Hexed

[The Disneynerd]

Next fall, Disney Animation will release “Hexed,” an original film about an awkward teenager who discovers that he’s a wizard. “He’s pulled into a world of magic and realizes, oh, these are his people,” Mr. Bush said. “Spoiler,” he added. “Mom, who’s also trying to figure herself out, is tied to him. So it’s a mother-son buddy comedy.”

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/26/busi ... -bush.html

Im expecting this to do Strange World & Wish numbers. There doesnt seem to be some sort of charm or striking uniqueness to both the visual world and the overall synopsis. Its just a mix of modern IPs and most strikingly The Owl House.

What i was thinking lately is that the filmmakers at WDAS are constantly looking back at its legacy, desperately trying to make movies that are not too bold or different from their catalogue. Parallels to the little mermaid documentary i rewatched recently where Jeffrey Katzenberg was critizising the crew worrying "what would Walt Disney do and how would Ariel compare to Cinderella and Aurora?" and him telling them "We're not Walt, we have to be US and find our own way" and push forward. I mean imagine Mermaid not having thst bold Broadway Pop Soundtrack or Ariel having a more classic and conservative personality like Aurora yikes. Seems like nowadays the studio completely abondened that mindset and only wants to capture the essence of the past. Just throwing a boy as a protagonist to a mediocre setting and repetitive arc and storyline wont make them win their male audiences. If theyre so desperate with their legacy and a potential male audience, why cant they use their brains and draw Inspiration to Aladdin or their other successful male led successful musicals?! I guess the company forgot atp that Aladdin was the lead in his self titled movie with only Jasmine "Disney princessifying" the brand with her leading the Marketing the last few decades.

If Gigantic would have been released in 2018 (and untoubtfully been a success), they would have been reminded that male Fairytales exists and work too... RIP Gigantic

[Disney's Divinity]

I'm not sure what I expect box office-wise. It's more interesting than Strange World, but a wizard story doesn't feel "Disney," tbh, even though I'm personaly open to it even if I'd be more interested if it was a musical. Wish's numbers were likely a reflection of Stramge World, which means the numbers here will be more on Wish. I could see a slight gain from Wish's numbers, but not by much. I was more optimistic about Wish going into thst film because I didn't think one misfire (SW) would have that much of an impact that they couldn't come back from. But I think to a degree Wish also took some of the anger over the Snow White and TLM racebending since the protagonist was a character of color as well. I know I had conservative relatives who would roll their eyes when I talked about the film since I was excited by the concept art and all that, saying things like of course the lead had to be a poc because everything at the time (even remakes like Snow White and TLM where the characters had specific looks or story details that were abandoned to make room for a poc protagonist) had to feature a poc as the lead. It wasn't just a Disney-specific thing, but more generally aimed at the film industry at the time, although Disney did have more of a bull's-eye on them.

[reee9948]

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/26/busi ... -bush.html

Im expecting this to do Strange World & Wish numbers. There doesnt seem to be some sort of charm or striking uniqueness to both the visual world and the overall synopsis. Its just a mix of modern IPs and most strikingly The Owl House.

What i was thinking lately is that the filmmakers at WDAS are constantly looking back at its legacy, desperately trying to make movies that are not too bold or different from their catalogue. Parallels to the little mermaid documentary i rewatched recently where Jeffrey Katzenberg was critizising the crew worrying "what would Walt Disney do and how would Ariel compare to Cinderella and Aurora?" and him telling them "We're not Walt, we have to be US and find our own way" and push forward. I mean imagine Mermaid not having thst bold Broadway Pop Soundtrack or Ariel having a more classic and conservative personality like Aurora yikes. Seems like nowadays the studio completely abondened that mindset and only wants to capture the essence of the past. Just throwing a boy as a protagonist to a mediocre setting and repetitive arc and storyline wont make them win their male audiences. If theyre so desperate with their legacy and a potential male audience, why cant they use their brains and draw Inspiration to Aladdin or their other successful male led successful musicals?! I guess the company forgot atp that Aladdin was the lead in his self titled movie with only Jasmine "Disney princessifying" the brand with her leading the Marketing the last few decades.

If Gigantic would have been released in 2018 (and untoubtfully been a success), they would have been reminded that male Fairytales exists and work too... RIP Gigantic

I honestly think Disney need to make more older male protagonist like Aladdin, Milo, or Jim Hawkins. I don't want to make any assumptions on the male mc age for hex, but he's giving me tweens vibes.

[PatchofBlue]

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/26/busi ... -bush.html

Im expecting this to do Strange World & Wish numbers. There doesnt seem to be some sort of charm or striking uniqueness to both the visual world and the overall synopsis. Its just a mix of modern IPs and most strikingly The Owl House.

What i was thinking lately is that the filmmakers at WDAS are constantly looking back at its legacy, desperately trying to make movies that are not too bold or different from their catalogue. Parallels to the little mermaid documentary i rewatched recently where Jeffrey Katzenberg was critizising the crew worrying "what would Walt Disney do and how would Ariel compare to Cinderella and Aurora?" and him telling them "We're not Walt, we have to be US and find our own way" and push forward. I mean imagine Mermaid not having thst bold Broadway Pop Soundtrack or Ariel having a more classic and conservative personality like Aurora yikes. Seems like nowadays the studio completely abondened that mindset and only wants to capture the essence of the past. Just throwing a boy as a protagonist to a mediocre setting and repetitive arc and storyline wont make them win their male audiences. If theyre so desperate with their legacy and a potential male audience, why cant they use their brains and draw Inspiration to Aladdin or their other successful male led successful musicals?! I guess the company forgot atp that Aladdin was the lead in his self titled movie with only Jasmine "Disney princessifying" the brand with her leading the Marketing the last few decades.

If Gigantic would have been released in 2018 (and untoubtfully been a success), they would have been reminded that male Fairytales exists and work too... RIP Gigantic

That's the tricky part of the game, though. Any movie is going to inevitably be part-imitation and part-innovation, and the official story can be really inconsistent with how it designates these things. It's kind of like how I remember people hailing THOR RAGNAROK as being a gamechanger for the MCU when after I saw it, all I could think was "Ah, so I see that Marvel has decided to take the wrong lessons from Guardians of the Galaxy." Commentators will want to say that the most innovative films will inevitably be rewarded, but really it has a lot more to do with which films tell people what they want to hear.

Disney was absolutely trying to fit a mold when they set FROZEN as a CG fairy-tale musical ... and they also let themselves play with the formula by overtly rebuffing certain tropes. But the larger journalistic body definitely paid more attention to Disney publicly playing to the anti-princess crowd. But if people who loved Tangled hadn't shown up for FROZEN, the narrative would have been that Disney was trying to play it too safe by forcing another princess movie on us all.

[Disney Duster]

A male-centered wizard Disney film sounds exciting to me. Too bad it won't be hand drawn.

[DisneyJedi]

A male-centered wizard Disney film sounds exciting to me. Too bad it won't be hand drawn.

How do you know it won’t be? Have they confirmed that?

[reee9948]

A male-centered wizard Disney film sounds exciting to me. Too bad it won't be hand drawn.

How do you know it won’t be? Have they confirmed that?

I mean, there is no sign that hand drawn animation is coming back to Disney anytime soon sadly. I think all of their veterans 2d animators have let the company and Disney haven't assembled a team of 2d animators because they don't have a lot of people who can do it.

[DisneyJedi]

How do you know it won’t be? Have they confirmed that?

I mean, there is no sign that hand drawn animation is coming back to Disney anytime soon sadly. I think all of their veterans 2d animators have let the company and Disney haven't assembled a team of 2d animators because they don't have a lot of people who can do it.

To be fair, Eric Goldberg is still there and Ron Clements (or John Musker) returned as a mentor for future animators unless I’m mistaken.

Personally, if not hand-drawn, I’d like it if they go with a legit stylized CGI style that actually blends the medium with something like 2D, like Paperman. Because with what they went with for Wish, while it does look like a moving storybook illustration with a watercolor “aesthetic”, that’s just a “filter” they went with.

[Farerb]

Ron Clements returned but not to guide them in animation. Ron hasn't animated since the '80s. He returned to be a story consultant.

[reee9948]

maxresdefault(1).jpg (57.33 KiB) Viewed 227 times

This three eyed chesire creature may be the villian of the movie.

[Jules]

Are those the Zootopia 2 end credits?