
Inside it there was a pamphlet about releases and it does confirm the way France count the canon:


Bonus- I managed to find my Disneyland ticket as well:





Yeah, that was a great idea.JeanGreyForever wrote:It's so neat that they included the original book plus the live-action film (or PC game in the UK).
According to Amazon France, it was released there on May 7, 2003, the same day as the first single DVD and VHS. Maybe it had already been sold out when you were there given that they usually release a much smaller number of copies of special editions like that one.farerb wrote:When was this out in France? I remember going there in 2004 and I don't remember seeing it, but it might be because I wasn't that interested in the film.
I guess you're right, otherwise they wouldn't make a distinction between "classiques" and "grand classiques". Though, regarding that, I've been searching for more info and I've found out that not always the real classics are labelled "grand classiques" and some that aren't classics sometimes have that label. The package films and the newer films from Winnie the Pooh onwards are just called "classiques" there, while some live-action/animation hybrids (So Dear to my Heart, Mary Poppins, Bedknobs and Broomsticks, Pete's Dragon), DTV sequels (A Goofy Movie, The Tigger Movie, Peter Pan 2, The Jungle Book 2, Piglet's Big Movie, Pooh's Heffalump Movie, Bambi 2, Tinker Bell's Secret of the Wings) and films made by external studios (Dinosaur, The Wild) are considered "grand classiques". I've also noticed that the most prestigious titles from WDAS, like Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs or Beauty and the Beast, are labelled "chef d'oeuvre" (masterpiece) in some editions instead of "grand classique". The Pixar titles are not always called classics in the case, but they all have the number on the spine.Jules wrote:I think in France it is not so much a canon as it is a comprehensive collection of almost every animated feature released by the Walt Disney Company. Obviously this includes films from WDAS, Pixar, DisneyToon, WDTA as well as one-offs from The Secret Lab, CORE, etc.
I thought of replying to this, but then I forgot about it. No, he's not the leader of the band, Scat Cat is. The person who wrote that made a mistake. It's odd the oriental cat is highlighted there in the poster when he's quite a secondary character. Maybe it's because he's voiced by Paul Winchell, who is the original voice of Tigger in the Winnie the Pooh films.DisneyBluLife wrote:Yes, but is he the leader of the band? Like the poster says?
Wow, really? That's surprising, especially for Norway, given that the setting is very inspired in that country. Does Norway have a different canon than Sweden then? What other differences does it have with the US canon?DisneyBluLife wrote:Frozen 2 is not a classic in Norway, but Ralph breaks the internet is.
I find that strange too. Maybe Frozen is just so strong a brand that they don't feel the need to release it under the Disney Classic label.DisneyBluLife wrote:Frozen 2 is not a classic in Norway, but Ralph breaks the internet is.


Sweden has the same canon as Norway. So Frozen 2 is not a classic because it is a sequel says Disney in Sweden. No sequels allowed if they have a number in the title I guess.D82 wrote:Wow, really? That's surprising, especially for Norway, given that the setting is very inspired in that country. Does Norway have a different canon than Sweden then? What other differences does it have with the US canon?DisneyBluLife wrote:Frozen 2 is not a classic in Norway, but Ralph breaks the internet is.
That's really curious. I wonder why they don't want sequels in the canon. But their reasoning doesn't make any sense. The fact that Ralph Breaks the Internet doesn't have a number in the title, doesn't make it less a sequel than Frozen 2. Anyway, couldn't they have changed the title for Scandinavia replacing the number with a subtitle, like for example Frozen: The Enchanted Forest, if that was the only problem?DisneyBluLife wrote:Sweden has the same canon as Norway. So Frozen 2 is not a classic because it is a sequel says Disney in Sweden. No sequels allowed if they have a number in the title I guess.















I've been saying with every new film that the French covers are taking it all and that hasn't been proven wrong with Brother Bear. Disney France is so lucky.DisneyBluLife wrote:Take me to France baby.



The way I see it is that the sequels should have been treated as a bonus feature, so they really shouldn't have been on the covers at all. The most offensive was TENG. I think Brother Bear is the last film to have a DTV sequel so fortunately we shouldn't see these anymore.D82 wrote: 13. Blu-ray: I don't like how the girl and the raccoon from the sequel (sorry, I don’t remember their names) have been included in this cover. They look too small, lack the lower half of their bodies and the style of their artwork doesn't completely match with the rest.
I agree, that would've been much preferable. I don't like that the sequels are given the same importance as the originals. But you're right, fortunately this was the last film to have a DTV sequel.farerb wrote:The way I see it is that the sequels should have been treated as a bonus feature, so they really shouldn't have been on the covers at all. The most offensive was TENG. I think Brother Bear is the last film to have a DTV sequel so fortunately we shouldn't see these anymore.






