What is your religious faith?

Any topic that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What's your religious faith?

Roman Catholic
18
27%
Protestant
19
29%
Greek Orthodox
2
3%
Judaism
1
2%
Islam
1
2%
Hindu
1
2%
Sikh
0
No votes
Buddhism
2
3%
Animist
0
No votes
Other
22
33%
 
Total votes: 66

User avatar
Jules
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4624
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Malta, Europe
Contact:

Post by Jules »

Wonderlicious wrote: Oh, and did you go up the TV tower? :shifty:
Wow! You've seen quite lot! :) I didn't see as much because I was taking part in a youth experience, so sightseeing was not the priority. I did not go up the TV tower, but was right underneath it when we went to Alexanderplatz.

Something I noticed was that all the trams and trains had letters and graffiti scratched on the glass panes of their windows. This was my first time on such vehicles.

PS: Since this totally off topic, I suggest we continue discussing it here.
Lars Vermundsberget
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Lars Vermundsberget »

Timon/Pumbaa fan wrote:I guess one pollitcal party have never driven cars in there lives. :roll:
Please - what One American Political Party says to Other American Political Party and your opinion about the two is hardly enough here. The climate debate is more complicated, not always "black and white" and involves the whole world.
User avatar
Fflewduur
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:14 am
Location: Waiting For Somebody

Post by Fflewduur »

Thanks, Lars. True dat.

By the way, Democrats can be Christian, too (no matter what Ann Coulter says). And Christians can believe in climate change caused by humanity, so let's not pretend we can accomplish anything by making grand monolithic generalizations---especially stupid ones---shall we? I for one am glad that more clergy are taking the approach that we have done a poor job with our stewardship of this planet. Whatever you believe about global warming, I find it difficult to believe the Creator can look without disapproval upon what we've done with the Earth.

Just a little information on some religious leaders and global warming can be found <a href="http://www.nccecojustice.org/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/08/natio ... w">here</a>, <a href="http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:WLK ... i">here</a>, <a href="http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:SS1 ... i">here</a>, <a href="http://www.forestethics.org/article.php ... 5">here</a>, <a href="http://www.ecpi.com/~tximpact/religious ... m">here</a>...
Lars Vermundsberget
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Lars Vermundsberget »

One interesting approach I read about recently:

Preserving or "taking care of" the environment is in one way the most conservative standpoint there is.
User avatar
Fflewduur
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:14 am
Location: Waiting For Somebody

Post by Fflewduur »

Lars Vermundsberget wrote:One interesting approach I read about recently:

Preserving or "taking care of" the environment is in one way the most conservative standpoint there is.
Wow! You mean "conservation" and "conservative" have the same root?!? :o
Lars Vermundsberget
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Lars Vermundsberget »

Fflewduur wrote:
Lars Vermundsberget wrote:One interesting approach I read about recently:

Preserving or "taking care of" the environment is in one way the most conservative standpoint there is.
Wow! You mean "conservation" and "conservative" have the same root?!? :o
Some groundbreaking insight, don't you think...? 8)
User avatar
MichaeLeah
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: Tampa, FL

Post by MichaeLeah »

I am going to throw out a few comments that will put us back on track...maybe. I don't think that matters of religion and faith should be accepted blindly or just believed without any evidence. I even commend those who think and won't just gobble up religion or Christianity without using our brain. I will even go so far as so say that many of the attacks on Christiainty in this thread or quite legitimate.

I have also observed that some of the debate in this thread has pertained to perepheral issues while the debators have held opposite fundamental positions. The consequence of such a discussion is each person looks at each other as crazy because they are coming from such radical positions.

I don't mean to be Captain Obvious but I want to describe the logical progression of thought that could potentially rationally lead a person to Christianity (or away from it). I think Christiainity can be arrived at rationally and it doesn't just have to be a belief in some wild idea. So here is the progession:

1) Belief in the existence of God.

The existence of God can not be proven empirically. Neither can atheism (the non-existence of something cannot be proven--just think of atoms, we didn't previously know they exist--but they did). I don't think that conclusion must force us into agnosticism. Although the existence of God cannot be proven, there is evidence for the existence of God. Based on the evidence, a person can use rationalism to determine there is a God. Now, this may come as a surprise to many, but there are many people who are dedicated to studying and writing about the evidence of God. Creationism (which isn't a prerequisite for belief in God) isn't just a religious belief. The is a place called the Creation Research Institute which is home to many outstanding physists, biologists, archeologists, etc. who are dedicated to doing empirical research. Notice they aren't preachers, they are scientists, real scientists with real degrees from secular schools. They are convinced of the existence of God via their research. There are many books available that present evidence for the existence of God from a scientific perspective. They deal with weaknesses in the theory of evolution and they deal with strengths in the theory of creation. Sometimes the books are pretty easy to read and sometimes it is quite heavy (at least for me). The CRI even has a big museum in San Diago complete with dinosaur fossils.

There are also people who argue for the existence of God philosophically and through rationalism. This is the subject of many books by C.S. Lewis. This is where issues are raised like "If there is a God, why do evil things happen in the world?" This is a good question, maybe I will talk about it on a future thread.

2) If there is a God, has he communicated with man? And if he has, how so? (The question of Jesus.)

Historical sources outside of the Bible have verified the existence of Jesus. The question is, "What is the significance of Jesus?" or "What documents are available that tell us about Jesus?" It is at this point that we deal with who Jesus was and if the Bible (or New Testament in particular) is reliable. There is a great deal or research that has also been done in this area. There are documents from outside the Bible that talk about Jesus. There has also been research that has been done to try to determine if the New Testament is authentic or if it was altered. There are some great books you can read on this subject.

3) What are the practical implications based on the answers to the first two statements. In other words, if the above is true (or false) how should it impact my behavior.

This is the peripheral issue I am talking about. You must agree on the first two statements to agree on the third statement (I know this statement could use some qualification).

I understand reservation in believing some of the ideas listed above. Everybody is always trying to sell something and that is sometimes what Christianity looks like. I understand the "church" has done many stupid things in the name of "religion." But just because you get a lousy government leader, it doesn't mean democracy doesn't work. And just because some traditionally animated films flopped and weren't so good doesn't mean tradition animation is no good anymore.

I think it is admirable that many people here won't just buy into Christianity. I appreciate people who are "thinkers." I don't mean to be Captain Obvious, but those who like to study should consider this progession of logic. If you want to check out Christianity and see whether it is legitimate or not, look into some of these things. I can refer you to some books if you would like.

If I didn't think Christiainity was a rational way to look at reality, I would drop it. I like to think critically too, and I won't believe something unless I have good cause to believe it.
Last edited by MichaeLeah on Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Finchx0rz
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: USA

Post by Finchx0rz »

*points at MichaeLeah* What he said.
<a href="http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/" target="_blank">Got a question? Ask Google first.</a>
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

Why does God allow bad things to happen?

This question basically is the decider in my opinion that there is no God. Nobody, but nobody has ever convinced me of a valid reason.

I'm sorry, Disney Duster - I'm not mocking your or your belief - but your example of Job basically makes it seem like God was acting like Big Brother in the Big Brother house towards Job. It's OK to be humilated/abused because at the end of it you'll win lots of money/go to Heaven. It's the sort of behaviour I would associate with ancient Greek or Roman gods, not the God, who supposedly loves us all.

It's ironic, but nobody in the church who I have heard who have addressed the issue of God and suffering has come remotely close to convincing me. But the TV series Joan of Arcadia did make some pretty good points and arguments which maybe made be thing twice for a while.

Creationism

I know that there are different "levels" of creationism, from the "God made the Earth in 7 days" thought to "Inteligent Design" to physicians charting and noting numerous "mathamatical coincidences" in the laws of physics.

But again, I cannot accept the existance of an all-powerful creator, becasue of the logical flaw that somebody would have to create the creator. If all these wonderful creatures and mathamatical coincidences cannot happen by chance, then how can an all-powerful creator happen by chance? So I'll happily put everything down to coincidence.

The world is a wonderful place, and no doubt the universe when we explore it will be even more amazing. We have such beautiful creations as orchids, butterfies, cute white kittens... I can understand why people may think a divine hand helped in their creation. Their beauty is outstanding - even the single eye on a single butterfly is a breathtakingly wonderful creation. But the world also includes untold parasites - ticks that lay their eggs in an eyeball, tapeworms that feed and drain the nurishment from their hosts, wasps that lay their larva inside that of other insects, even parasites that can change their host's behaviour with chemicals then leave them to die in agony while providing food for the parasite or its young... The world also has an endless supply of mutating viri and diseases, some of which inflict terrible symptoms and pain on anyone infected... Why would a creator design and make these?
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
Lars Vermundsberget
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Lars Vermundsberget »

MichaeLeah, I think most of that makes a lot of sense. Although I won't hit anyone on the head with a specific standpoint, I guess it can be argued that it isn't necessarily crazy to believe in the existence of God. I prefer this philosophical approach.

As for Christianity or any other religion being "right", I think that's a lot more about history and culture, and to some extent some of us take part in different cultures.

What I most firmly "believe" in, and I guess it's really quite obvious, is that we're all basically "the same", even if people believe (in) different things - "God" being "this" or "that" or nothing at all. People hitting each other on the head for such reasons seems pretty stupid in that light - in my opinion.

That pretty much covers my views on religion and the existence of God in principle. However, what some people are ready to "deny" or "grant" other people (or themselves) based on religious beliefs is a different "can of worms", and sometimes problematic to say the least.
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14032
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

The Greatest Debate Ever Debated

Post by Disney Duster »

2099net wrote:I'm sorry, Disney Duster - I'm not mocking your or your belief - but your example of Job basically makes it seem like God was acting like Big Brother in the Big Brother house towards Job. It's OK to be humilated/abused because at the end of it you'll win lots of money/go to Heaven. It's the sort of behaviour I would associate with ancient Greek or Roman gods, not the God, who supposedly loves us all.
Thanks for addressing me again. I see all of your points, and agree that those a very good analogies. But it makes sense to me that evil things should exist. You love your friends even though they do bad things sometimes, right? They do nice things and bad things. Maybe there are some who don't bother you at all, but no one is perfect. Yet we say God is supposed to be perfect... Well, I meant God wants us to love him even when things don't go our way. Of course, sometimes things go incredibly horribly...and that has me thinking. Maybe God gave us the free will to help people who are suffering from such natural horrors, but we don't do anything, and that's why things are so bad. God wants us to help but we don't.

And just for the record, I believe in God but do not fully believe in any one religion. I'm currently confused and unsure of things, like many young people.
Image
User avatar
Jules
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4624
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Malta, Europe
Contact:

Re: The Greatest Debate Ever Debated

Post by Jules »

Disney Duster wrote:And just for the record, I believe in God but do not fully believe in any one religion. I'm currently confused and unsure of things, like many young people.
You know...I'm a Roman Catholic and I don't like getting doubts about my religion. However, since starting this thread and reading the replies, I seem to be starting to crumble. Am I going to start abandoning my religion aswell for my own theories? The thing is, deep down, I think I aswell feel the Christian Church (that moulds our religion) is far from perfect. As soon as I think this, I try to find an excuse for its shortcomings by saying that after all it's run by humans, and humans make mistakes.

But then, in the Bible, doesn't Jesus say that the Church will always be guided by the Holy Spirit and that the forces of evil will never conquer it?

PS: As to what people have been saying on this thread about things in the Bible being untrue...this is what I have been taught: When the human writers of the Bible wrote their particular books, they were illuminated by God. However, God didn't tell them what to write word for word. He left them in the liberty to write in their own style of writing, regardless of era and culture. For example, the Bible says that Moses (with God's power) split the Red Sea, and that God gave the Egyptian chariots a hard time to get across with the mud.

As rational beings, we all should know that this didn't happen! (Not that God couldn't split the sea in two if he wanted too) But when this book was written, the writer used his imagination and wrote the proceedings in the literary form of a SAGA, wherein the reader is supposed to feel excited and emotional about the proceedings. In reality, Moses did not divide the Red Sea. Studies reveal that in the area there is a shallow sea with lots of mud and bamboo and cane sticks. THIS IS WHAT MOST PROBABLY REALLY HAPPENED! Moses must have crossed this shallow sea with the Jews. And then we can also see why in the Bible it says that the Egyptians were slowed down: Because it would be hard to ride chariots through bamboo and canes!

Understand? In the Bible, you shouldn't take everything literally. You have to read in between the lines.
User avatar
slave2moonlight
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4427
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: TX
Contact:

Post by slave2moonlight »

Christian, Non-Denominational.

I find that a lot of the problems people have with Christianity, both as Christians or outside of it, tend to have more to do with the denominational beliefs than they realize.

I don't want to get too involved in this thread, because these topics usually lead to flaming and stuff. I'll just give my viewpoints on a couple of things I saw in a very quick scan of previous posts.

How can I believe that God created us all when there's that inevitable God paradox of, "Who created Him?" Well, that's kind of an unavoidable paradox. I mean, if we happened by chance in the universe, where did the universe come from? What was here before that? Where does anything come from? You always have that question of where something came from. For me, I'm just concerned with where Earth and the people on it came from, and I have to believe in God because I believe the designs here are too detailed for things not to have been set up by someone else. Only one planet in the right distance from the sun, only one species devoloping to the level we are at. Still no DEFINITE signs or contact from any alien life-forms, etc... I think of how complex everything is, and there's just too much design involved. I guess, being an artist, I can't help but know that splashing paint on a canvas isn't going to, purely by chance, make a beautiful, detailed picture. Not ever. Modern artists might argue that, but even if you vauely see something in a splash of paint, it won't be like a painting someone took the trouble to put great time and detail into.

How can a loving God exist and allow bad things to happen? This is one of the easiest ones, yet I rarely hear it explained to my satisfaction. I don't believe God physically interferes in our lives. Now, I'm talking "physically" here. If he did, we wouldn't have free will. That's all there is to it. I truly believe it is our souls that God is concerned with. If we have a car accident or decide to go on a shooting spree, it's our own fault. If we aren't allowed to make our own mistakes and learn our own lessons, we're just robots, which I do not believe is what God wants. We're here to learn to be better people. This world is like a big test. The Bible is like the book we have to study to pass the test, particularly with emulating Jesus Christ in mind. But that's just what I believe.
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

slave2moonlight wrote:How can a loving God exist and allow bad things to happen? This is one of the easiest ones, yet I rarely hear it explained to my satisfaction. I don't believe God physically interferes in our lives. Now, I'm talking "physically" here. If he did, we wouldn't have free will. That's all there is to it. I truly believe it is our souls that God is concerned with. If we have a car accident or decide to go on a shooting spree, it's our own fault. If we aren't allowed to make our own mistakes and learn our own lessons, we're just robots, which I do not believe is what God wants. We're here to learn to be better people. This world is like a big test. The Bible is like the book we have to study to pass the test, particularly with emulating Jesus Christ in mind. But that's just what I believe.
But is not my choice to be shot by somebody who has used his free will to go on a shooting spree, just like its not my choice to die in an earthquake or tsunami.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
User avatar
slave2moonlight
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4427
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: TX
Contact:

Post by slave2moonlight »

2099net wrote:
slave2moonlight wrote:How can a loving God exist and allow bad things to happen? This is one of the easiest ones, yet I rarely hear it explained to my satisfaction. I don't believe God physically interferes in our lives. Now, I'm talking "physically" here. If he did, we wouldn't have free will. That's all there is to it. I truly believe it is our souls that God is concerned with. If we have a car accident or decide to go on a shooting spree, it's our own fault. If we aren't allowed to make our own mistakes and learn our own lessons, we're just robots, which I do not believe is what God wants. We're here to learn to be better people. This world is like a big test. The Bible is like the book we have to study to pass the test, particularly with emulating Jesus Christ in mind. But that's just what I believe.
But is not my choice to be shot by somebody who has used his free will to go on a shooting spree, just like its not my choice to die in an earthquake or tsunami.
No, but it would be your choice to live in an earthquake or tsunami danger zone. The point is, if God interferes with anything you do, it interferes with your free will. That includes stopping you from going somewhere where you are about to get shot by some nut, or stopping the killer's bullet from hitting you (interfering with the killer's free will). We have to make our own choices, mistakes, whatever, and be prepared that we never know how much time we have on Earth because of it.
User avatar
Escapay
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 12562
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Somewhere in Time and Space
Contact:

Re: The Greatest Debate Ever Debated

Post by Escapay »

Disney Duster wrote:And just for the record, I believe in God but do not fully believe in any one religion. I'm currently confused and unsure of things, like many young people.
That's part of my religious beliefs as well. I follow one set religion, but I don't believe that any one religion is the be-all end-all religion. In theory, I believe that God created it all (you know, the universe, the planet, other ones besides ours that have life, etc.), but he came to people in different incarnations. Going back to my "other planets with life", did they have a Jesus Christ? Probably not. They had an incarnation of Jesus Christ, as all under the stars (and all the stars) are part of God, he created it. It'd be stupid to say that life on a planet 30 million light years away will be damned to hell because they don't follow Roman Catholicism. They follow whatever religion THEY built around God.

Now, going back to our world, all religions lead to a Higher Being. It's like an umbrella. God as "Higher Being", is the deity of nearly any religion you come across. Every religion has the belief that there is a higher being, and that there may (or may not) be a Judgement Day in which our souls either move on to another plane (Heaven or Hell), or our souls are revitalized, and come back again in another form (reincarnation). I have no problem with other religions because despite the fact that Roman Catholicism may be different in practice to Buddhism, or radically different in ideals to Wiccan, and even remarkably similar in Judaism, all religions follow a Higher Being, which I firmly believe is God.
Julian Carter wrote:For example, the Bible says that Moses (with God's power) split the Red Sea, and that God gave the Egyptian chariots a hard time to get across with the mud.

As rational beings, we all should know that this didn't happen! (Not that God couldn't split the sea in two if he wanted too)

(snip)

In reality, Moses did not divide the Red Sea. Studies reveal that in the area there is a shallow sea with lots of mud and bamboo and cane sticks. THIS IS WHAT MOST PROBABLY REALLY HAPPENED! Moses must have crossed this shallow sea with the Jews. And then we can also see why in the Bible it says that the Egyptians were slowed down: Because it would be hard to ride chariots through bamboo and canes!
Katherine Orrison goes into some detail about this during her commentary for The Ten Commandments. She basically explains (and I believe it), that God works through nature. That low tide allowed Moses and the Hebrews to cross the sea, while high tide didn't allow the Egyptians.

Another example she gave was the plagues, which Ramses talks about too, saying "all these things came on their own" (paraphrasing), and that no God (be it Egyptian or Hebrew) brought it upon them. I can't remember offhand what she talked about with that one, but it was another argument that God worked the plagues through nature (a volcano that spewed red mud near the mouth of the Nile caused the whole river to look like blood, for example).
slave2moonlight wrote:I mean, if we happened by chance in the universe, where did the universe come from? What was here before that? Where does anything come from? You always have that question of where something came from.
Consider this (I think it was Newton): For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

For every beginning, there is an end.

For every "live" universe...there was a dead one.

But who says one has to come after another. I don't remember what the theory is called, but there's a theory that for every idea, variation, change that can happen in the universe, there's a whole alternate universe where it does or doesn't happen. There's a universe where UD doesn't exist. There's a universe where it does. There's a universe where you wore a blue shirt today. There's one where you wore red instead. There's a universe where you just blinked your eyes a second ago, and one where you let it stay open another second. For every possibility, there's an alternate...reality/universe, where it does or doesn't happen.

So, keeping that in mind, just as there is a "live" universe right now, at the same time, though we're not in it, there's a "dead" universe right now. Just as our universe started with a Big Bang or Creationism (whichever you wish to believe), there's one that ended at the same time.
slave2moonlight wrote:Only one planet in the right distance from the sun, only one species devoloping to the level we are at. Still no DEFINITE signs or contact from any alien life-forms, etc... I think of how complex everything is, and there's just too much design involved.
Time is a big pain in the ass.

As far as our scientists have determined, the universe is around 4.2 billion years old.

We've been on Earth for the past 65 million years.

We've only been communicating verbally for the past 100,000 years.

We've only had a written language for the past 10,000 years.

We've only had what we consider modern technology for the past 150 years.

We've only had objects in space for the past 50 years.

And we've got a whole lot more years ahead of us.

For all we know, life forms from other planets have already gone through the rise and fall of their civilizations. 100 million years ago, there was probably a dominant empire in a star system not too far from us, but they died out 50 million years ago.

For all we know, 70 million years ago, life forms from another planet visited Earth, found no one to talk to, and turned around to head home.

For all we know, 30 million years ago, life forms from another planet visited Earth, found us in our primitive form, took a few pictures, made some t-shirts ("My friend visited a planet with primitive life forms and all I got was this lousy t-shirt!"), and left, figuring that they'll check again in another 30 million years.

For all we know, right now there may be a great galactic empire just observing other planets, waiting for us to advance our technology to a point that they feel our civilization has matured enough to be able to meet them. (Think the "Prime Directive" from Star Trek, where they don't interfere with a planet of inferior technology).

It's enough to make one's head explode.

Escapay
WIST #60:
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion? :p

WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

slave2moonlight wrote:
2099net wrote:
But is not my choice to be shot by somebody who has used his free will to go on a shooting spree, just like its not my choice to die in an earthquake or tsunami.
No, but it would be your choice to live in an earthquake or tsunami danger zone.
Well, most people don't CHOOSE to live in danger zones. They're poor, and have nowhere else to go. Take the Lebanon bombing for an example. Those leaflets dropped advicing people to leave weren't exactly helpful. How could people leave who had no cars? How could people leave when the roads were bombed and the airport destroyed? They were told to go North, but the north was still bombed? Where could they go - Into Syria? Aren't we constantly being told that is worse places to CHOOSE to live? For all its faults, Lebanon was a democracy.

Life isn't always simple black/white issues and choices. Variables get in the way.

The point is, if God interferes with anything you do, it interferes with your free will. That includes stopping you from going somewhere where you are about to get shot by some nut, or stopping the killer's bullet from hitting you (interfering with the killer's free will). We have to make our own choices, mistakes, whatever, and be prepared that we never know how much time we have on Earth because of it.
No, the point is, if you have two children fighting, or one of them suffering because of an accident, you either seperate them or you do your best to help them. You even do the same for your pets - even to fish fighting in an aquarium are seperated by the owner. Two fish.

And yet people constantly justify God, a being of total love, doing nothing when mankind suffers.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
User avatar
Jules
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4624
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Malta, Europe
Contact:

Post by Jules »

2099net wrote:And yet people constantly justify God, a being of total love, doing nothing when mankind suffers.
2099net, after this long debate, and all these posts, I feel I can understand why you have these theories of "Why does God allow awful things to happen?", and "I don't believe in God".

Now I believe in God, but if you're looking for logical answers to prove God's existence, then you will never be convinced...because there aren't any!

If you ask me these questions, this is what I would reply:

Q: If God created us, then who created God?
A: I don't know.

Q: Why doesn't God prevent certain awful things from happening?
A: I don't know.

And so on...

I can imagine you asking: "Then if you don't know, why do you believe?"

I may seem like a person who believes everything blindly (along with all the other Catholics), but I cannot allow such doubts to weaken my faith in God. I don not know his intentions. Maybe he let something happen for a special reason. And consider this: If I don't believe in God...what have I got to believe in? :?
User avatar
slave2moonlight
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4427
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: TX
Contact:

Post by slave2moonlight »

2099net wrote: Well, most people don't CHOOSE to live in danger zones. They're poor, and have nowhere else to go. Take the Lebanon bombing for an example. Those leaflets dropped advicing people to leave weren't exactly helpful. How could people leave who had no cars? How could people leave when the roads were bombed and the airport destroyed? They were told to go North, but the north was still bombed? Where could they go - Into Syria? Aren't we constantly being told that is worse places to CHOOSE to live? For all its faults, Lebanon was a democracy.

Life isn't always simple black/white issues and choices. Variables get in the way.
When your life is in danger because of your location, poor or not, I recommend you start walking, even if you die trying. People cross our borders everyday trying to get somewhere better. Of course, not everyone can walk, and not everyone lives right next door to a "better place." I realize that. However, it still goes back to free will. No, we don't choose to live where we are born, but somewhere along our lineage, someone did. Or maybe they were forced to, but it was someone's choice to force them. If some people get together and make a terrible government, that, too, is their decision. Yes, we suffer all over for various reasons, but it's always because we have free will and throughout history we haven't made 100% good choices with it, mainly because we refuse to love each other as brothers and sisters. We let ourselves be motivated by greed, anger, hatred, fear, lust, and all sorts of bad influences.

2099net wrote:No, the point is, if you have two children fighting, or one of them suffering because of an accident, you either seperate them or you do your best to help them. You even do the same for your pets - even to fish fighting in an aquarium are seperated by the owner. Two fish.

And yet people constantly justify God, a being of total love, doing nothing when mankind suffers.
I like to think God doesn't see us as pets. However, children, that's more like it. The thing is, separation doesn't solve anything. The hate/anger is still there. The best a parent can do is TEACH their children not to hate. This is what Jesus Christ taught, but it's up to people to follow those teachings, and many (including many who call themselves Christians) just plain don't want to. Forcing them to would take away their free will. But, again, separating them is not the answer. Mankind brings his suffering upon himself and each other, mostly by not loving each other (and I don't mean physically, we do plenty of that). We have to learn to live together and love each other like our Father told us. God did all a parent can do without controlling us like a mom or dad who doesn't let his kid leave the house or talk to people of the "wrong" race. As for as God fixing us every time we get in an accident, we'd all be going skydiving every day if we though we'd just get fixed if we had an accident. God gave us bodies that sense pain, our warning agent, and bodies that heal, up to a certain point, but we have to learn to be careful on our own. Not just of hurting ourselves, but others. Free will. Yes, pure accidents happen, but if God controlled the chance factor, it would still be a level of controlling free will. Basically, if God physically affects people in any manner, it's an affect on free will at some level. Do I believe God ever got involved with people on a physical level? Yes, before Jesus Christ. And why then and not now? I believe, to show people that it doesn't work with free will. Like an angry teenager, mankind would continue to not listen to God anyway. But if God didn't love us, he wouldn't have done what many of us believe he did, sent his son to save us by showing us the way; Even though most of us still ignore it and whine for instant cures to our immediate problems in exchange for our faith.
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

slave2moonlight wrote:
2099net wrote: Well, most people don't CHOOSE to live in danger zones. They're poor, and have nowhere else to go. Take the Lebanon bombing for an example. Those leaflets dropped advicing people to leave weren't exactly helpful. How could people leave who had no cars? How could people leave when the roads were bombed and the airport destroyed? They were told to go North, but the north was still bombed? Where could they go - Into Syria? Aren't we constantly being told that is worse places to CHOOSE to live? For all its faults, Lebanon was a democracy.

Life isn't always simple black/white issues and choices. Variables get in the way.
When your life is in danger because of your location, poor or not, I recommend you start walking, even if you die trying. People cross our borders everyday trying to get somewhere better. Of course, not everyone can walk, and not everyone lives right next door to a "better place." I realize that. However, it still goes back to free will. No, we don't choose to live where we are born, but somewhere along our lineage, someone did. Or maybe they were forced to, but it was someone's choice to force them. If some people get together and make a terrible government, that, too, is their decision. Yes, we suffer all over for various reasons, but it's always because we have free will and throughout history we haven't made 100% good choices with it, mainly because we refuse to love each other as brothers and sisters. We let ourselves be motivated by greed, anger, hatred, fear, lust, and all sorts of bad influences.
Don't believe what everything you may have heard on the news. Lebanon didn't have a bad govenment. It was doing well, as a tourist location after years of war and destruction. In fact, after everything the country has been through, I'm pretty sure it had an excellent government, given the rapid change in it's fortunes.

As for disarming Hezbollah, the Lebanon Government was in talks with Hezbollah when Israel invaded. Yes, progress was slow, but as we've seen, throwing bombs about solves nothing, and more people have been recruited to Hezbollah as a result of the recent conflict. The majority of the population didn't support Hezhollah, just like the majority of Northern Ireland didn't support the IRA, or the majority of Spain didn't support Eta.

Was Britain and Irelend terrible governments because we didn't disarm the IRA for over 25 years? (and in the end, manged it by talking not shooting?) Is the US a terrible government because it hasn't won the war on drugs and hasn't stopped inner-city gang culture? Again, not everything is simple back and white.

And again, where are people supposed to go? Isn't the US on a massive anti-immigrant witchhunt at the moment?
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
Post Reply