The Secret of NIMH and The Black Cauldron
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 4:04 pm
Before Don Bluth made The Scret of Nimh himself, he had suggested this movie to Disney when he worked there, but they tought it was too dark to be made into an animated feature.
But the first movie Disney released after Bluth had released Nimh, was The Black Cauldron, one of the darkest movies Disney have made. So why did they change their mind? Was it just a coincidence, or was it because of what they saw Bluth's results?
I know The Black Cauldron had been in pre-production for many years, but could it be that Nimh caused them to make it a little darker, or would it happened anyway? It says the movie was five years in actual production, and was released in 1985, while Nimh was released in 1982. But Bluth had in early 1980 showed some footage of the movie, the sequence where Mrs. Brisby visits the Great Owl.
I'm asking because I have heard there were rumors back then that there was a risk that the Disney studio might was about to close their doors. And then suddenly they makes a very expensive and dark movie. If that's not the reason, why did they put so much resources into the film? Because it was number 25 in the canon perhaps? One can't deny that the movie was special in many ways; 70mm, ATP-process, first use of CGI in the canon, the return of the multiplane camera and PG rating, and was not a typical Disney feature. Which of course makes me curious what we have in wait for movie number 50 in the canon, which can't be many years away (2011 maybe?).
Also, "Shortly before the film's release to theaters, newly appointed Disney chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg ordered several scenes from The Black Cauldron be cut, due to the fear that the graphic nature of them would alienate children and family audiences."
Is there any hope that there will ever be released a director's cut?
But the first movie Disney released after Bluth had released Nimh, was The Black Cauldron, one of the darkest movies Disney have made. So why did they change their mind? Was it just a coincidence, or was it because of what they saw Bluth's results?
I know The Black Cauldron had been in pre-production for many years, but could it be that Nimh caused them to make it a little darker, or would it happened anyway? It says the movie was five years in actual production, and was released in 1985, while Nimh was released in 1982. But Bluth had in early 1980 showed some footage of the movie, the sequence where Mrs. Brisby visits the Great Owl.
I'm asking because I have heard there were rumors back then that there was a risk that the Disney studio might was about to close their doors. And then suddenly they makes a very expensive and dark movie. If that's not the reason, why did they put so much resources into the film? Because it was number 25 in the canon perhaps? One can't deny that the movie was special in many ways; 70mm, ATP-process, first use of CGI in the canon, the return of the multiplane camera and PG rating, and was not a typical Disney feature. Which of course makes me curious what we have in wait for movie number 50 in the canon, which can't be many years away (2011 maybe?).
Also, "Shortly before the film's release to theaters, newly appointed Disney chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg ordered several scenes from The Black Cauldron be cut, due to the fear that the graphic nature of them would alienate children and family audiences."
Is there any hope that there will ever be released a director's cut?