Re: Who gets to decide what characters make it into merchand
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:30 pm
Steamboat Willie Pete is on the poster (behind Gaston). Why would you want Prince John/Sir Hiss removed?
Disney, DVD, and Beyond Forums
https://dvdizzy.com/forum/
Oh you're right. Even after you told me, it still took me a second to notice him.Disney's Divinity wrote:Steamboat Willie Pete is on the poster (behind Gaston). Why would you want Prince John/Sir Hiss removed?
I think Mooky wasn't referring to Joanna, but to the lizard that is on the balcony on the left of the image. He's one of Fat Cat's henchmen from Chip 'n Dale: Rescue Rangers.JeanGreyForever wrote:That explains why there are several villains I don't recognize because the Disney Afternoon era was before my time.Mooky wrote: Wow, that one is very interesting and quite unusual given the fact they included villains from TV shows as well. That would be unheard of nowadays (as would any villain group shot, I reckon).
A couple of questions though -- who is the green lizard with a pink hat between Madam Mim, Maleficent and Medusa, and where is Gaston? His name is on the side of the picture, but I can't find him for the life of me. The artist also could have put some body of water in the picture so Flotsam and Jetsam would not look out of place (Ursula too, I guess).
Strange, I thought I remember seeing Gaston somewhere at the top like the Beast but now I can't find him. As for the green lizard, that is Joana from Rescuers Down Under. McLeach is a little bit to the right of her. I'm not a fan of the movie (it's nothing like the original Rescuers which is one of my favs) so their presence does nothing for me.

They may be antagonistic at first in their respective films but they clearly aren't villains. The Cheshire Cat is also an odd choice.JeanGreyForever wrote:There are some odd choices here though as well like the Beast, the vultures from Jungle Book, and the crows from Dumbo.
Fully agreed. As a fan of classic Disney, I find it madding how the brand is being handled these days. Disney is so focused on acquisitions, they are neglecting their home grown IP's with a very thin exception (i.e. Princesses, Mickey Mouse, Winnie the Pooh, etc.).Prince Edward wrote:I continue to be amazed by how Disney themselves are neglecting many of their classic movies by not trying to keep them in the public eye and in people's minds...
Well, that's true, but they aren't usually considered villains (I think). And in Tim Burton's version the Cheshire Cat is one of Alice's friends.Disney's Divinity wrote:I'd say nearly every character in Alice in Wonderland is an antagonist, including the Cheshire Cat.
Disney actually used the Chesire Cat on their Disney Villain merchandise for a long time. I think they stopped when the Tim Burton movie came out, probably because he is clearly good in that film. Actually the Cheshire Cat is a generally morally ambiguous character in most adaptations I've seen as he can either be good, bad, or neutral.D82 wrote:Well, that's true, but they aren't usually considered villains (I think). And in Tim Burton's version the Cheshire Cat is one of Alice's friends.Disney's Divinity wrote:I'd say nearly every character in Alice in Wonderland is an antagonist, including the Cheshire Cat.
Interesting. I didn't know Disney used to have him included in the Villains franchise. For me, most of the characters of Disney's Alice in Wonderland are antagonistic in the sense that they don't help Alice, but quite the opposite. But I always attributed their behaviour to the fact that they were all mad and didn't think they were evil. But I can see why they can be viewed as villains too. Especially The Cheshire Cat, who is responsible for making Alice go to the trial, for example.JeanGreyForever wrote:Disney actually used the Chesire Cat on their Disney Villain merchandise for a long time. I think they stopped when the Tim Burton movie came out, probably because he is clearly good in that film. Actually the Cheshire Cat is a generally morally ambiguous character in most adaptations I've seen as he can either be good, bad, or neutral.