Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:34 pm
Hold on,I just thought of something,where's Eric?
(I"m trying to avoid spoilers so I didn't checked).

Disney, DVD, and Beyond Forums
https://dvdizzy.com/forum/
Still, the illustrations (or, stills) look amazing and even if the plot does suck, I already know the animation will be a million times better than TLM2.Disney Villain wrote:Here are the Scans from the picture book, enjoy! Be warned- the text is in tact, so don't read if you don't want spoilers. This book reveals everything that the coloring book had stated. It's nothing exciting.
http://picasaweb.google.com/disneyvault ... SBeginning
You are very welcome! You have a point- if Disney came out and said "Marina is Ursula or Morgana" then the action in the film would be much less exciting because the audience would be able to guess the rest of the plot.Nymbus wrote:Thank you Disney Villain for the summary and everyone else for the pics! I can't wait for the movie!
And, just my theory: I don't think Disney would want to immediately state in the book that Marina is Ursula or Morgana, it's not something that they would do in a kids book I don't think since they wouldn't want to give away spoilers.
Same thing happened with Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End kid's books where they told the main plotline but they didn't include what happened to Will or anyone else. Anyway, just a few more thoughts from me!
I agree with you- the coloring book pages have more life to them, then the full color images; we are able to see all the details. I also HATE the shadowing effect on this film. It looks like a big gray blob that has been placed over everything.disneystarsfan wrote:what's interesting about the scans that beckalovesariel posted is that Ariel actually looks better than how she does in AB. In that coloring book you can see the lines for instance in her hair that makes her seem more realistic and natural instead looking a little gooey(for lack of a better word) like she does in the movie.
I do agree that Cinderella III: A Twist In Time did add to character development, but besides that, in my opinion, it did not add to the Cinderella story. I also see your point about consulting the original filmmakers, and I agree John Musker and Ron Clements probably had no clue this film was in production. Here is my point of view when it comes to Disney films: When I watch a Disney film like The Little Mermaid and then watch sequels I treat them as if they’re real and weren’t created by filmmakers and film crews. In that regard, when I first heard of Ariel’s Beginning and then later on saw the sneak preview I tried to connect all three Ariel films as if they all were real and all fit into each other. I started to think of things like Sebastian’s facial expressions in The Little Mermaid II when he saw Morgana for the first time- and how it could be that Marina is actually Morgana in disguise, and Sebastian freaked out in the second movie because of the past he and Marina had. I’m trying hard to explain my mindset, I hope I haven’t confused anyone.Disney Duster wrote:By the way Disney Villain, Cinderella III still "adds" to Cinderella because it expands on the Prince, and Anastasia, and even Cinderella herself. It even furthers Cinderella and the Prince's love for each other, and shows how evil Lady Tremaine and Drizella can get, even turning against Anastasia. But the thing is, that's not for sure how the characters really were meant to be...and neither might the explanations and expansions in Ariel's Beginning. We can hope they talked to the original makers of the film, like John Musker and Ron Clements who wrote and directed it, and asked them either what the backstory is or asked them if they agreed to the backstory they came up with, but it's doubtful. Many people within Disney don't even know the sequels are made or what's in the sequels. Maybe they ignore them...and maybe we should follow...
You are very, very welcome! I agree this film does seem to have some great animation. I am still puzzled as to why Kenneth Mars is not King Triton in this film. He has done every incarnation of King Triton for Disney- from things like toys to Princess CD's. He even guest starred in an episode of Hannah Montana. I could of swore it was him in the The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning trailer as well.Old Fish Tale wrote:Thanks, Disney Villain! You rock! The animation looks nice!
So Triton sings! Maybe that's why Jim Cummings voiced him this time!
Poor Benjamin! Locked away in the dugeon!
Thank you for the kind’s words! I wanted a sig that included both the princesses and the villains, so I decided to put emphasis on the princesses but leave the villains always watching in the background. I tried to get similar clip art of the villains all making, more or less, the same facial expression. Thank you again for the kind comment!!pap64 wrote:Off topic, but Disney Villain I really like your sig. I like how it emphasizes on the Disney Princesses, yet the villains have a presence. I like that type of subtlety.
It's not her!gumby17 wrote:ooo i like the shot of ariel jumping out of the water and its almost like a siloette (sp?)!!!!!!!!!!
uuhh haha ya sure?? cuz i really think it is! hahaOld Fish Tale wrote:Magnificent! Thanks, Disney Villain! You're the best! I love the first one!
It's not her!gumby17 wrote:ooo i like the shot of ariel jumping out of the water and its almost like a siloette (sp?)!!!!!!!!!!
That was my prediction from the start! At least I was right about something. lolOld Fish Tale wrote:So Triton sings! Maybe that's why Jim Cummings voiced him this time!