Changing Black and White Films

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
disneyfella
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1264
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 1:49 pm
Location: Small-Town America
Contact:

Changing Black and White Films

Post by disneyfella »

As promised, here is a quick essay I put together about a topic that often goes undiscussed.






Colorizing Disney: An essay on a short lived craze to colorize black-and-white content
By Aaron Willcott


Just imagine seeing Bergman and Bogie do their ‘here’s lookin’ at you kid’ scene from “Casablanca”….in color! Would it enhance the scene? How about seeing Jimmy Stewart contemplate suicide in “It’s a Wonderful Life”….in color! Would you feel his humanity more? Maybe watch Hitchcock’s “Psycho” in color and finally see if it really would be ‘too gory’ as Sir Hitchcock said it would be.

In the 1980s, a company called “Color Systems Technology, Inc.” patented a method of colorizing black-and-white film. Initially they were only colorizing footage of the moon’s surface taken from black-and-white films from American astronauts. Then they worked on black-and-white newsreel footage for a documentary on Martin Luther King. In 1985, though, the world was awestruck when the black-and-white film “Topper” (1937) was re-released and the world saw the movie in color for the very first time!

Image

Even in the beginning there was controversy. Despite the financial success of the newly colorized “Topper” (1937), several Hollywood giants like Jimmy Stewart, John Huston, and Woody Allen all spoke out against the process. They thought colorizing black-and-white films was like painting over the Mona Lisa. Why would you try to work on someone else’s art when it didn’t really need fixing in the first place?

On the other hand, though, you had some Hollywood heavyweights who supported the process. Not only was it a lucrative way to gain more money out of tired old films, but several celebrities publicly endorsed the process. Cary Grant often spoke of his delight in the colorizing of “Topper” (1937). Frank Capra actually approached one company, Colorization Inc., to see if they would colorize “It’s a Wonderful Life”, “Meet John Doe”, and “Lady for a Day”. The contracts were signed, but only ‘Wonderful Life’ ever was completed.

Image

When Ted Turner began restoring the vast library of titles he acquired, he embraced the colorization process as a way to breathe new life into films and offered a way to make old films accessible to contemporary audiences. He famously told critics of the colorization process that he was planning on converting “Citizen Kane” into a colorized picture. This prompted the response, “Keep Ted Turner and his damn crayons away from my movie,” from Orson Welles (who had creative control of the picture from his original contract).

Disney wasn’t immune to the new craze sweeping over the entertainment industry. They had a new premium cable channel, and several black-and-white properties that would be perfect for exhibition. The first Disney product to receive colorization was “The Absent Minded Professor” (1961). In March of 1986 it premiered on The Disney Channel and the world saw flubber for the first time…..in color!

Image

Although released on VHS in 1981 in black-and-white, Disney re-released “The Absent-Minded Professor” (1961) on VHS in 1986. They could entice audiences to perhaps ‘double dip’ for the first time so they could have the film in color. The colorization didn’t stop there. Next up was changing the 1959 comedy “The Shaggy Dog”. The first live-action comedy from Disney (and the first screen pairing of Fred MacMurray with Tommy Kirk), would be re-introduced to audiences who had never experienced the ‘cursed Borgia ring’ or the wacky slapstick of changing into a dog.

Image

Again Disney re-released “The Shaggy Dog” (1959) on video in a newly colorized version to cash in on the process. Perhaps the most ambitious of all projects undertaken by Disney, though, was the colorization of the much loved “Zorro” (1957) television series. Despite the failure of the short-lived “Zorro and Son” on CBS in the early 1980s, Disney knew they had an invaluable asset in their catalog. Though Zorro had been airing on television off-and-on for decades, and already had its run on The Disney Channel, Disney colorized the series and re-aired it on television prompting viewers to return and watch ‘The Fox’ defeat Monastario all over again.

Image

“Zorro” (1957) would mark the last asset that the Disney Company would colorize. The process was an expensive and slow one. It would take about an hour to complete only 1 minute of footage, and it cost approximately $180,000 in 1986 to colorize a 90 minute feature. The monetary returns simply weren’t there. Despite video sales and re-releases, the critical backlash and bored audiences led to the end of the colorization craze.

With the invention of DVD, however, colorizing old films is beginning to make a come-back. DVD offers the option of viewing films in several different versions, and releases like “Topper” (1937), “My Man Godfrey” (1936) and “Night of the Living Dead” (1968) have all been quite successful. Several studios have re-colorized certain films. Sony recently undertook a brand new colorization process and released newly colorized films like “Earth vs. the Flying Saucers” (1956) and “20 Million Miles to Earth” (1957) in stunning transfers.

Image

So what becomes of these colorized films? Do they have a place in film history? Should they be locked away, never to be seen again? Worse yet, should their video tape masters be destroyed and that period in Hollywood forgotten? In a day and age where the consumer is offered several different versions of a film (i.e. a theatrical cut, a director’s cut, a producer’s cut, a European cut, and an unrated cut), perhaps these maligned colorized versions can find a shelf life next to their amalgamated counterparts. Maybe there is as much validity in a colorized version of a film as there is for an ‘unrated cut’.

These colorized versions, whether you like them or not, were created and played some small part in the life of these films. They deserve to be preserved and cleaned up and shown like all other versions. As long as the original black-and-white medium the film was created in is available, why not share these forgotten artistic interpretations? There will hardly be a huge following for the colorized versions, but their mere existence peaks the curiosity of the typical cinephile.
"It's Kind Of Fun To Do The Impossible"
- Walt Disney

Image
User avatar
drfsupercenter
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1279
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:59 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Post by drfsupercenter »

I feel the same way with movies like Casablanca.

It's actually a popularly-spread idea to somehow separate the chroma and luma from that one VHS, then merge it with the luma of the HD-DVD or Blu-Ray to get a high definition color version.

I'm not sure why everyone hates the process so much... as long as they provide the original black and white version, it's fun to see the colorized one. Like they did for the original Miracle on 34th Street. They released a two-DVD set where one was colorized and one was the original.
Image

Howard Ashman:
He gave a mermaid her voice, a beast his soul, and Arabs something to complain about
Arabian Nights (Unedited)
Savages (Uncensored)
If it ain't OTV, it ain't worth anything!
User avatar
slave2moonlight
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4427
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: TX
Contact:

Post by slave2moonlight »

I have no use/interest in colorized films myself, but I don't have a problem with it as long as the black and white versions are just as available. I recently viewed my DVD of "A Christmas Wish", AKA "The Great Rupert", which was largely toting its colorization but also came with the black and white version. Well, even cast member (the beautiful) Terry Moore was loving the look of the colorization, but I couldn't see why they liked it so much (her and the other people doing the commentary) because I thought it looked so unnatural, especially the Christmas trees that were a warm green instead of a natural, cooler shade. I definitely gave the black and white version more viewings this Christmas.
User avatar
Escapay
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 12562
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Somewhere in Time and Space
Contact:

Post by Escapay »

As always, an excellent essay, Aaron.

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

I think I say it best that when it comes to colourisation: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" ;)

However, I do think that colourisation is beneficial for rare instances...

Such as 1970s "Doctor Who" episodes where the original color episodes are lost, and all that remain are 16mm black and white film prints.

There actually is a coming-in-2009-but-not-yet-scheduled DVD release of a story where one episode (Planet of the Daleks: Episode 3) is only available in black and white, and so the Restoration Team hired Legend Films to make a colourised version. Then, the revolutionary and still-new process of Colour Recovery came about, in which they were able to recover the actual colour signal (well, as best they could) that was still on the b/w film (on a residual subcarrier). With both the Legend colourisation and the Colour Recovery, the end result is astounding. The RT Article explains it better than I ever could, and even has screen caps. Just thought it'd be a cool tie-in to your essay, Aaron.

But relating this back to Disney, I recently picked up the colourised version of The Absent-Minded Professor (bad Scaps!) simply for comparison purposes, and also because it was free (buy 3 get 1 free at MovieStop, figured it wouldn't hurt to get a free colourised film). I have yet to get the original black and white, but I plan on getting it in the two-movie incarnation with Son of Flubber. Kill two birds with one stone, yay!

Also, I had these old caps lying around for Shaggy Dog which is another example of how...icky...early colourisation was.

Image

Image

Image

First cap is matted theatrical widescreen, second is unmatted colourised, third cap is a b/w version of the colourised. It also shows the inferior video quality of the colourised version.

albert
Last edited by Escapay on Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
WIST #60:
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion? :p

WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
User avatar
drfsupercenter
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1279
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:59 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Post by drfsupercenter »

What? That third screenshot looks just like the first one to me!

The low quality... well, maybe that's just because they restored it before computers? I'm sure it could exist in a higher quality if Disney really wanted it to...
Image

Howard Ashman:
He gave a mermaid her voice, a beast his soul, and Arabs something to complain about
Arabian Nights (Unedited)
Savages (Uncensored)
If it ain't OTV, it ain't worth anything!
User avatar
disneyfella
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1264
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 1:49 pm
Location: Small-Town America
Contact:

Post by disneyfella »

The actual process used to convert the Disney films into color by Color Systems Technology, Inc. makes it sound like it would be rather hard to restore the colorized prints.

Apparently the conversion process is a bit of a paint-by-numbers one. Technicians called "colorists" choose hues from an electronic palette, and the computer repeats those colors onto a videotape of a black-and-white film.

In other words, while we can always go back to the original negatives for the black and white film, the colorized version can only be as good as the videotape master used in the initial colorization process. The only alternative to improving the colorized version would be to completely start from the beginning and re-colorize the film using modern technology.

There is still an opportunity for preservation, but when the source material is videotape you can only maintain so much. At least they are able to release those colorized versions still. Thankfully their black-and-white counterparts also get released (and lovingly restored too!).
"It's Kind Of Fun To Do The Impossible"
- Walt Disney

Image
yukitora
Special Edition
Posts: 947
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:01 am
Location: at home apparently
Contact:

Post by yukitora »

I didn't read the essay, sorry. But I saw pictures of Jimmy Stewart (It's A Wonderful Life) so I'm happy :D

With technology today colourisation isn't so bad. What did people think of the colourised version of The Wizard of Oz? I'm not sure if that falls into the same category, but its the same principle.
User avatar
Flanger-Hanger
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3746
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Location: S.H.I.E.L.D. Headquarters

Post by Flanger-Hanger »

yukitora wrote:What did people think of the colourised version of The Wizard of Oz?
?

The film was made in 3-strip Technicolor. Are you saying they colourized the beginning and ending sequences, because if they did that's ridiculous because it destroys the intended contrast between the real world and Oz.
Image
User avatar
Chernabog_Rocks
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2213
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 2:00 am
Location: New West, BC

Post by Chernabog_Rocks »

Isn't there two version of the Wizard of Oz opening/ending sequences where one is black and white and the other has a more sepia tone? Or am I just thinking of something totally different.
My Disney focused instagram: disneyeternal
User avatar
blackcauldron85
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16691
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:54 am
Gender: Female
Contact:

Post by blackcauldron85 »

That is a really well-written essay, Aaron! If a movie was made in black & white, I prefer watching it in black & white...a small part of that may be due to the inferior quality of a colorized print, but I just...I don't know how to describe it. Maybe I like the classicness/old-timeliness feel of a black and white film?
Image
User avatar
feedmelinguini
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 12:22 pm
Location: Akron, Ohio

Post by feedmelinguini »

Chernabog_Rocks wrote:Isn't there two version of the Wizard of Oz opening/ending sequences where one is black and white and the other has a more sepia tone? Or am I just thinking of something totally different.
Actually, the original is in sepia colors. The television prints were in black and white. In effect, it was the opposite of colorization, turning the (limited) color of the opening a closing scenes to black and white. Luckily, they have been restored in the DVD releases.

-Lon
User avatar
BelleGirl
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1174
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:36 am
Location: The Netherlands, The Hague

Post by BelleGirl »

You are discussing the colorizing of life-action features, but how would you feel about colorizing old black-and-white Dinsey cartoons, like "Skeletton Dance" and "Steamboat Willy" (assuming it's possible)? Would it add something to these shorts or just distract from them?
User avatar
slave2moonlight
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4427
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: TX
Contact:

Post by slave2moonlight »

BelleGirl wrote:You are discussing the colorizing of life-action features, but how would you feel about colorizing old black-and-white Dinsey cartoons, like "Skeletton Dance" and "Steamboat Willy" (assuming it's possible)? Would it add something to these shorts or just distract from them?
I've seen colorized ones. They showed some on the Disney Channel sometimes. Looked awful.
User avatar
Escapay
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 12562
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Somewhere in Time and Space
Contact:

Post by Escapay »

The colourised version of "Ye Olden Days" is on the Gold Classic Collection DVD of Robin Hood (the Most Wanted Edition has it in original b/w) and a colourised "Mickey's Good Deed" is on Classic Cartoon Favorites: Volume 8 - Holiday Celebration with Mickey & Pals.

"Ye Olden Days" is up on youtube (at least until Disney takes it down, and given that they read our forums...), you can watch it here

albert
WIST #60:
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion? :p

WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
User avatar
drfsupercenter
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1279
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:59 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Post by drfsupercenter »

LOL, Disney reads our forums?

So in regards to that I'll say: "You all are a bunch of morons when it comes to releasing your movies... Why can't you present them both in the original negative ration and original theatrical ratio?!"

I'm done ranting.

As far as colorized stuff goes, I actually like watching colorized things... like I said, as long as the black and white is still around. Now, if they tried to REPLACE the old classics with colorized versions, then I'd have a problem... much like I do with what Lucas is doing to Star Wars (Or what Disney did to The Lion King, really)
Image

Howard Ashman:
He gave a mermaid her voice, a beast his soul, and Arabs something to complain about
Arabian Nights (Unedited)
Savages (Uncensored)
If it ain't OTV, it ain't worth anything!
User avatar
Elladorine
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
Contact:

Post by Elladorine »

I dunno, I grew up on the colorized version of The Absent-Minded Professor not knowing it was supposed to be in black and white. :lol: I actually prefer the black and white version now but don't mind the colorized one so much.

I actually just picked up the latest DVD of It's a Wonderful Life out of curiosity for the colorized version (plus it was only like $1.50), but have yet to check it out.
Image
Heil Donald Duck
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 447
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 1:13 pm
Location: ICELAND

Post by Heil Donald Duck »

fraud, in my point of view. I say this as that is editing of orginal productied content. As I like to get the most correct original version. But if they were shot at the same time in color I would be o.k with that.
Der Fuehrer's Face is the greatest Donald Duck cartoon ever made.
User avatar
KubrickFan
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1209
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:22 am

Post by KubrickFan »

It looks horrible, especially the early colorizations. With new computer techniques they managed to improve it, but skin tones still look off. And it's not the way it's supposed to look, so that would be another reason to avoid them. I remember being surprised to find out The Longest Day was in black and white, because it was always broadcast in color. But it looks far superior in B/W.
Image
User avatar
drfsupercenter
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1279
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:59 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Post by drfsupercenter »

Hmm, speaking of Oz... I have this VHS that says "black and white/Color" on it... I compared it to the DVD.

The DVD is actual sepia, the VHS is black and white. For the beginning and end. So what the heck? Do I have the "TV broadcast version"?
Image

Howard Ashman:
He gave a mermaid her voice, a beast his soul, and Arabs something to complain about
Arabian Nights (Unedited)
Savages (Uncensored)
If it ain't OTV, it ain't worth anything!
User avatar
Elladorine
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
Contact:

Post by Elladorine »

drfsupercenter wrote:Hmm, speaking of Oz... I have this VHS that says "black and white/Color" on it... I compared it to the DVD.

The DVD is actual sepia, the VHS is black and white. For the beginning and end. So what the heck? Do I have the "TV broadcast version"?
Apparently all prints from 1949 through 1988 have the Kansas scenes shown in B&W, not the original sepia. The sepia was restored in the 50th anniversary video.
Image
Post Reply