
Maybe your son was dying to see Frozen too and wanted to get out to physically see it

I have a feeling David is going to make an exception for Hans. (He should do Gaston too while he's at it)Flanger-Hanger wrote:Why would Hans be in the Heroes series?Warm Regards wrote:^ I'm personally waiting for a Hans one, but I approve of Kristoff.
I agree, and I can't wait. I think Gaston's face is too cartoony to work though.DancingCrab wrote: I have a feeling David is going to make an exception for Hans.
The chocolate Anna eats in For The First Time In Forever is taken from the Sugar Rush level from Wreck-It Ralph.Toky wrote:Saw the movie yesterday, and planning on seeing it again tomorrow….Have to say, I love it…massively(didn't like Get a horse, not at all :S)
I think Disney finally is getting back at the top were they were once, and I dare to say that if they would release a classic 2D animated feature right now it would become a hit again. I mean, I live in the Netherlands and in my city they decided to play the original 3D version just once a day. At 16.30 pm, not a great time for a movie to play. But the cinema was full of people, not with kids, but adults….And the best part was their reaction to it. Everyone was laughing, 'aw-ing', and even clapping(when anna gives a certain person a big smack), which was the first time in my life I heard a dutch person giving applause to a movie.
Disney, you can say whatever you like, but the world is craving for your fairytale musicals!
The songs are really great and broadway-esque and especially the first part of the film is stuffed with classic disney momentsThe highlight for me was the reprise of For the first time in forever…and the part were Anna dances along all the classic paintings.
Did anyone else see some easter eggs, besides Rapunzel and Eugene?
Maybe one of Elsa's powers is...taei wrote:I don't know why.. But I'm loving the tilt on this video.. even more than the actual clip itself.. of course, the castle being sideways is impossible, but I mean.. The scene where she transformers her dress and her walk and the staircase scene look so much better than the original version...
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkGn_oMIn9Y[/youtube]
enigmawing wrote:I finally got to see it at the theater Tuesday night . . . where I went into labor 9 days early.![]()
I'm now at home with a beautiful little baby boy.
No word if he has any ice powers or not.
~I can't believe I actually predicted that here.enigmawing wrote:I suppose it would be fitting of me to go into labor while watching a Disney movie though.
Naw, if he made Hercules, who is even more stylized, work, he can make Gaston work.I agree, and I can't wait. I think Gaston's face is too cartoony to work though.
They were friends, not lovers. And Elsa's homosexual connotation is only half there. Instead of being free to be herself around people, she leaves any human contact behind and that includes love with other people which homosexuality is about.Big One wrote:The ice power is just an analogy for homosexuality, though. Especially since the sisters were two lovers in the original work in terms of the role they play in the movie they're basically Kai and Gerda.
Yes, "Frozen" was definitively overhyped. I liked it, I won't say that it ranks upon the early Renaissance films at all.Cheshire_Cat wrote:Okay, this post is not going to gain me many friends, but I saw Frozen today, and I was very underwhelmed. Maybe it's because it's been hyped up so much that I went into the theater with high expectations for it (only to have them let down slightly after seeing a preview for some ridiculous toilet humor-filled kiddie movie) that it was natural for me to be a little disappointed.
My problems with the movie were that I felt Anna was way too goofy for me to take seriously as a heroine, it felt rushed, and overall it felt too much like a kiddie film to me. I think the highest point of this film was the Let It Go sequence, which I thought was amazing.
Maybe I'll feel differently after viewing it a second time, but I was a little disappointed. I'm not saying I didn't think it was good, but I didn't think it was amazing, either.
Ooooh! Congratulations!enigmawing wrote:I finally got to see it at the theater Tuesday night . . . where I went into labor 9 days early.![]()
I'm now at home with a beautiful little baby boy.
No word if he has any ice powers or not.
~I can't believe I actually predicted that here.enigmawing wrote:I suppose it would be fitting of me to go into labor while watching a Disney movie though.
Cheshire_Cat wrote:Okay, this post is not going to gain me many friends, but I saw Frozen today, and I was very underwhelmed. Maybe it's because it's been hyped up so much that I went into the theater with high expectations for it (only to have them let down slightly after seeing a preview for some ridiculous toilet humor-filled kiddie movie) that it was natural for me to be a little disappointed.
My problems with the movie were that I felt Anna was way too goofy for me to take seriously as a heroine, it felt rushed, and overall it felt too much like a kiddie film to me. I think the highest point of this film was the Let It Go sequence, which I thought was amazing.
Maybe I'll feel differently after viewing it a second time, but I was a little disappointed. I'm not saying I didn't think it was good, but I didn't think it was amazing, either.
DisneyFan09 wrote:Yes, "Frozen" was definitively overhyped. I liked it, I won't say that it ranks upon the early Renaissance films at all.
Sure, there were many parts who were juvenile and felt like a kiddie movie, which clashed with the heavier, more serious tone of the scenes with Elsa. Which is the films major problem. Another problem was the underwhelming score Christope Beck. However, I did like the first half better and the film did have some good parts here and there.
Now if Disney would give this film a proper blu ray release, with many good Bonus Features and even an Audio Commentary, I would have appreciated it.
Yes, that's exactly how I feel. These latest Disney movies just try too hard to be hip and cutesy. It seems that the princesses of the latest three eras have distinct personalities: the Walt-era princesses are graceful and kind, the Renaissance-era princesses are spunky and adventurous, and the modern era princesses are cutesy and klutzy. That's my take on it.unprincess wrote:no youre right, its not the 2nd coming of the Disney renaissance as they are hyping it up to be. Those days are long gone. Did you see how awful most of the trailers for all those upcoming animated films are? Unfortunately thats the norm when it comes to the modern animated film, thats what the american movie goer (& film studio) expects an animated film is supposed to be. Compared to that, this movie is a blessing.
I agree about Anna(all the leads really had this "act too modern" problem to some degree) but I guess Im getting used to it now... it bothered me more when I saw Tangled.