Re: Jungle Book 2 - a Classic?
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2003 4:40 pm
Just you.Jack wrote:Is it just me, or does anyone else find Sher Khan more menacing with his chin cut-off?
No, just kidding. No, just kidding.Page 2 of 2
No, just kidding.Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:54 pm
I cannot stand the JB2! I really think this movie was not necessary at all! Just like most of the sequels out today! 
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:58 pm
It was necessary!Matt wrote:I cannot stand the JB2! I really think this movie was not necessary at all! Just like most of the sequels out today!
Just BAREly NECESSARY.
Ok, that was so bad I'm going to go into self-exile for the next half a minute...
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2003 8:41 pm
Even the best are dry at times!Loomis wrote:It was necessary!Matt wrote:I cannot stand the JB2! I really think this movie was not necessary at all! Just like most of the sequels out today!
Just BAREly NECEESARY.
Ok, that was so bad I'm going to go into self-exile for the next half a minute...
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2003 10:11 am
NO WAY ! This cheap one can't be part of the Disney Classics.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2003 11:00 am
It isn't in America, just outside America. Oh well! Just think how annoying it'll be to have CG movies part of the classics. Speaking of which, does that make Dinosaur a classic?MagicMouse wrote:NO WAY ! This cheap one can't be part of the Disney Classics.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2003 11:18 am
It's not a 'true' classic.
All the UK animated classics are numbered on the back of the sleeve, with Treasure Planet being the 42nd, Jungle Book 2 isn't labeled as the 43rd, so as a collector of all the animated classics, I can safely pass on this one, and hope that 'Brother Bear' will be the 43rd.
By the way great site
, shame I haven't found this before! 
All the UK animated classics are numbered on the back of the sleeve, with Treasure Planet being the 42nd, Jungle Book 2 isn't labeled as the 43rd, so as a collector of all the animated classics, I can safely pass on this one, and hope that 'Brother Bear' will be the 43rd.
By the way great site
, shame I haven't found this before! Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 5:47 am
n.
An artist, author, or work generally considered to be of the highest rank or excellence, especially one of enduring significance.
A work recognized as definitive in its field.
A literary work of ancient Greece or Rome.
classics The languages and literature of ancient Greece and Rome. Used with the.
One that is of the highest rank or class: The car was a classic of automotive design.
A typical or traditional example.
Informal. A superior or unusual example of its kind: The reason he gave for being late was a classic.
A traditional event, especially a major sporting event that is held annually: a golf classic.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 9:36 am
Thanks 2099net for the definition! 
I think the same way i did before, they need to burn all the prints, artwork, demos, dvd of every Sequel ever made! except Lion king 2!
I think the same way i did before, they need to burn all the prints, artwork, demos, dvd of every Sequel ever made! except Lion king 2! Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 10:36 am
The only description from the definition above which may fit is
"A typical or traditional example."
especially as it's haddrawn, and all new Disney is to be CGI
"A typical or traditional example."
especially as it's haddrawn, and all new Disney is to be CGI
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 10:38 am
true 2099net. but they will soon realize that CGI will not make them money cause i won't be paying to see them in theaters!
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 7:03 pm
Thanks for the compliment and welcome to the forum!Mr Burns wrote:By the way great site
I've given you an avatar to fit your name. Of course, you're free to change it, but I just thought it'd be better than nothing.
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:40 pm
And thank you for adding the picture........ excelllllent
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2003 4:24 am
Wait a sec! what about Return of Jafar and The Rescuers Down Under?MickeyMouseboy wrote:Thanks 2099net for the definition! I think the same way i did before, they need to burn all the prints, artwork, demos, dvd of every Sequel ever made! except Lion king 2!
You cant burn those!
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2003 1:11 pm
I think he means all cheapquels, which of course would exclude Rescuers Down Under. And, Return of Jafar is utter manuire. I do plan on burning mine, thankyouverymuch.IggieKuzco wrote:Wait a sec! what about Return of Jafar and The Rescuers Down Under?MickeyMouseboy wrote:Thanks 2099net for the definition! I think the same way i did before, they need to burn all the prints, artwork, demos, dvd of every Sequel ever made! except Lion king 2!
You cant burn those!