Page 1 of 2
Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 10:05 am
by Choco Bear
wats up with this the movie hanst even come out in theaters yet

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 10:16 am
by Sulley
That's weird. It has the Disney DVD logo. I don't think the Spy Kids films usually have any Disney banner on them.
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 10:18 am
by Luke
Disney's site lists the Pre-Book date in January 2004, which would indicate a March 2004 release. Quite odd that it's not even out in theaters yet. And it's a Miramax film, nonetheless.
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 11:08 am
by MickeyMouseboy
that would proof the truth of the news about studios making the DVD before the movie comes out but this is just way too soon

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 7:11 pm
by Loomis
Dear lord...
I haven't even seen the second one yet!
Robert Rodriguez is doing this one as well, so I guess I'll have to give it a whirl at some point.
Looking more forward to Once Upon A Time in Mexico, though
Oh, and BTW, Luke - you are Alf! How cool is that?

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 7:16 pm
by Luke
Loomis wrote:Oh, and BTW, Luke - you are Alf! How cool is that?

Very?

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 11:10 pm
by MickeyMouseboy
is better than that mean hopper icon! i was scared of luke's post! dictator luke! hehehe that's what the icon looked like!

Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2003 9:09 pm
by disneyfella
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2003 9:53 pm
by Luke
Yes, Rocky VI and Rambo 4...what a loser.

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 1:13 am
by MickeyMouseboy
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 3:36 am
by Loomis
And is that Ricardo Montalban tucked away in the bottom right corner?
Christ - what are they keeping him propped up with?
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 1:08 pm
by Maerj
Well, he is an Academy Award nominated actor/writer who makes $20 million a movie, so if that is being a loser, I want in on some of that loss!
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 1:43 pm
by MickeyMouseboy
Maerj wrote:
Well, he is an Academy Award nominated actor/writer who makes $20 million a movie, so if that is being a loser, I want in on some of that loss!
Amen to that Terry!
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 2:24 pm
by Luke
Salary
D-Tox (2002) $17,500,000
D-Tox (2002) Gross:
$79,161 (USA)
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 2:27 pm
by MickeyMouseboy
Luke wrote:Salary
D-Tox (2002) $17,500,000
D-Tox (2002) Gross:
$79,161 (USA)
oh really?!!! that's a big drop lol ::takes amen back::

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 3:13 pm
by Maerj
He still made a ton of dough off of that movie and everyone has unprofitable movies at times. It doesn't change the fact that he was in many successful films and became an American icon. I'm no huge Stallone fan or anything, in fact the only movie of his I bought on DVD was Demolition Man. I'm just saying that the guy was successful at what he set out to do and that is to make movies. He has had recognition from his peers, made a boatload of money and continues doing what he likes, despite the occasional setback.
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 4:20 pm
by Luke
Maerj wrote:He still made a ton of dough off of that movie and everyone has unprofitable movies at times. It doesn't change the fact that he was in many successful films and became an American icon. I'm no huge Stallone fan or anything, in fact the only movie of his I bought on DVD was Demolition Man. I'm just saying that the guy was successful at what he set out to do and that is to make movies. He has had recognition from his peers, made a boatload of money and continues doing what he likes, despite the occasional setback.
I don't hate the guy or anything, but it just seems to me that he's forced to write unnecessary sequels to his films as the only things that he'll get to make that actually wind up in theaters. It's rough to start from the top with writing and starring in a Best Picture and then falling to direct-to-video projects and annual Razzie nominations.
In terms of successful films, well no doubt, he's had some big moneymakers, but I can think of only one film of his from the past 20 years that I've liked.
I fear the two sequels he's supposedly writing. Each Rocky sequel has gotten notably worse, and V was just...
In any event, I guess this gives some reasoning behind my feelings about him, although maybe the "loser" thing was a little harsh. But it does feel like he's lost a lot since "Rocky."
Spy Kids 3
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2003 11:48 am
by MickeyMousePal
Here's the art work of the Spy Kids 3-D - Game Over it comes out on February 24, 2004. It's from Buena Vista Home Video so I thought of showing it.

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2003 2:22 pm
by poco
My question concerning this movie deals with the 3-D glasses. Since several people (especially kids) watch this movie at the same time, are they going to have more than 1 pair of glasses to watch the film?
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:15 pm
by MickeyMousePal
Yes contains 3-D glasses.
Contains 3-D and 2-D versions of the film
4 pairs of 3-D glasses included
Widescreen anamorphic format