Maleficent (Live-Action)

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
estefan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3195
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:27 pm

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by estefan »

I think this has a lot of potential. Got a really cool vibe from the trailer.

As for Aurora having a British accent, isn't Sleeping Beauty (the Disney version, anyway) supposed to take place in Great Britain? Or is it France? Either way, the British accent is typically used in movies to represent a faraway, other world.
"There are two wolves and they are always fighting. One is darkness and despair. The other is light and hope. Which wolf wins? Whichever one you feed." - Casey Newton, Tomorrowland
robster16
Special Edition
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by robster16 »

After watching the trailer I must say I feel like the art direction is compleeeetely off... magical tiny elves and fantasy characters? I would have gone full out on the real life translation of the Eyvind Earle look myself. Not impressed by the look and the angle of the story has me worried...
Image
User avatar
Lady Cluck
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1022
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:10 pm
Location: New York

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by Lady Cluck »

LMAO at that trailer. What a disaster this film will be :lol: :lol: :lol:

She does have the laugh down I guess.
LADY Image CLUCK
User avatar
disneyprincess11
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4363
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:46 am
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by disneyprincess11 »

Heck, they even didn't get Aurora's dress right when she sleeps and pricks her finger.

…That’s not good…..
FigmentJedi
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 418
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:06 pm

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by FigmentJedi »

Those thorns look like they were produced on a TV budget.
User avatar
Toky
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 310
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:18 am
Location: the Netherlands

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by Toky »

Elle in Wonderland....o no wait :p

And Disney, whats up with those odd looking mermaid-ish/minimoy elves :o
The only thing that makes me curious is how the famous spindle scene will turn out...
User avatar
SWillie!
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2564
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:28 am

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by SWillie! »

disneyprincess11 wrote:Heck, they even didn't get Aurora's dress right when she sleeps and pricks her finger.

…That’s not good…..
They aren't trying to literally just remake the animated film in live action, that would be dumb. Of course things are going to be different.
Image
User avatar
Old Fish Tale
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 7:19 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by Old Fish Tale »

It looks better than I thought it would. And it's clear the plot isn't the same as 'Sleeping Beauty'.
DisneyDude2010
Special Edition
Posts: 815
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:48 am

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by DisneyDude2010 »

Absolutely hate the trailer, especially Elle Fannings awful English accent! (nobody in the U.K. speaks like that I can assure you :lol: )
I also agree with the others that dislike the art directions, it looks like a live action Tinker Bell movie, and the CG of the thorns surrounding the castle just do not appeal to me, at all.

However, I do think Angelina's portrayal of the role is quite fitting. She's seemed to have captured Maleficence's tone and persona. I do however think Maleficent should have more of a green tone to her skin.

Over all I am underwhelmed, Not anticipating this film at all.
Image
All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them. - Walt Disney
User avatar
Kraken Guard
Special Edition
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:47 pm
Location: The Flying Dutchman

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by Kraken Guard »

... Is it sad that I'm hoping that this crashes and burns?

I do not want the original Maleficent being forgotten, and replaced by Angelina Jolie...

Think what you will. I am not happy. Not in the slightest. And it boils me that they advertise the movie like it's a prequel to the original Disney tale, when it's anything but.
Image
User avatar
lord-of-sith
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2288
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 7:03 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him/His)

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by lord-of-sith »

I really love the look of the trailer. The thorns (at least to me) look amazing, and Angelina's portrayal of Maleficent seems very in line with the original film.

Now, I will admit to probably being this film's biggest defender, despite all of the drawbacks that it already has. We know 100% for a fact that the story has been changed form the original. I don't mind this at all. We have the original film, and it's a classic that has already stood the test of time and will be around forever. A new take on the story with different plot elements is just fine by me. The character of Maleficent is by far my favorite thing about the original, so as long as her persona is kept in tact, I'll be satisfied. As far as I can tell, that is absolutely the case. Angelina has the aura and the laugh down, and everything we've seen so far indicates that she understands what makes the character great.

Would it be cool to get a movie that lines up perfectly with the original, sure, but that is not what we're getting. We can't change what the film is going to be, so why waste time complaining about things we don't like, and appreciating the things about it that are good? I'm a huge Maleficent fan, so I'm just grateful that a film like this was even considered, let alone being marketed as Disney's summer tent pole!
User avatar
Musical Master
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1528
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:53 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by Musical Master »

lord-of-sith wrote:I really love the look of the trailer. The thorns (at least to me) look amazing, and Angelina's portrayal of Maleficent seems very in line with the original film.

Now, I will admit to probably being this film's biggest defender, despite all of the drawbacks that it already has. We know 100% for a fact that the story has been changed form the original. I don't mind this at all. We have the original film, and it's a classic that has already stood the test of time and will be around forever. A new take on the story with different plot elements is just fine by me. The character of Maleficent is by far my favorite thing about the original, so as long as her persona is kept in tact, I'll be satisfied. As far as I can tell, that is absolutely the case. Angelina has the aura and the laugh down, and everything we've seen so far indicates that she understands what makes the character great.

Would it be cool to get a movie that lines up perfectly with the original, sure, but that is not what we're getting. We can't change what the film is going to be, so why waste time complaining about things we don't like, and appreciating the things about it that are good? I'm a huge Maleficent fan, so I'm just grateful that a film like this was even considered, let alone being marketed as Disney's summer tent pole!
Yeah, at first I thought that Oz: The Great and Powerful was going to be an intolerable mess, but when I saw the movie it was good, not great, but not bad either. The teaser is really good especially when Jolie spoke and that laugh at the end was spot on. I'm giving this movie a chance, even if the story is weird beyond belief.
Disney, Pixar, Rodgers and Hammerstein, and Cinema fan
User avatar
Kraken Guard
Special Edition
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:47 pm
Location: The Flying Dutchman

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by Kraken Guard »

Maleficent was already great as she was. She didn't need a movie where she's painted as the misunderstood black sheep of the family.

They're advertising the movie like it's a prequel, when it's not.
Image
User avatar
Scamander
Special Edition
Posts: 596
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:19 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by Scamander »

estefan wrote:As for Aurora having a British accent, isn't Sleeping Beauty (the Disney version, anyway) supposed to take place in Great Britain? Or is it France?
Both Kings have German names and it is full of German symbolism, so for me it will always take place in Germany.
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5207
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by PatrickvD »

Yeah this is going to be a HUGE misfire. An overabundance of visual effects and a silly approach.

Not looking forward to this at all. The Inception music wasn't helping either. Can we ban that already?!?!?!
DancingCrab
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1030
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:20 pm

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by DancingCrab »

Kraken Guard wrote:They're advertising the movie like it's a prequel, when it's not.
Well it IS both a prequel and remake(re-imagining) since the story starts off way before Aurora's birth and then goes through a fractured version of the fairy tale's events.

Personally, I'm on the "I'll wait before condemning or praising it" wagon. I think she looks and sounds stunning as Mal, but what I've heard about the originally proposed plot sounds stupid. I'm hoping this turns out good, but I'm not holding my breath for it either.
User avatar
ProfessorRatigan
Special Edition
Posts: 668
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:10 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by ProfessorRatigan »

When I first heard about this project, I groaned. "Maleficent given a sympathetic back-story!? NO! She's THE MISTRESS OF ALL EVIL! She has no redeeming qualities! She openly and CHEERFULLY calls upon the POWERS OF HELL in the film," I said to myself.

The leaked images, the poster and, now, the trailer have done little in the way of assuaging me of my wariness... I consider Sleeping Beauty to be one of my all-time favorite animated films. But one thing has actually given me a shred of hope for this film: that fact that it was co-written by Paul Dini.

Paul Dini. The best writer of Batman stories in modern history. Especially when it comes to villains like Mr. Freeze, The Joker and The Riddler. This is the man who MADE Mr. Freeze the towering, utterly tragic and heartbreaking figure he was in the Animated Series. "Think of it, Batman: to never again walk on a summer's day, or to feel a hot wind in your face... To never again know the touch of a warm hand. Oh, yes... I'd kill for that..."

Gah! If Dini is able to transform Maleficent into such a figure, I might just see this film. And if he brings any of the twisted humor he usually supplies the Joker with (Seriously, just read the issue of Detective Comics titled Slayride) then maybe, just maybe, this film won't totally suck balls.
User avatar
Musical Master
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1528
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:53 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by Musical Master »

ProfessorRatigan wrote:When I first heard about this project, I groaned. "Maleficent given a sympathetic back-story!? NO! She's THE MISTRESS OF ALL EVIL! She has no redeeming qualities! She openly and CHEERFULLY calls upon the POWERS OF HELL in the film," I said to myself.

The leaked images, the poster and, now, the trailer have done little in the way of assuaging me of my wariness... I consider Sleeping Beauty to be one of my all-time favorite animated films. But one thing has actually given me a shred of hope for this film: that fact that it was co-written by Paul Dini.

Paul Dini. The best writer of Batman stories in modern history. Especially when it comes to villains like Mr. Freeze, The Joker and The Riddler. This is the man who MADE Mr. Freeze the towering, utterly tragic and heartbreaking figure he was in the Animated Series. "Think of it, Batman: to never again walk on a summer's day, or to feel a hot wind in your face... To never again know the touch of a warm hand. Oh, yes... I'd kill for that..."

Gah! If Dini is able to transform Maleficent into such a figure, I might just see this film. And if he brings any of the twisted humor he usually supplies the Joker with (Seriously, just read the issue of Detective Comics titled Slayride) then maybe, just maybe, this film won't totally suck balls.
There was a user on IMDB who had seen a screening of Maleficent and said that it was better than he expected (by saying that it was good) and that it differs from the leaked script in good amount of places, also he confirmed that there is a good number of dark humor in the movie. So Paul Dini's revisions must've helped.
Disney, Pixar, Rodgers and Hammerstein, and Cinema fan
User avatar
disneyprincess11
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4363
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:46 am
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by disneyprincess11 »

^^PLEASE PLEASE let him be right :huh: Because yeah, the trailer was awesome
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Maleficent (2014): Official Discussion

Post by Super Aurora »

Saw the trailer. Looks like shit. another movie I'll skip.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
Post Reply