu-Ray Disc Player!
User avatar
JiminyCrick91
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3930
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: ont. canada
Contact:

Post by JiminyCrick91 »

dvdjunkie wrote: And anyone who thinks that "Arthur" with Russell Brand is a good movie, wouldn't know a good movie if it jumped up and bit them on the arse.

Read Luke's review of the Blu-ray. He says it all. See the original with the original Arthur, Dudley Moore!!!!

Remakes are the most dreaded of all the movies I see coming on the horizon. They all, for the most part, suck.
I love the '81 Arthur and still would like to see the remake. You don't have to get hostel so often about something you don't like. We all have differing tastes.

As for remakes:

The Wizard of Oz (1939)
The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956),
The Ten Commandments (1956)!!!
An Affair to Remember (1957),
The Fly (1986),
Father of the Bride (1991)
The Birdcage (1996),
The Departed (2006),
3:10 to Yuma (2007),
True Grit (2010),
Hairspray (and other movies turned musicals turned movies)

The above are all great remakes. I know you said for the most part but the failing of a remake is not on the practice it's self but on the skewed vision or lack of vision of some of the people working today who try to make a good film but just were not the right choice for the project.

-Skyler
Image
User avatar
David S.
Special Edition
Posts: 773
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:23 pm

Post by David S. »

There are quite a few famous movies I haven't seen, because I admitedly have fairly limited taste. While I DON'T limit myself to just Disney, there are many genres I know from experience that I simply don't care for. Since I hate the experience of watching movies and not liking them, I am pretty selective about what I watch, and even more selective about what I buy. I generally stick with G and PG-rated (and the occasional PG-13) "family films" that fall within the genres of Animation, Fantasy, Animal Films, Musicals, and period/literary films, depending on the story.

I prefer escapism over "realism", and Happy Endings are pretty much mandatory for my tastes, as I feel things very deeply when I watch movies, as if they are real. But this makes the happier parts more happy! I want to be EURPHORICALLY UPLIFTED by movies. I don't like sad, "dark" and "edgy".

Also, I don't care for excessive violence, gore, crudeness, explicitness, or nudity, so that pretty much leaves out most PG 13 and R movies, as most of those have one or more of these elements. Not for any religious reasons, this is just my taste! It's more about seeking out things that enhance my inner child. If I accidentally hear about a shooting/murder in real life, I want to always be deeply saddened by it, and not be cold and hardened to these things by seeing so much of it in movies. My general rule of thumb is, if I wouldn't take a child to see it, I don't care to see it!

Anyway, I seem to have a pattern of not seeing some of the highest-grossing films of all time, such as:

Titanic - I already know from history that this will have a VERY sad and unhappy ending, so with my tastes, why invest the time in this only to end up feeling sad and depressed by it?

The Dark Knight - I didn't care for the first Nolan reboot. I liked the Burton ones better (especially the last two more campy ones directed by Joel Schumacher ). And yet I didn't care for any of those NEARLY as much as the camp fun of the Adam West Batman tv series and film. With the reports of this one being the darkest, most violent Batman yet, it was so easy for me to skip this. When I want a Batman fix, I'd rather go with THIS:

<iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4mdKrNT29kE" frameborder="0"></iframe>

<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9d8srLbNih0" frameborder="0"></iframe>

<iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RLZQ3OLEJWE" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 and 2 - Potter has simply gotten too DARK for my taste. I absolutely LOVED the first 3 Potter films, where we get to enjoy the sense of wonder and charm of Harry's introduction into the world of magic, and things are solved neatly and with no tragic deaths. (other than Harry's parents, but like fairy tales, these occur BEFORE the start of the story). And how awesome was that "time turner" ending in #3, where Buckbeak is saved and Sirius is set free! What a PERFECT, UPLIFTING ending when Harry flies off on Buckbeak. That moment was the peak of my Potter interest. They seemed magical and safe, and I looked forward to the 4th with great anticipation (I've never read the books, so I didn't know what was coming).

Sadly, there would not be any triumphant moments like that perfect ending of 3 in the next three films. Ever since that idiot Voldemort (I said his name!) appears in the 4th film, they have taken a turn away from what I loved about the first three - starting with the tragic death of Cedric which ENDS the fourth film and sends audiences out of theatres depressed and on a sad note. No uplifting Happy Ending in 4, 5, or 6, and Rowling seems intent on killing off as many beloved, innocent, good characters as possible. I read enough spoilers about 7-1 to know I would NOT have liked it, as even MORE beloved good characters die in the last book than in 4, 5, and 6 combined (where's the time turner now?)

So, as I slowly saw EVERYTHING I loved about the first 3 films disappear in the next 3, I've called it a day and prefer to remember Potter for the first three films, which, again, I LOVED. In hindsight, I should have stopped watching after my disappointment with the unhappy ending in 4, but I gave 5 and 6 a blind shot as well, (without investigating any spoilers) and experienced the same disapointing, diminishing returns that I did with #4. The bottom line is, the series started with a charming and innocent sense of wonder at this magical world, sprinkled with fun little scenes of life at Hogwarts, and it turned into something MUCH MUCH darker and less "family-friendly", arguably significantly darker than the original Star Wars trilogy and even Lord of the Rings.

Others' mileage may very. I am not used to watching PG-13 movies (and definitely not Rs), so the level of violence, darkness, sadness, and tragedy in 4, 5, and 6 was quite shocking and unenjoyable for me! Note that I am NOT blaming the filmmakers as I know that they are simply being faithful to the books.

Avatar - There isn't really any specific reason why I haven't seen this. I was borderline about whether the story appealed to me or not, and haven't gotten around to deciding whether I want to watch it when it comes on basic cable TV.

These are but a few examples of well-known contemporary blockbusters that I haven't seen. My explanations are not meant to start a debate or offend anyone who enjoys these movies!
Last edited by David S. on Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Feed the birds, tuppence a bag"- Mary Poppins
"How high does the sycamore grow? If you cut it down, then you'll never know"- Pocahontas
"I do not make films primarily for children. I make them for the child in all of us, whether he be six or sixty. Call the child innocence." - Walt Disney
User avatar
singerguy04
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:40 pm
Location: The Land of Lincoln

Post by singerguy04 »

what an interesting thread that I've never read before. It's funny to me because some friends and I have been talking about making lists for each other like this and making us watch the films.

Recently, I switched to a night position (9pm-7:30am) at where I work, and my boss doesn't mind that I bring my laptop and listen to movies or music while I'm working, so I'm starting to catch up with movies that have been on my list.

Casablanca
All Rocky Films
All Terminator Films
All Preditor Films
All Alien Films
All Godfather Films
The Breakfast Club
3:10 to Yuma
Most of the James Bond Films (I've seen both Daniel Craig, and Octopussy)
The Jerk
Saving Private Ryan
The Green Mile
Citizen Kane
Hurt Locker
Breakfast at Tiffany's
The Shawshank Redemption
Amelie
A Streetcar Named Desire


and that's all I can think of right now...
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

BelleGirl wrote:But isn't silly nonsens exactly what Monty Python is mainly about? Or at least absurdism: [...] Not everybody's kind of humour, I know.
Oh yes, absolutely. I think I worded it wrong. I absolutely LOVE Monty Python; I just don't like The Holy Grail. But Life of Brian is, in my opinion, one of the best films ever made.
disneyboy20022 wrote:Monty Python's Life of Brian
Casablanca
Citizen Kane
Die Hard 1 & 3
(Silence of the Lambs)
Black Swan
The Shining
Just watch these. All the other titles on your list are big-time crap. Would be a waste of time to watch them.
dvdjunkie wrote:Disneyboy - Why haven't you seen any of those film? Have you been living under a rock or are so stuck on Disney that you won't watch any movie that doesn't have a Disney logo?
You act like he listed the best of the best in all of cinematic history. Maybe he has been watching Hitchcock, Ford, Hawks, Wilder, Cuckor, Capra, Coppola, Leone etc.?
dvdjunkie wrote:And anyone who thinks that "Arthur" with Russell Brand is a good movie, wouldn't know a good movie if it jumped up and bit them on the arse.
You're one to talk! :lol:
JiminyCrick91 wrote:The Departed (2006),

The above are all great remakes.
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree here. Have you seen the original movie, Infernal Affairs (2002)? That was a brilliant tale about two moles (one in the mafia, one in the police force), who both struggle with their respective roles. They want to remain loyal to their own people, but once infiltrated in 'the other side', they have trouble with betraying them too. Neither character is fully black or white, they're both in a 'grey' kind of zone. Scorsese's remake turned this complex tale into a bland Hollywoodization, with a clear "good guy" and "bad guy", just so the audience wouldn't get confused. He made no attempt to add more than one layer to any of the characters; he turned them into stock characters. Too bad the Academy gave him an Oscar just out of pity.
User avatar
JiminyCrick91
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3930
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: ont. canada
Contact:

Post by JiminyCrick91 »

Goliath wrote:
JiminyCrick91 wrote:The Departed (2006),

The above are all great remakes.
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree here. Have you seen the original movie, Infernal Affairs (2002)? That was a brilliant tale about two moles (one in the mafia, one in the police force), who both struggle with their respective roles. They want to remain loyal to their own people, but once infiltrated in 'the other side', they have trouble with betraying them too. Neither character is fully black or white, they're both in a 'grey' kind of zone. Scorsese's remake turned this complex tale into a bland Hollywoodization, with a clear "good guy" and "bad guy", just so the audience wouldn't get confused. He made no attempt to add more than one layer to any of the characters; he turned them into stock characters. Too bad the Academy gave him an Oscar just out of pity.
Ok, that's fine. Agree to disagree. :) As I said it is all about opinion after all and many people did enjoy the remake thus why I put it on here. To be honest I'd have put a few more on that list if it were just remakes I liked but I thought a couple may have weakened my point with Bill. :P

-Skyler
Image
Post Reply