Page 1 of 1
Who Framed Roger Rabbit in 3-D Coming to Theaters?
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:01 pm
by danielshooley
Hi everyone,
As we both know, Who Framed Roger Rabbit will be making its Blu-Ray debut in time for the films 25th anniversary in 2013.
Wikipedia is reporting, additionally, that Disney announced after the 3-d Re-Release of The Lion King that Who Framed Roger Rabbit will be re-released in 3-D on November 22, 2013.
Knowing its reputation for false information, I HOPE its true, but I DOUBT it; any confirmation about this will be great in advance.
If the 3-d Re-Release of Roger Rabbit IS true, Count Me IN on Day ONE!!!
Danny
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:34 pm
by estefan
Disney hasn't announced it and it's on Wikipedia, so I'm betting some wishful fan has edited the page.
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:06 pm
by pap64
*Sigh
I hate to sound like a jerk, but when are people going to learn that Wikipedia is NEVER a good source of information?
If a 3D re-release is coming, Disney will announce it. Plain and simple.
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 3:14 pm
by thelittleursula
Yeah what the guys above have said. It's most likely been edited by a fan since anybody can manipulate that page.
It would be cool to see it in the Cinemas though.
pap64 wrote:
I hate to sound like a jerk.
You ARE a Jerk from what I've seen. When I vented about the lack of interest within Disney wanting to make more 2D movies you called my post " The most dumbest thing you have ever read " and when another newbie coming in being hopeful about something, you get all huffy that not everybody knows how Wiki works.
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:01 pm
by pap64
thelittleursula wrote:You ARE a Jerk from what I've seen. When I vented about the lack of interest within Disney wanting to make more 2D movies you called my post " The most dumbest thing you have ever read " and when another newbie coming in being hopeful about something, you get all huffy that not everybody knows how Wiki works.
Because wishing ill will towards a movie that was produced by talented, hard working people that are already under enough stress from both the expectations of the company and the fanboys that complain about their work isn't one of the dumbest things one will ever say. I get that you are somehow upset that Disney may be moving away, but spewing biased hatred towards any of their products will not make the problem go away. You don't have to like the movie if you don't care for it, but to condemn it is just beyond ridiculous.
And based on the other comments you have gotten from other people, I am certainly not the only one with the same mentality.
As for my post on this thread, I do apologize to the creator of this thread, since people do forget or do not know that Wikipedia pages can be changed to provide false information. So to daniel, I apologize.
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:04 pm
by ajmrowland
pap64 wrote:*Sigh
I hate to sound like a jerk, but when are people going to learn that Wikipedia is NEVER a good source of information?
If a 3D re-release is coming, Disney will announce it. Plain and simple.
Wikipedia at least has started cracking down on misinformation by requiring sources.
And I have to vouche for you not being a jerk.
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:14 am
by Luke
thelittleursula wrote:You ARE a Jerk from what I've seen. When I vented about the lack of interest within Disney wanting to make more 2D movies you called my post " The most dumbest thing you have ever read " and when another newbie coming in being hopeful about something, you get all huffy that not everybody knows how Wiki works.
One of the few rules we have here is no personal attacks against fellow forum members. Not only is this unnecessary, it's not even in the right thread.
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:31 am
by Disney Duster
In all fairness if pap said his post was one of the dumbest things he ever read isn't that an attack or against the rules too?
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:18 pm
by disneyboy20022
Disney Duster wrote:In all fairness if pap said his post was one of the dumbest things he ever read isn't that an attack or against the rules too?
Two wrongs does not make it right.
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:19 pm
by pap64
I'm well aware of what I said in the thread, and I apologize for that too
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:00 pm
by Mickeyfan1990
Found a link regarding on the 3-D release:
http://www.nme.com/filmandtv/news/who-f ... bob/288960
You find that reliable?

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:04 am
by thelittleursula
pap64 wrote:I'm well aware of what I said in the thread, and I apologize for that too
Okay I'm sorry as well....
Disney Duster wrote:In all fairness if pap said his post was one of the dumbest things he ever read isn't that an attack or against the rules too?
Well to be honest I did find it to be really offensive. I mean how would you feel if somebody you said was the dumbest thing you have ever read ? I feel like it was a huge personal attack.
But we've both said sorry now. So yeah.
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:40 pm
by Sotiris
Q: Would you consider doing 3-D post-conversion on any of your earlier films?
Robert Zemeckis: The only one is "Roger Rabbit," because you could really pull the animation out as a separate element. It would be very spectacular 3-D. As far as converting, the "Back to the Future" films... I don't see the point in that. But they did a test on "Roger" back in 2006, somewhere around then, and it looks really great.
Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/169815 ... quel.jhtml