If you could delete/redo any of the sequels

TheValentineBros · Post by **TheValentineBros** » Sun Jul 15, 2012 7:04 am

Super Aurora wrote:Make the sequels better than the originals, Just to seeing the bawwing, the rage, and butthurt release from the UD members here.

Just joking, I love your style of trolling.

Disney Duster · Post by **Disney Duster** » Sun Jul 15, 2012 8:19 pm

Marce82 wrote:I think the first rule should be that if the makers of the original are dead, THEY SHOULD NOT MAKE A SEQUEL TO THEIR FILM. They arent here to give their input. (except Fantasia, which is a whole different story!)

I agree!

Marce82 wrote:And I agree about it not right turning Lady tremaine into a would-be sorceress.

Wonderlicious wrote:Having the stepmother delve into black magic is just so out of character (she's supposed to be a domestic villain as opposed to an all-powerful sorceress!)

I think it's okay when a character changes because she comes into a new situation, like Cinderella herself also did. As well as the Prince (though he could have been heroic without forgoing his soft voice and personality). I get your other problems with the film (though I want to say I like how in Cinderella III, because they aren't quite as good as the original artists, it looks like they took more time to try and make everything as detailed, lush, and big as possible, which the original didn't need to do but it one thing I wish the original had).

tsom wrote:Eliminate "Cinderella II" and make "Cinderella III" "Cinderella II."

Or just Cinderella: A Twist in Time?

Atlantica · Post by **Atlantica** » Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:37 am

I think that if the original filmmakers are around, they should be involved. Or at least want to be involved with concept of the film and story.

And out of all the Princesses, why the heck they made Ariel have a child goes beyond me completely. Cinderella was 100% the most obvious choice.

Just make them ALL better movies in all honesty.

REINIER · Post by **REINIER** » Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:49 pm

I would recreate the animation on Return of Jafar & Lion king 2..bring back all orginal artists & musicians.. Except sadly for Howard Ashman .. I would have made a far superior sequal to TLM involving Ursula's time in the palace and how she got banished.... That's just me rambling here

Alphapanchito · Post by **Alphapanchito** » Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:20 pm

I think I am alone in this, but one I wouldn't change is Return to Neverland. I just have this sweet spot for Jane. She's kind of adorable. I think the movie actually has heart, and I think it deserves a little more attention than it gets. And I'll Try is a cute little song.

I'm to tired to listen.
I'm too old to believe:
All these childish stories.
There is no such thing as faith,
And trust,
And pixie dust.

I think the animation was done pretty well too. We get to see Wendy's neighborhood during the war, and a lot of really cool new places in Neverland. I really think they tried in this one. It gets corny at times. But i'm a fan of corn.

But I wouldn't mind deleting everything else, except possibly little mermaid III (its not horrible), the Aladdin ones, and A Twist in Time.

edit: And delete Tarzan 2. A lot. No more Zugor.

FigmentJedi · Post by **FigmentJedi** » Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:19 pm

Launch Hunchback of Notre Dame 2 into the damn sun.

DisneyDude2010 · Post by **DisneyDude2010** » Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:26 pm

Yes PP 2 also did fairly decent at the box office

FigmentJedi wrote:Launch Hunchback of Notre Dame 2 into the damn sun.

1000000000000% agree!

Atlantica · Post by **Atlantica** » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:18 pm

How come from a company that they can get stuff SO right, they can get stuff so darn WRONG ?!

jazzflower92 · Post by **jazzflower92** » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:23 pm

atlanticaunderthesea wrote:How come from a company that they can get stuff SO right, they can get stuff so darn WRONG ?!

Because they made cheaquals that are made to sell the lowest common denominator instead of the whole family could enjoy.

I still think that Lion King 2 and the Aladdin sequels were actually trying to be good.

While the rest were obvious catch ins that really had cliched stories and often made little to no sense.

Old Fish Tale · Post by **Old Fish Tale** » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:50 pm

Well, I thought 'The Lion King 1 1½', 'Bambi and the Great Prince of the Forest', 'Tinker Bell', 'Tinker Bell and the Lost Treasure', 'Tinker Bell and the Great Fairy Rescue' and 'Tinker Bell and the Pixie Hollow Games' were really good! I can't wait to 'Tinker Bell and the Secret of the Wings' and I've heard some 'Winnie, the Pooh' sequels are worth watching...

jazzflower92 · Post by **jazzflower92** » Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:10 pm

Old Fish Tale wrote:Well, I thought 'The Lion King 1 1½', 'Bambi and the Great Prince of the Forest', 'Tinker Bell', 'Tinker Bell and the Lost Treasure', 'Tinker Bell and the Great Fairy Rescue' and 'Tinker Bell and the Pixie Hollow Games' were really good! I can't wait to 'Tinker Bell and the Secret of the Wings' and I've heard some 'Winnie, the Pooh' sequels are worth watching...

I epsically liked the Winnie the Pooh sequels which I think were the sequels that really did their orginal justice.I espically did like Pooh's Grand Adventure The Searth For Christopher Robin.Man,do I remember that movie it was really good in my opinion.Yeah,I think I would keep the Tinker Bell movies and Winnie the Pooh movies as well.

reyquila · Post by **reyquila** » Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:27 pm

None!!! Bring them all in Blu Ray!!!

DVDizzy Forum

Latest Movie Reviews

🎬 DVDizzy Top Stories️️

If you could delete/redo any of the sequels