I didn't want to get drawn into this (it's a question that's been posted before), because I consider it one of those discussions ripe with B.S. and with too much potential to lead to webboard arguments that are tedious, neverending, and pointless (as the people who get stirred up are naturally the ones very set in their opinion). Still, I'll state my piece and try not to revisit the subject...
jessiaaaa1991 wrote:
My question is:
How are the female characters in disney films represented?
I'll agree with what has been said that this is something that could not be addressed in detail without being more specific about which character(s) you are asking about. Generalizing is hardly fair, though I will say that overall I don't feel they have been portrayed negatively at all. They are thankfully different enough that they are not going to please everyone as a group and people have their favorites and complaints about others. The problem is hardly with the portrayal of the Disney females and more with the fact that some people only want to see women portrayed one way. Such people are not really calling for "realistic" female portrayals, as they may personally believe, but rather an ideal they have developed. If they are lucky (or if Disney is lucky?) they will find one Disney girl who matches that ideal, but then they seem to want all the others to be that way.
Of course, with Disney the popular complaint is that Disney girls are all damsels in distress, and because this prevalence in earlier Disney films has formed a grudge for more feminist minded women, they start trying to find the flaws in the less "damsel in distress" type Disney girls. Here comes the b.s. Belle is submissive, Ariel expects nothing from her man, etc... These major character assumptions are derived from only an hour and a half of getting to know the characters and without any really strong evidence. After all, Belle refused Gaston in part due to his obvious desire for a submissive wife and apparently saw something more in the Beast. The idea from the film is that some people could change with proper guidance and love, though not all. Belle apparently was smart enough to tell the difference (something that is unusual in real life, but not completely impossible; consider how some gang members can become VERY reformed, but of course only SOME). One can argue about depicting women who go for guys who need reforming over nice guys who don't, but the fact is that it reflects real life very well, sadly. Feminists seem to want all female characters to be depicted as flawless, especially since most folks unfairly see Disney films as only for kids, but flawless characters are less believable, and hopefully at least everyone here knows Disney animated features are not intended solely for small children.
But to get to something that really gripes me... the point often made in defending Disney films that depict the female as the damsel in distress is that this is mostly seen in the older films and that is how most movies/stories of the time were. This is a good argument, but I'd like to add to that. These are also Fairytales, not to mention period stories. One thing I, personally, find very annoying is when period films (especially live-action, by the way) depict women who act more like they are from modern day Los Angeles than ye olden days. I don't remember which period film I saw recently where the girls giggled and laughed about one man because he had a beard, meanwhile, most guys of the time did. They are also always trying to push the modern distaste for age-differences in relationships in newly-made period flicks, or showing teenage mothers hundreds of years ago to be as helpless and tragic as teenage mothers are viewed today. It's just not realistic. It's the same thing with the damsel in distress issue. It would hardly be realistic to never show women in period films, particularly fairytales, as the damsels in distress. Imagine if every female in every period film acted like Xena: Warrior Princess? It's just b.s. Not every character should have to be Mulan, and that approach would get so old so fast. Anyway, calling all Disney princesses helpless damsels is b.s. too. What you have in something like Snow White, for example, is NOT an always helpless damsel in distress. Here is a young woman who, when cast out by a woman in high power, found a place to stay and paid her way (through working) completely on her own before she fell victim to the Queen's plot. Yes, a prince kisses her, but it is not he who revives her but a kiss of true love (the same with Sleeping Beauty). And anyway, what is Disney supposed to do, change the ending to a well-known, classic fairytale?
You also have this whole problem that if the female is always saving the day, as some people would like, then the male never is. Reversing things doesn't make them any better than they were before. On the topic of Megara, the movie is called Hercules, not Megara, so you really have to have him save the day and the girl. Even in modern films, this should be okay sometimes. The fact that Meg decided that she didn't need a man shouldn't make it a bad thing that she fell in love with one. After all, that was why she was in the story. The love interest.
jessiaaaa1991 wrote:Do you think that females are represented positively or negatively in Disney films?
See above...
jessiaaaa1991 wrote:Do you think that characters costumes are acceptable or in some cases too revealing?
Can't see why this would be an issue. Only one that I'd think comes close to revealing is Ariel's seashell costume, but she IS a mermaid. Sex appeal was a big part of that movie though (just read Disney's Encyclopedia of Animated Characters, I believe that's where I read it), just further proving that filmmakers don't make animated features for the kid audience exclusively. And I've been in love with Ariel ever since (her and Tink, also not a damsel in distress).
jessiaaaa1991 wrote:Do you think that women are represented as equal to men?
This depends on what you view as equal. I think this is often misviewed. Equal does not have to mean "The Same". Men and women are different, and that's a reality. You can be equal and different, though again, to answer this question would have to be thought out on a case by case basis. It's easy to say Mulan and Kim Possible are, but to make every single story about a female warrior or secret agent would be a little ridiculous. And, again, you have periods to consider, both the period the film is set in and the period it was made in. You have the caste system, etc... Take Cinderella. She is not royalty, so in that way she's not equal to her prince, but there really is nothing to indicate that she isn't equal to him in other ways. He was assertive, yes, in insisting to marry who he wanted, but she too was assertive in defying her stepmother and going to the ball. There is a film that makes me roll my eyes when anyone says Cinderella is another weak female character.
jessiaaaa1991 wrote:Do you think that young girls will think that they will always "live happily ever after" because of the influence of Disney films?
I think Disney films push the idea that we CAN live happily ever after, that it's a possibility. They push optimism, that's all. You can push optimism or you can push pecimism. I might be willing to fault them on pushing the idea of true love at first sight, but that whole subject is a very individual and personal one for everyone who contemplates it, it is directed at both males and females in films, and Disney isn't the only one at fault there. Again, they are producing fairytales and fairytale-type stories mostly, so...
jessiaaaa1991 wrote:Do you think that as time has passed, Disney films have adapted to fit into their era?
Yes. I wouldn't say that is always a good thing, but they definitely have.