bruno_wbt wrote:Yes! I really enjoyed it.

I read your comment when you posted it, but I've realized now I forgot to reply. I'm glad you enjoyed it!
I'm also glad you liked it so much,
Disney's Divinity! And you
Clindor and the others! And I'm sorry for the ones who didn't, especially the ones I know were really looking forward to it, like you
DisneyFan09. The good thing is that there's still another WDAS film this year to look forward to,
Encanto. Hopefully, you'll like that film more. I'm actually a bit surprised the response here on the forum has been a bit mixed. After watching the film, I thought everybody would like it. But it's true that it's a bit different from what we're used to from Disney in some aspects, so it's understandable it's not everyone's cup of tea. And to be honest, no one hated it, either. Personally, despite all the inspiration from live-action films and not typical Disney genres, it still felt very Disney to me. Particularly, I thought of
Aladdin several times while I was watching it, but I'm not sure what made me think of it. Maybe I'll find out next time I see it.
farerb wrote:Yes, you have a point. I'll keep that in mind when I rewatch the film.
Well, that's just my opinion. Maybe you'll see it differently and that's perfectly fine. I'll also pay more attention to that aspect next time I get to see the movie. But even if it was a bit misguided, I think the message of trust is really needed and can do more good than harm.
Clindor wrote:At D23, we had these huge landscapes of nature under the rain that could only exist in Heart, very atmospheric! It wasn’t meant to be tied to the story, but it’s a bit frustrating for such gorgeous visuals (and others) not to end up in the final story in some ways, but of course artists has to make at some point choices that will serve the story best to make it flows naturally).
It's true, all these landscapes with lots of vegetation, like the one in the Japanese poster, didn't appear in the final film, right? What a shame! Was any of the footage shown at D23 in the final film? I've rewatched the trailers and, except for a couple of shots, all of it is in the movie.
Clindor wrote:The characters in this movie are great, and very engaging. These are not the kind of characters you would usually see in a Disney movie, both in their personality, their motives, their way of dealing with the situations that come along the way, but also in their visual designs. (A baby, a giant, an old lady: what a team!!

) It’s hard to find one character whose personality isn’t appealing or engaging in here, and with whom you wouldn’t like to share their journey.
I agree. And you're right, it's a very original team.
Clindor wrote:The shots and the editing are also very interesting and gives the movie a style Disney hasn’t dared to tackle from my recollection …until now!
One thing in particular that I think hasn't been done in a WDAS film before are the titles with the name of each land, that appeared throughout the movie, which is similar to the chapter titles used in Tarantino films, for example.
Clindor wrote:I think they are here too many interconnected elements there doesn’t always genuinely blend in with one another: the impact of humans’ ways, the combat/fights of the dragons, what really created the Druuns and what they’re after, the effects of the rain/water, the quest for the gem pieces and how they work.
I get what you mean. To me, though, it all worked quite well. Perhaps because, though there were many elements, the main plot was quite clear. That said, I also wish some things had been explained a bit better.
Clindor wrote:Also I said it once with Sisu, I’d say it again quickly here: I’m not the biggest fan of the Dragon designs. It was already the case with Sisu’s final design compared to her previous ones (they were much more Disney-like! imo) I can re-confirm it with the looks of her brothers and sisters (it reminds me a bit of DreamWorks style of design.)
I finally learned to appreciate Sisu's design (though not completely), but I agree about her brothers and sisters. They look too cute and too similar to each other. I wish they had better designs. Speaking of that, one thought I had after watching the film is that all those fins Sisu had in that earlier design would've looked great when the character is in the water, but maybe not so much on land. And she's on land most of the time, so maybe that's one of the reasons for that change.
estefan wrote:Something I'm surprised hasn't been mentioned yet is how the plot somewhat resembles a recent Disney-produced blockbuster.
Raya and the Last Dragon has the characters attempt to reverse the effects of an event from six years earlier that seriously cut down the population, which involves travelling to different places to retrieve magical gems and recombine them. Isn't that the plot of Avengers: Endgame? 
I had already realized the ending would be similar if all the stone people returned at the end, but I hadn't noticed the search for the gem shards was also reminiscent of that film's plot. I wonder if they were inspired by it or it's just a coincidence.
Disney's Divinity wrote:Even though Sotiris or D82 posted a link to the End Credits song, I never listened to the whole thing. I only heard a snippet in one of the trailers posted. I actually really liked it when it came on afterwards. I love the opening lyric ("We all have a choice to build or destroy").
I quite like the song and its message, too.
Disney's Divinity wrote:Sisu's death scene was so well-done, but of course the best scene is the one where they all give their pieces of the Dragon Stone to Namaari.
I agree, that scene was perfect. One of the best endings of the Revival, in my opinion. That's one of the moments that made me tear up. The other was when Raya and her father hugged at the end, though it didn't make me as emotional as the first one.
Disney's Divinity wrote:I did find the introduction to be the weakest part of the film. I mean--why would all the leaders be gathered like that in such an informal way, without guards or anything? They made it seem more like a family gathering rather than a meeting of leaders.
I also thought it was strange the other clans didn't come more prepared, in case there was a conflict, considering they hated each other so much.
Disney's Divinity wrote:disneyprincess11 wrote:Also, telling from little animation nudges like Naamari playing with her hair around Raya, it is obvious that Raya and Naamari are supposed to be a thing, but Disney exes said no. Maybe in a sequel/spin-off?
Yes, it was obvious throughout that the two were practically obsessed with one another, constantly trying to one-up and show off to one another.
Yes, I think there were several hints at that. Kelly Marie Tran said in an interview she thinks there is some attraction between the two, but that it isn't the official Disney line.
Disney's Divinity wrote:blackcauldron85 wrote:4. Did Namaari really (at least in part) want to be friends with Raya, but then the greater good being more important than the individual took over? It reminds me of Gothel & Rapunzel: Did Namaari really ever care about Raya (I think so??), or was she using her the whole time?
To me, Namaari came in seeking to aid her people in taking the stone, but ended up liking Raya without expecting to or looking for friendship. I suppose it's because they are so similar to one another, both warrior types.
I agree. And I think Virana probably had told her daughter to try to befriend Raya in order to find out where the gem was.
Disney's Divinity wrote:blackcauldron85 wrote:19. My husband wondered why Sisu & her siblings were at the front of the "pack." Are they royalty?
I assumed they were. Why else would those five be the ones in charge of the stone? Sisu's eldest brother's horns looked almost like a crown.
It didn't occur to me they could be royalty. Maybe they are. Though I think it's also possible they were at the front because they were honored by the rest for having saved the world the first time.
Disney's Divinity wrote:And for your questions about why the dragons didn't come back from stone, I can't think of a certain answer. My guess right now is that it's because the others gave Sisu their powers in order to save humanity, and so they couldn't return because Sisu still had their power inside her possibly? But at the end, Sisu is no longer alive, and so the stone could work on everyone and everything all at the same time? I'm sure it will be something explored more in a sequel and that official books / merchandise connected to the film might give an answer. Actually, I wonder if this might be the key to explaining why all the dragons can fly at the end. Maybe since Sisu's was imbued with all the powers, the others couldn't be revived by her. When she died, perhaps the power within her entered all the dragons so that they can all wield all five powers now?
That's an interesting theory. Perhaps, you're not far wrong there. Maybe we'll also get some info about that in the artbook or on the Blu-ray, especially if there's an audio commentary.
DisneyFan09 wrote:The shadow puppet scene reminded me of the deleted scene in Mulan and the opening for The Jungle Book 2
I knew there was another film that used a similar style for the opening, but I didn't remember which one it was. Yes, it reminds of the opening for The Jungle Book 2.
DisneyFan09 wrote:The ending how everyone turned into stone took me by surprise. The same with Sisu`s death.
Those were the biggest surprises for me too.
DisneyFan09 wrote:Mooky wrote:I also thought the search for Sisu would have taken more time making the payoff and reveal stronger, but bam, it was over and done a few minutes after the sequence with young Raya.
I agree with that.
It was too rushed. I was surpised that it was shown that soon. But I guess that it was needed, since the movie needed to introduce the rest of the characters.
I was surprised by that too, but I agree it was probably needed. Apart from the fact they had to introduce the rest of the characters, Sisu is absent during most of the third act, so she needed to appear quite early to have enough screen time.
DisneyFan09 wrote:Mooky wrote:The rest of the gang was fine, save for that damn baby, that was just stupid. If they wanted a gang of thieves, monkey-things would have sufficed. A two-year (?!) old jumping around and being cognizant enough to plan and execute thefts? Give me a break.
Agreed. Noi didn`t made any sense at all. Babies aren`t supposed to remember anything or be aware of their actions. So having a con-baby? Come on!
It's a cool and original character, but I also think it's not too believable she's so smart at her age.
nomad2010 wrote:Sisu, in my opinion, needed a big moment and didn’t really get that. Yes she trusted Namaari, and that was endearing, but she needed a moment to really shine and help on the journey and I didn’t feel like she got her own big action moment or shining star moment.
Personally, I think her contribution was probably more important than anyone else's, and as I previously said, I'm glad they did something unexpected and she didn't take part in the climax or had any big action moment, but it was her wisdom and faith in humanity what was key to save the day.
nomad2010 wrote:Namaari needed a little more redemption. I enjoyed her arc, but there just was never one pure moment of “wow I’ve really messed up and I have to fix this”... it felt like more of a groan and burden to fix things than a genuine emotional moment.
Well, I agree it would've been nice if she had been a bit more repented at the end.