Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:26 pm
It's mainly operating costs. Disney knows two things: (a) Where people go in the parks at what time of day, and (b) How much it costs to operate each attraction.
In the case of Epcot, they know the World Showcase is almost like a different park, because of the way its positioned. Not enough people will head straight back to the WS when the park opens to justify paying all the CMs and operating the various attractions back there. Disney can save a lot of money by focusing on the majority of attendees, who will make their way around FutureWorld (which is expansive enough to accomodate even very large crowds) in the first 2 hours or so. By then, there are enough people ready to venture into WS to make it worth opening. Plus, it usually opens just a little before lunch time, and they want people dining at those $$ WS restaurants.
By the same logic, since FW is open for awhile w/o WS, most people wrap up with FW early, and the majority of the visitors would already be in WS by the time it closes. Sure, there's that group that would rather stay in FW all day, but it just doesn't justify the operating costs (with the exception of the few headliners which do remain open for all of Epcot's park hours).
The same goes for The Timekeeper. It's very expensive to operate, from what I've read- one of the pricier attractions in the Magic Kingdom. Most people head to Tomorrowland when the park opens (though a sizeable crowd heads for Frontierland, too). Let's face it, Timekeeper is popular, but it's not gonna be your first activity in the Magic Kingdom. Therefore, why not wait until everyone has had a go on the really popular stuff in TL, and then open it when they're ready. And over in Frontierland, people are finishing up the two mountains just in time for Adventureland next door to open one hour after the park.
Of course, during days of high attendance, everything is crowded all the time, so they open everything all the time. Overall, I think it's wise on Disney's part, but they occasionally give things unnecessary delayed openings/early closings.
Make sense?
-Aaron
In the case of Epcot, they know the World Showcase is almost like a different park, because of the way its positioned. Not enough people will head straight back to the WS when the park opens to justify paying all the CMs and operating the various attractions back there. Disney can save a lot of money by focusing on the majority of attendees, who will make their way around FutureWorld (which is expansive enough to accomodate even very large crowds) in the first 2 hours or so. By then, there are enough people ready to venture into WS to make it worth opening. Plus, it usually opens just a little before lunch time, and they want people dining at those $$ WS restaurants.
By the same logic, since FW is open for awhile w/o WS, most people wrap up with FW early, and the majority of the visitors would already be in WS by the time it closes. Sure, there's that group that would rather stay in FW all day, but it just doesn't justify the operating costs (with the exception of the few headliners which do remain open for all of Epcot's park hours).
The same goes for The Timekeeper. It's very expensive to operate, from what I've read- one of the pricier attractions in the Magic Kingdom. Most people head to Tomorrowland when the park opens (though a sizeable crowd heads for Frontierland, too). Let's face it, Timekeeper is popular, but it's not gonna be your first activity in the Magic Kingdom. Therefore, why not wait until everyone has had a go on the really popular stuff in TL, and then open it when they're ready. And over in Frontierland, people are finishing up the two mountains just in time for Adventureland next door to open one hour after the park.
Of course, during days of high attendance, everything is crowded all the time, so they open everything all the time. Overall, I think it's wise on Disney's part, but they occasionally give things unnecessary delayed openings/early closings.
Make sense?
-Aaron