David's Signature...............

MickeyMouseboy · Post by **MickeyMouseboy** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 5:39 am

I dont think David should have that pic in his Signature in this forum. It's inappropiate in a Disney Forum.

This should be a clean Forum since we have member that are not legal adults.

Tangela · Post by **Tangela** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 6:55 am

MickeyMouseboy wrote: I dont think Tangela should have that pic in his Signature in this forum. It's inappropiate in a Disney Forum. This should be a clean Forum since we have member that are not legal adults.

What on Earth are you talking about?

MickeyMouseboy · Post by **MickeyMouseboy** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 7:32 am

Tangela wrote:What on Earth are you talking about?

About David's Signature Pic, Haven't you seen it?

karlsen · Post by **karlsen** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 7:39 am

Its a big comersial for the DareDevil movie.

Another thing is that it is so darn big that the pages takes ages to load if there is a few of his posts in it.

MickeyMouseboy · Post by **MickeyMouseboy** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 7:43 am

still this is a Disney board not a 20th Century Fox board and that pic looks like a porn pic.

wizzer · Post by **wizzer** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 7:45 am

i think its a picture of some daytime soap opera star. and shes pretty hot and i think its fine for anyone to look at. as for reducing the size, that's enough of this nickel and dime bandwidth savings s#!t--i'm going to get the address to donate some cash. if those pics get to you you better stay away from the bra adds in your local paper.

karlsen · Post by **karlsen** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 7:46 am

I do not agree that it looks like a Porn pic (its just a promotional picture from the movie), but I do agree that it has nothing with this forum to do at all.

Maybee you should just send David a PM message about it? It might turn out pritty nice that way.

wizzer · Post by **wizzer** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 7:50 am

who said your signature has to be disney related?

wizzer · Post by **wizzer** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 7:51 am

david---don't touch your sig. i like it.

MickeyMouseboy · Post by **MickeyMouseboy** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 7:51 am

well i just dont think it's appropiate for the forum. Think about X member and he's 15 and his mom knows he's coming here and she decides to take a look at this son and she sees that pic what will happned to X member? well you know.

wizzer · Post by **wizzer** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 7:52 am

i don't understand whats wrong with the picture. did your mom say something?

MickeyMouseboy · Post by **MickeyMouseboy** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 8:01 am

no, I just don't think that sig pic sends off the right image of this site when people read the forums.

Tangela · Post by **Tangela** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 8:02 am

MickeyMouseboy wrote:
Tangela wrote:What on Earth are you talking about?

About David's Signature Pic, Haven't you seen it?

Yes, I've seen David's signature and I told him about it, I found it pretty offensive, my confusion was because this thread originally had my name on it.

MickeyMouseboy · Post by **MickeyMouseboy** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 8:06 am

It did? I dont think so

wizzer · Post by **wizzer** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 8:11 am

i think that most people understand that what's in your signature is your own personal signature space and reflects your own personality. in this case, david is a fan of what i believe to be an actress, probably one he personaly likes alot and wants other people to check out her site. i looked and it's seems to be non-pornographic even if you put it up to american mpaa standards. i think you're being a bit prude in this case and i could find a scene from a disney movie somewhere that would show more than ample amounts of bust to compare with the said pic.

Tangela · Post by **Tangela** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 8:12 am

MickeyMouseboy wrote:It did? I dont think so

Funny!

MickeyMouseboy · Post by **MickeyMouseboy** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 8:15 am

wizzer wrote:i think that most people understand that what's in your signature is your own personal signature space and reflects your own personality. in this case, david is a fan of what i believe to be an actress, probably one he personaly likes alot and wants other people to check out her site. i looked and it's seems to be non-pornographic even if you put it up to american mpaa standards. i think you're being a bit prude in this case and i could find a scene from a disney movie somewhere that would show more than ample amounts of bust to compare with the said pic.

well when i see that pic and can tell from his personality that he prob like big breast, has his room full of playboy bunnies, have 3 gf but they don't he dating all 3, has a closet full of porn.

wizzer · Post by **wizzer** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 8:22 am

MickeyMouseboy wrote:
well when i see that pic and can tell from his personality that he prob like big breast, has his room full of playboy bunnies, have 3 gf but they don't he dating all 3, has a closet full of porn.

what the...... HAHAHAHAHAHA

Bill W · Post by **Bill W** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 8:24 am

Not that anybody asked my opinion, but I agree with Mickymouseboy... that picture in his signature is inappropriate for a Disney DVD forum. If we want to see pictures of scantily-clad women, there's millions of places to go on the Internet. Why do we need to see it here?

wizzer · Post by **wizzer** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 8:39 am

I guess you don't have to see that sort of thing but i'm just trying to stand up for what could and could not be considered appropriate. i see nothing wrong with the pic. you can see her midriff and her bust. and if you click on the link all the other pics of her are almost all of her face. shes a soap opera actress. it's more innocent than baywatch. do i nedd to start digging for disney images that show midriff and bust? and i won't just go straight to the jessica rabbit either

i am a father and i told my 5 year old to look at the picture and she said it looks like mommy when she works out.

DVDizzy Forum

Latest Movie Reviews

🎬 DVDizzy Top Stories️️

David's Signature...............

David's Signature...............