REINIER wrote:This, like Inside Out ( worst pixar ever ...yes even worse than Cars 2)...
Oh, how dare you?

REINIER wrote:This, like Inside Out ( worst pixar ever ...yes even worse than Cars 2)...

 I guess even people who aren't that bad can't be in positions of power too long before they become the nexus of all evil.
  I guess even people who aren't that bad can't be in positions of power too long before they become the nexus of all evil.
Well, personally I don't like that she has become arrogant. I never liked Pete Docter's output, maybe except for Monsters Inc. But what I find repulsive is the way these two defend Lasseter. What are the people who were harassed by him are supposed to make of this?Disney's Divinity wrote:Yes, Inside Out is one of the few PIXAR films I like, although REINIER has a right to his opinion. I guess the time has finally come for the forum to turn on Jennifer Lee and Pete Docter now.I guess even people who aren't that bad can't be in positions of power too long before they become the nexus of all evil.
I'm just thinking this is the silver lining I didn't consider for Musker and Clements not being put in charge of WDAS; they were spared the turn from praise to hate.farerb wrote: Well, personally I don't like that she has become arrogant. I never liked Pete Docter's output, maybe except for Monsters Inc. But what I find repulsive is the way these two defend Lasseter. What are the people who were harassed by him are supposed to make of this?

Ironic coming from certain posters who are monolith of hate themselves whenever a certain Lin-Manuel Miranda's name pops up.farerb wrote:Well, personally I don't like that she has become arrogant. I never liked Pete Docter's output, maybe except for Monsters Inc. But what I find repulsive is the way these two defend Lasseter. What are the people who were harassed by him are supposed to make of this?Disney's Divinity wrote:Yes, Inside Out is one of the few PIXAR films I like, although REINIER has a right to his opinion. I guess the time has finally come for the forum to turn on Jennifer Lee and Pete Docter now.I guess even people who aren't that bad can't be in positions of power too long before they become the nexus of all evil.
 
 I have no sympathy for people like this. Regardless of how close they were to Lasseter, when dozens of women speak out against him, it's their job to listen and consider that the person they knew wasn't who they thought he was. This wasn't one person speaking out who can be waived aside easily, but countless people and frankly, all those close to Lasseter were probably aware of his problematic behavior from the very beginning. By continuing to defend him, all in the name of friendship, what they're doing is invalidating the experiences of those brave enough to speak out about the harassment they received and the trauma they incurred. They are complicit and part of the problem by perpetuating this cycle.Kyle wrote:Its easy to throw shade when on the outside looking in. Its a lot more difficult to see things objectively when you feel you know a person personally, and they never mistreated you, possibly never even mistreated others in your presence. It causes a lot of conflicting emotions that can take many years to be open to the idea that maybe they aren't the person you thought they were. I do not blame these people at all.
Yeah, that's not going to go over very well considering how much flack PATF got and that was before the age of social media.DisneyJedi wrote:So apparently, according to some guy on Twitter, this new movie is the next Disney film in a list of those with African American leads that are “done dirty” (in other words, transformed into a different form and not spending the whole movie as a human), along The Princess and the Frog and Spies In Disguise.


The fact that people want Jennifer Lee to be ashamed for vague comments about her experience with John Lasseter while simultaneously advocating for Hans’ redemption in the Frozen thread, to be in a film that hundreds of millions of children will grow up with as an example, is pretty hilarious.Kyle wrote:Its easy to throw shade when on the outside looking in. Its a lot more difficult to see things objectively when you feel you know a person personally, and they never mistreated you, possibly never even mistreated others in your presence. It causes a lot of conflicting emotions that can take many years to be open to the idea that maybe they aren't the person you thought they were. I do not blame these people at all.
 
 That has already been known for a while, I thought? The synopsis was that he turns into a soul for most of the movie, and they even showed his soul design. I agree that it’ll probably cause controversy considering they’ve done this before, which will make people more suspicious about it.DisneyJedi wrote:So apparently, according to some guy on Twitter, this new movie is the next Disney film in a list of those with African American leads that are “done dirty” (in other words, transformed into a different form and not spending the whole movie as a human), along The Princess and the Frog and Spies In Disguise.

Hm-hm! Yup!JeanGreyForever wrote:Ironic coming from certain posters who are monolith of hate themselves whenever a certain Lin-Manuel Miranda's name pops up.
Yes, I agree. Preach!JeanGreyForever wrote:I have no sympathy for people like this. Regardless of how close they were to Lasseter, when dozens of women speak out against him, it's their job to listen and consider that the person they knew wasn't who they thought he was. This wasn't one person speaking out who can be waived aside easily, but countless people and frankly, all those close to Lasseter were probably aware of his problematic behavior from the very beginning. By continuing to defend him, all in the name of friendship, what they're doing is invalidating the experiences of those brave enough to speak out about the harassment they received and the trauma they incurred. They are complicit and part of the problem by perpetuating this cycle.Kyle wrote:Its easy to throw shade when on the outside looking in. Its a lot more difficult to see things objectively when you feel you know a person personally, and they never mistreated you, possibly never even mistreated others in your presence. It causes a lot of conflicting emotions that can take many years to be open to the idea that maybe they aren't the person you thought they were. I do not blame these people at all.
Well in the Toy Story's it's more about toys than humans. In Inside Out it's more about emotions than humans. In Coco it's more about, actually, souls/spirits than the color of skin the characters have when alive during the duration of the film. I wish people got that all Pixar films usually don't show the humans, or their skin color, that much, unless it's like The Incredibles and maybe some others?DisneyJedi wrote:Apparently, Disney is getting flack for this whole “African American lead gets turned into something and spends most of movie as that and not as a human” thing because... Well, the African American leads aren’t human for most of their screen time. And some folks see a huge issue with that.

Sorry, I was thinking about Clindor's comments about Lee in another thread when I wrote that.farerb wrote:I don't recall that I ever defended Hans or that I want him to be redeemed. I actually thought he should have been executed because that's what you get for trying to assassinate the queen. That is if Frozen had a believable worldbuilding and not a hot mess of politics.

Rightfully so. I mean, when it happens once, it can be argued as a story choice. When it keeps happening, naturally people are going to start to suspect Disney is trying to find a way to have their cake and eat it, too--having a black lead without actually showing a black character for the whole film.DisneyJedi wrote:Apparently, Disney is getting flack for this whole “African American lead gets turned into something and spends most of movie as that and not as a human” thing because... Well, the African American leads aren’t human for most of their screen time. And some folks see a huge issue with that.

 
  

Disney's Divinity wrote:Jennifer Lee made some comments about her experience working with Lasseter that people felt weren't forceful enough because she didn't acknowledge he's a monster at the end of them which means she's also a monster now and several posters want her to be cancelled. Here they are, at the top of the page. And here.
 
   Ok, yeah. This judgment on Lee is too harsh because there's a good reason Lee has to remain neutral. There are legal circumstances if she divulges false information. It's not like she said, "Oh yeah, he sexually assaulted young women, but he's an artist." *cough* Polanski *cough*. It's more like "He liked Frozen. He said congratulations. I'm not the best person to talk about the assault. I'm not qualified to be legally involved. Please ask someone else."
  Ok, yeah. This judgment on Lee is too harsh because there's a good reason Lee has to remain neutral. There are legal circumstances if she divulges false information. It's not like she said, "Oh yeah, he sexually assaulted young women, but he's an artist." *cough* Polanski *cough*. It's more like "He liked Frozen. He said congratulations. I'm not the best person to talk about the assault. I'm not qualified to be legally involved. Please ask someone else." 
