Page 1 of 1

LA Times - Animators retrain in 3D... or Die!

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2003 11:09 am
by 2099net
http://www.latimes.com/la-fi-animate27j ... 9849.story

A very sad article. :cry:
at the end of the article re:Shrek 2 wrote:"Look at that emotion on his face!" Romanillos said. "It's so expressive. Look at the lighting. It's amazing what you can do on the computer."
Weren't they doing that in Pinocchio in the 1940's :?

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2003 11:18 am
by Leonia
It makes me wonder how kids in 2037 will react to Snow White's 100th anniversary when animation movies are now in 3d...

Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 2:51 pm
by Tascar
It's indeed a sad article.

I hate this fetish that the industry has with the life-like look of things in 3D animated movies. If I wanted to watch something life-like, I'd watch CGI in live-action films like The Two Towers.

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
by Captain Hook
Ooh, that article is HORRIBLE. It just proves that DreamWorks is the WORST of them all. Pixar is good, but if it's their fault that traditional animation is out, that's bad!

Hopefully Disney will continue 2D/3D mix like Treasure Planet, but it sure doesn't look like they will...
:cry:

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 11:45 am
by Matty-Mouse
Actually after Disney release "Home On The Range" in 2004 it isn't really their last 2D animated film. They plan on releasing two animated movies in 2005, "Chicken Little" and another thats had so many title changed I cant remember whats its called at the moment. Anyways It star's Dolly Parton and has a mix of both 2D and 3D characters and backgrounds.

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 11:48 am
by 2099net
There's rumours that both of these films are now entirely CGI.

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 1:05 pm
by Captain Hook
I hope that they are partially in traditional... oh well