DVDizzy Forum

Yeah the sequels are unneccessary, but you know what, they exist and they are what they are. They were concieved as cash-ins (like much of 90s animation and the current CG boom) and why not. I know it's a lot more satisfying to see creator-driven projects, but sometimes you have to take what you can...

The look in these newer stills is much better than the earlier two. I concur with the opinions about young Tarzan being less interesting. Looks like it will bore me as a filmgoer, but possibly entertain me as an animation enthusiast. I can't help but think that there would be more animation-value in...

They have some great talent down in the Sydney studio, but I really hate that rim lighting they use all the time. Looks cheap.