It didn't?Dream Huntress wrote:It did?Sky Syndrome wrote: I don't see why not. A Goofy Movie worked.![]()
I think most generally agree that it's definitely one of the best sequels/spinoffs/chepquels/etc...
It didn't?Dream Huntress wrote:It did?Sky Syndrome wrote: I don't see why not. A Goofy Movie worked.![]()
I enjoy A Goofy Movie a lot more than some of the DAC's.SWillie! wrote:It didn't?Dream Huntress wrote: It did?![]()
I think most generally agree that it's definitely one of the best sequels/spinoffs/chepquels/etc...
I like the movie quite a bit too, but I wasn't aware the movie was actually succesful. Gonna check that one out.enigmawing wrote:I enjoy A Goofy Movie a lot more than some of the DAC's.SWillie! wrote: It didn't?
I think most generally agree that it's definitely one of the best sequels/spinoffs/chepquels/etc...
There's this from Bleeding Cool regarding future projects in the Hat Building:
... I did take a second to enquire about what [Disney veteran Burny] Mattinson will be working on next. And while it’s early days for his new project, it does sound like the perfect follow-up to Pooh.
He said:
I am working on just an idea of my own which is basically a Mickey, Donald, Goofy feature film idea. We have to present it first to the bosses to get the green light. ...
As it happened, I talked to Mr. Mattinson a bit of a while ago (the audio for which will appear here next Monday and Tuesday) and we chit-chatted about projects that he's developed and worked on over the years that never made it to production. One of those projects -- in the 1980s -- was Mickey, Donald and Goofy in a version of The Three Musketeers. As Burny said when we spoke:
"That earlier version was a lot different than the direct-to-video version that came out a long time later. Ours was going to be more action-oriented, like the book."
It's a shame that Burny's version never got made. But then, I've long thought it sad that the Mouse, the Duck and the Goof haven't made it into anything longer than a featurette. They deserve a format that's longer. They deserve to have their own full-length franchise.
Who knows? Maybe Mr. Mattinson will make that happen. He's got Mickey-Donald-Goofy storyboards in his office that look spiffy.
major overstatement. He's still a huge logo and there's still MMC that gets its share of ads on DVDs.Super Aurora wrote:At least this shows Disney has not forgot about Mickey mouse and willing give him more spotlight. I mean when was last time Disney even promote or advertise the mouse? In the 90's he was like all over the place like my fart radiate all over the room.
I bet you kids this gen wouldn't even know who the fuck mickey mouse even is.

exactlyDream Huntress wrote:Well, maybe if Disney had more animated features with interesting concepts in actual production, like other companies, we wouldn't digress so much.Avaitor wrote:I think it shows the interest of this board when a thread which is about a potential new movie from Disney is turned into a discussion about arguably the most overused viral sensation this side of Rick Astley
Agreed. IT IS disappointing that it won't be something like The Snow Queen, but hey it'sDisneyJedi wrote:Here's to hoping this rumor is true. We (probably) NEED Mickey and the gang back on the silver screen again.
Hey, Disnnnney! Time to take ideas from fans! PLEASEEEE DO THIS!Hmm, Disney has reacquired the rights to Oswald the Lucky Rabbit but they have said they’re waiting for the appropriate time to reintroduce him as a major character… could he perhaps have a role in this film?
Lol, classic.PatrickvD wrote:'Disney essence-war' in 3... 2.... 1.... and GO
I agree it would be nice to see an adaptation of Epic Mickey, at least that would mean that Oswald would finally be included. Either way, I like the sound of this; these characters have stood the test of time for the best part of a century so I don't see why a good film couldn't be produced based on them.MJW wrote:I wonder if they'd do more of a classic tale, like Mickey's Christmas Carol/The Prince and the Pauper, or attempt something more modern/cutting-edge, ala along the lines of the Epic Mickey storyline

The war and budgets have been documented as reasons behind the shortening of the feature, but was it ever documented that Walt made the decision because "it wasn't good?" Why is this assumption even thrown into the equation? Do you have any basis for it beyond your presumption of knowing what Walt would have wanted?Disney Duster wrote:I know about Mickey and the Beanstalk, but that never happened,and I know people say it was because of the war and budget, but perhaps Walt also decided it wasn't good to use Mickey and the gang for a whole feature, actually.