Chapter 2 - "There's enough land here to hold ALL the ideas and plans we can possibly imagine"
DISCLAIMER - Chapters 2 and 3 contain some material which could be considered critical of Walt Disney World management (known as "Team Disney Orlando", or "TDO"), and by extension, WDW itself. It is not my intention to sway anyone to my point of view or to "ruin the magic" for anyone for whom reading such viewpoints could have that effect. Rather, I strive for complete honesty and truthfulness in my writing, especially regarding my own thoughts and feelings, and it is necessary for me to express these opinions in order to tell my own very personal story of my experience of the closure of Snow White's Adventures. For those who are easily offended by reading such viewpoints, and for whom doing so would risk "ruining the magic" for them, it is recommended that they consider not reading further. Also, please remember and respect that this thread is intended to be a long-form, blog-style essay, and not intended to be a debate thread. Comments are welcome, but for those who disagree, please do not start arguments or debates.
Chapter 2 - "There's enough land here to hold ALL the ideas and plans we can possibly imagine"
- "Here in Florida, we have something special we never enjoyed at
Disneyland - the blessing of size. There's enough land here
to hold ALL the ideas and plans we can possibly imagine"
- Walt Disney
By now, most serious or even casual WDW fans are familiar with Walt's famous quote and it's origin. As awesome as his original Magic Kingdom, Disneyland, was (and still is), it was landlocked and had limited room with which to grow.
To stop this from happening again, Walt purchased 27,400 acres when planning Walt Disney World. Now, space concerns would never be an issue again.
Or so he thought....
After Walt's passing, Walt Disney World opened in 1971 with its first theme park, the Magic Kingdom. Comparisons to Disneyland were inevitable as the park was CLEARLY an East Coast interpretation of Disneyland, though not an exact copy. But it generally had the same "lands" and attractions.
Certain things in the Magic Kingdom were an improvement over the original - namely, the architectural transitions between each land. But in other ways, the park seemed more "boxy" and "workmanlike" - larger, "grander", and more "spectacular" in scale and scope, but certainly less CHARMING. And curiously missing many of the essential classics one would expect in a "Magic Kingdom"-style park.
Nowhere was this more evident than in "the happiest kingdom of them all", Fantasyland, which had significantly fewer attractions than Disneyland's Fantasyland. No less than FOUR of the Disneyland classics were inexplicably nowhere to be found. (that number would eventually grow to FIVE with the 1983 Disneyland addition of Pinocchio's Daring Journey, SIX with the 1998 MK removal of Mr. Toad's Wild Ride, and now it's at SEVEN with the recent loss of Snow White's Adventures).
And the fact that Fantasyland was the Orlando Magic Kingdom section most deficient and missing the most key attractions found at Disneyland was something I've always been highly attuned to, since Fantasyland has always been my favorite section at a Disneyland/Magic Kingdom-style park.
But still, for those of us on the East Coast or Southeastern United States, having a smaller (in attractions) Disneyland much closer to home within relatively short, convenient driving distance, was better than no Disneyland at all. There was always hope that those missing attractions would one day materialize, and in the meantime, one enjoyed what one had.
But, other than the early addition of Pirates to Adventureland; an early Tomorrowland expansion that brought Space Mountain, Carousel of Progress, and the Peoplemover/Astro Orbiter complex; the eventual additions of Thunder and Splash Mountains to Frontierland; and finally, the addition of the sadly now-closed Mickey's Toontown Fair land to the outskirts of Fantsyland, the park never really grew by expanding it's footprint or TOTAL number of attractions.
Indeed, even AFTER all of the additions described above, the park had at least a dozen FEWER attractions to offer it's guests in its 108 acres than Disneyland had in its 80 acres.
And yet, the preferred "expansion" mode of choice for Magic Kingdom managers has traditionally been "addition through subtraction" - that is, acting as if the park is already completely built out, ignoring all of its numerous expansion pads (clearly visible in satellite photos), and choosing instead to build "new" attractions on space already occupied by "old" ones, causing the unnecessary removal of these existing attractions. Sometimes, attractions would even disappear without even being replaced by a new one.
So much for Walt's ideals of a Florida utopia with "the blessing of size" and "enough land to hold ALL the ideas and plans we can possibly imagine"! Instead, the Magic Kingdom (and later Epcot) were being run like landlocked shopping malls that had no room to expand and a limited amount of store plots - meaning the only way they could ever add a "new" one was to close an existing one.
To those of us who KNEW of all the available space, KNEW of Walt's quote, and KNEW what Walt Disney World was TRULY capable of becoming, this strategy of addition through subtraction was such a complete insult to one's intelligence...
Fortunately, it took awhile for things to get completely out of hand. Although my favorite attraction, The Mickey Mouse Revue, was tragically shipped to Tokyo Disneyland in 1980 rather than the company spending the money to build Tokyo a new one from scratch like all the other Opening Day Tokyo attractions, in hindsight this seemed to be an anomaly, and WDW entered the 90's with all of its other classic attractions intact, both in the Magic Kingdom and Epcot.
And then, in the second half of the nineties, came The Great Purge...
One by one, beloved classic attractions were aggressively closed, and sometimes not even replaced, instead of new things being built from scratch.
In just a few short years:
* Epcot lost the original Journey Into Imagination ride, which was replaced by a Figment-free version of the ride that was so universally hated, the company had to build a third version, featuring Figment again, that was much better than the second, but not as good as the first.
* The charming Kitchen Kabaret became the "hipper", pop-culture referencing Food Rocks, which too eventually disappeared leaving NO musical animatronic food revue in The Land pavilion.
* The warm and humorous classic animatronic extravaganza World of Motion darkride closed to make way for Test Track, a thrill attraction lacking the charm found in it's predecessor
* Horizons, another animatronic classic dark ride that arguably expressed the theme of Epcot's Future World better than any other attraction, was replaced with Mission Space, instead of building a new building for the Space pavilion on one of Future World's expansion pads.
Meanwhile, things were just as bad at the Magic Kingdom. All within a few short years of each other:
* The beloved, charming Enchanted Tiki Room show was replaced with an obnoxious, abrasive sequel that actually made fun of the classic original show (and by extension, those who loved it).
* WDW management never bothered to reopen the beloved classic 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea submarine attraction after what was thought to be a routine rehab, leaving it shuttered for years. Even fans who were regulars at the park in this era never even had the chance to say goodbye to it and get whatever "closure" they could have gotten if WDW had been upfront in advance about a permanent closing of the ride.
* Even Walt Disney himself was not exempt from being totally and completely disrespected by WDW and MK management. The attraction that featured his name and paid tribute to his life's work, the Walt Disney Story, was removed from Town Square, although this wrong was somewhat righted some years later when a similar attraction opened at the Hollywood Studios park.
But the closure that caused the most controversy among the fan community, and was the straw that broke the camel's back for me personally, leading to an eight year personal "boycott" of Walt Disney World (although all the other closures above played a big role as well), was the 1998 closure of the Fantasyland classic darkride, Mr. Toad's Wild Ride.
And the reason given for the closure simply defied logic and was an insult to everyone's intelligence - they needed the space for a Winnie-the-Pooh ride.
Now, I personally love Winnie-the-Pooh and ended up enjoying the ride, in fact, it's become a favorite. But at the time the enthusiasm I would have felt for it's upcoming debut was completely crushed, knowing it was coming at the expense of one of my favorite attractions in the park.
As stated above, the MK Fantasyland attraction roster has ALWAYS been woefully deficient when compared to Disneyland's. Here was a chance to begin to make up for it by building a brand new Pooh ride from scratch, without touching any of the classics already in the park. Satellite photos clearly showed a TON of land between Fantasyland and the railroad tracks completely unused. Land that WDW management would pretend didn't exist... until now, since they are using it for the woefully underwhelming current Fantasyland expansion.
Remember Walt's quote above as one can almost hear him whispering from beyond...
- ..."enough land here to hold ALL the ideas and plans we can possibly imagine"...
"JT Toad", a regular poster in the online fan community, had enough of WDW management's nonsense, and just one day after the announcement of Toad's impending demise, launched
SaveToad.com, making the eloquent case as to why it was such a huge mistake to close Toad.
He soon had thousands of supporters and even regular "Save Toad" rallies took place in the park by green-shirted protesters, but it didn't matter to WDW management. They murdered Toad anyway, proving in the process that they didn't care how much heartbreak the murder of beloved, still-popular classics like Toad would leave in their wake.
Meanwhile, just as The Great Purge had gotten underway, having just finished college, I had begun to do what many a hardcore Disney parkfan considers - look into the feasibility of moving to Orlando to make the parks a regular part of my life - not just something to daydream about most of the year/s until I could visit them on "vacation".
I was unaware of all the sickening closures that were going on in the parks, having not been in a few years, but I realized I could use a new tool I had just learned about in the campus library - the Internet - to catch up on and read about the parks from a variety of sources - including the thoughts and experiences of other fans themselves.
What I saw shocked me. So many beloved classics had closed or were about to close, and Mr. Toad's impending doom had just been announced. People like JT Toad of savetoad.com, Al Lutz (playing a similar role as Disneyland watchdog), and Merlin Jones (who would later write great things for SaveDisney) cared more about the parks and the classic attractions than the people in charge of running them!
So when WDW management stomped on the hearts of all who cared about Mr. Toad's Wild Ride, I decided to follow JT Toad's lead and stop visiting WDW for the foreseeable future, at least until things improved. Not only were my tentative relocation plans off the table, but any future trips were, as well. Why give money to people who callously DESTROY things you love?
Now some would say I "was only hurting myself", but I disagree, and still do.
For one thing, to give them my business so soon after such crushing closures would have in effect been saying I was okay with their decisions, which I wasn't. By withholding my business, I was "putting my money where my mouth was", and being true to my beliefs - the customer speaking with his wallet.
More importantly, the classics that were removed were all personal favorites and therefore a big reason why I fell in love with Magic Kingdom and Epcot in the first place. Not having them in the parks made the parks feel like fraudulent, incomplete, imposter, alternate-universe versions of themselves, and certainly not the parks I fell in love with. The idea of visiting the parks without these attractions was extremely unappealing, like the idea of buying a copy of your favorite film with several scenes missing, or a copy of your favorite album with several tracks chopped off by the record company.
It was as if The Beatles had carried on as a band in the 70's - but without John, Paul, George, and Ringo; George Washington had been dynamited off of Mount Rushmore; or a mustache had been painted on the Mona Lisa.
Still, there were favorite attractions that survived intact in these hacked, butchered, versions of parks I once considered masterpieces, so I hesitated to say I'd NEVER be back. But time would have to pass, things would have to improve, and leadership would have to change...
For the next few years, I was able to take my mind off of Walt Disney World, and didn't miss it.
I kept in touch with my theme park passion by visiting other parks closer to home, including a new one that opened in New Orleans in 2000 (Jazzland, later known as Six Flags New Orleans). For the first time since childhood, I had a theme park in my own city to play in (sadly, this park would only last 6 seasons due to a certain hurricane).
Meanwhile, I kept in touch with "Disney Magic" mainly via the classic film library, especially the Disney Animated Classics, which always seemed more "Disney" to me than the parks, anyway. Vault Disney was going strong on the Disney Channel, so I was also getting heavily into the classic live action films, the anthology series, and Zorro during this era. I became obsessed with collecting Disney films on the newly surging DVD format. I was especially excited by the Platinum Series and the idea of collecting 2-disc sets for all of the animated classics.
One great thing about the films is that, after I bond with them and own my copy, Disney can't "close" them, make them disappear forever, and pretend they don't exist and never existed, like they do with their park attractions.
My collection of Disney soundtrack CDs was also growing and were constant companions during this era.
On November 30, 2003, Roy Disney resigned from the Walt Disney Company and launched SaveDisney.com. The site's brilliant editor, Merlin Jones, wrote a series of excellent articles highlighting what was wrong with the company. One of the areas addressed was the theme parks, and he addressed the same types of concerns that myself and many other fans had regarding the direction of the parks. This was the first ray of hope that things could improve.
When SaveDisney succeeded and Michael Eisner eventually resigned in 2005, and I realized that WDW hadn't made any significant missteps since the late 90's closures listed above, I began to consider the possibility of another trip. Though the aesthetic perfection of the totality of the MK and Epcot as complete parks had been marred by the closures of beloved favorite attractions, there were other beloved favorites still intact, and I didn't want to go the rest of my life never experiencing those favorite attractions again. So perhaps it was time to give WDW another chance.
And then Hurricane Katrina happened. New Orleans was like a third world country in the immediate aftermath (no electricity, martial law, etc), so my initial "weekend evacuation" before the storm hit turned into months on the road traveling and exploring to escape the unpleasantness - with an eye for ending my "tour" in central Florida not as a vacationer, but as a RESIDENT.
So in early 2006, I found myself doing something that seemed highly improbable a few short years earlier - living in Florida, buying a WDW Annual Pass, and visiting the parks.
While it was nice being there after so long, the changes and missing beloved favorites took some getting used to. I tried to work around this by telling myself that, yes, the "true" Orlando Magic Kingdom and Epcot I was used to were dead, and that I was in an alternate version of the MK like Tokyo Disneyland, Disneyland Paris, or Hong Kong Disneyland. Those parks (especially Hong Kong and to a lesser extent, Paris) are missing many of the essential classics found (or that were once found) in the US parks, but they are nice for what they are, with Tokyo coming closest to having all of the essential classics.
This helped some, but there was another obstacle. Hurricane Katrina had made me more cynical and bitter than I had ever been in my life.
So much so that after my first day in the Magic Kingdom, seeing my surviving favorite attractions but not FEELING them, I began to wonder if the "magic" of the parks could ever reach my Inner Child again...
More than any other parks, Disney parks aren't about physical thrills as much as they are about "Magic" and "Wonder" and about making/feeling an emotional connection with the place.
But on that first day back at WDW after the storm, in 2006 after more than an 8 year absence, I wasn't completely "feeling" it.
It was nice seeing my old favorite surviving attractions again, but there was still a large degree of emotional "disconnect" - I wasn't seeing things through the eyes of my inner 8-year old like I normally would. Nothing really gave me goosebumps or made me cry (tears of happiness) like it normally would, especially after not being there for awhile.
My last ride of that first night was Big Thunder Mountain Railroad. After that, since Wishes (the firework show) would be starting at park closing, I was trying to make it to Fantasyland or in front of the Castle for my first-ever viewing of Wishes. But I mistimed things and the fanfare started playing while I was walking along the riverfront.
So I stopped and watched along the river, near the Frontierland/Liberty Square border, and I could see some of the shells beautifully reflecting in the water.
I felt the first tinge of goosebumps when Peter Pan says "I wish we'd never have to grow up - off to Neverland!", followed by Pinocchio's "Jiminy, someday I wish I could be a real boy", and Aladdin's "Genie, I wish for your freedom".
But what really got me was the finale. What makes this show isn't just the visuals of the fireworks, but the combination of the fireworks WITH the soundtrack - both music and dialogue.
When good overcomes the forces of evil, and Jiminy says "It's the Blue Fairy!" and then the Blue Fairy is represented by the rapid-fire big blue bursts scored to the Wishes fanfare and then says "Remember, we must always believe in our Wishes, for they are the Magic in the world. Now, let's all put our hearts together, and make a wish come true", I just completely and totally lost it. It was the first real cry I had since the storm, and the first time that day (or since the storm) that I saw anything in life again through the eyes of my inner little boy.
That finale was really a transcendental spiritual experience for me. I remember feeling such a sense of relief that I hadn't lost my inner child and childlike sense of wonder. This was also the first moment where I felt the internalized angst of the storm begin to wash away. Since then, I am happy to say that the jaded cynicism and bitterness I felt in the aftermath of the storm has completely faded away, and I have seen all 4 WDW parks through the eyes of my inner child, getting the goosebumps and tears of joy in many places where they didn't come that first day.
Since that first viewing, I have seen Wishes many, many times, and during nearly each one of them I've been moved by it. Maybe not to tears every single time, but usually at least goosebumps.
These were halcyon days for me, those first years as a Florida resident with a WDW AP, seeing the parks through the eyes of my inner child, and being moved by them.
But this, sadly, eventually began to fade, and not due to me relapsing into any post-Katrina state of bitterness, but due to developments in the parks themselves.
The first sign of cracks starting to appear in what I had begun to accept as the new, alternate-universe Walt Disney World was the closure of the Pocahontas and Her Forest Friends attraction at Animal Kingdom in 2008. This wonderful show featured the beautiful song "Colors of the Wind" and some intricate, charming, behaviours by live animals. It was both entertaining and poignant, and like the best WDW attractions, worked on a deeper level, expressing Animal Kingdom's underlying messages of conservation, showing respect and love for ALL living things, and living in harmony with Nature. And yet it closed, and the theatre sat vacant for the remaining 4 years of my WDW AP membership, with no replacement.
For the first time in nearly 10 years, WDW had made a horrible, aesthetically illogical, move which hinted back to the heyday of The Great Purge in the late 90's - especially since it was closed without a replacement.
At the time, I gave them the benefit of the doubt, rationalizing that live theatre shows like this in theme parks tend to have a much shorter life span than rides and continuously loading, non-live shows (like 3-D films and animatronic shows). And yet, closed live theatre shows are almost always replaced by something (usually a new show) and this one wasn't.
There were a few other smaller signs as well. Entertainment cuts at Epcot saw the removal of some of my favorite live musical groups, such as Spellman's Gledje in Norway and Si Xian in China - both removed without being replaced by anything. Perhaps even more shocking was the removal of Lights of Winter, Epcot's signature Christmas light display, in 2009. Despite vocal protests from many in the online WDW fan community, it has never returned since or been replaced by anything, leaving Epcot without a signature light display during the holidays.
But my "honeymoon" with the new WDW really began to unravel with the closure of the MK's Mickey's Toontown Fair in 2011 - the first time in Disney Theme Park history than an ENTIRE LAND in one of the parks was destroyed.
I was a big fan of this section, especially the charming Mickey's House and Minnie's House attractions. They were absolutely PACKED with charming details both inside and out that provided fun references to the classic cartoon shorts featuring these beloved characters, while also creating rich "backstory" that made them believable as Mickey and Minnie's Houses. But perhaps most importantly, these charming design details also gave the Houses a very warm and happy feeling, and truly make them feel like "Homes".
Being from New Orleans and dealing with the aftermath of Katrina, the concept of what makes a house a "Home" is something that was fresh on my mind when first arriving in Orlando in 2006. Almost everyone I know lost everything they owned (I was one of the luckier ones as I had a second-story apartment higher than the water line), and I've seen the sad devastation of Homes flooded above the roof having to be torn down and turned to rubble.
I've often read of the architecture of the Disney parks being referred to as the "architecture of reassurance" and I certainly feel Mickey and Minnie's Houses fit this description with their colorful palettes and whimsical "squash and stretch" curved architecture; and the aforementioned warm and inviting interiors. I remember even thinking during those days, that it was nice that a hurricane had never destroyed Mickey and Minnie's Homes like it destroyed so many others back home that I was familiar with. These were wonderful refuges that would hopefully always be safe from that sad fate...
I never thought in 2006 after moving to Florida (at first year-round, then seasonally), that just a few years later, I would be mourning the loss of those very Mouse Homes that were so warm, welcoming, and felt like "home" to me when I first arrived in Florida and had a place to live, but didn't have a "home" in the emotional sense. And this loss was not due to any storm destroying them either, but the company itself tearing down Mickey and Minnie Mouse's Homes. Perhaps my feelings on this matter are enhanced partly because of Katrina, but in any case the idea of this happening just seems so cold and incongruous with what the "Disney Magic" is supposed to be all about, at least for me.
And something sad and significant began to happen to me during the last week of Toontown and Mickey and Minnie's Homes. I first noticed it during the "Dream Along With Mickey" Castle show, and later during Wishes. These shows are about the power of believing in your dreams, and wishes coming true. Some would say Disney overuses words like "Wishes", "Dreams", and "Believe" in their in-park entertainment productions, almost in a quasi-religious sort of way, but nonetheless I can't help feeling touched by them.
But on my visit that last week of Toontown, these shows just felt so HOLLOW and EMPTY to me. Hearing the talk of "Wishes" and "Dreams" just made me think of the Wishes and Dreams of the real little kids (and kids at heart) who love Mickey and Minnie's Homes and won't be able to visit them anymore. (Indeed, I saw several children, and even a few parents, CRYING with sadness during their last visit in Toontown. WDW is NOT supposed to be like this!)
And the great irony of seeing Mickey smiling away on stage at the Castle show talking about "Dreams Coming True If You Just Believe" just seemed so incongruous with the idea that his Home would soon have a date with the wrecking ball! This killed the illusion that it really is his house, because in "real life", Mickey and the gang would be protesting in the street with signs to save their Homes!
(And yes, I know on one level it's a "business" and an "illusion", but my point is the parks are more fun, and you can FEEL them more, when you let yourself go with, and COMPLETELY buy into, the Fantasy of the stories being told in the parks.)
So, what I'm getting at is, on my visits to the Magic Kingdom during the Toontown closure, I felt a level of cynicism and jadedness that even Katrina couldn't sustain. The "Magic" of the parks was able to defeat the cynicism I initially felt on my first visit after Katrina, but on my final visit during the Toontown closure, when the source of the cynicism was THE PARKS THEMSELVES (ie, the decision to tear down Toontown and the Mouse Homes) I didn't fare as well. On that day, I got a hollow and cynical glimpse of it being "just a business", of the MK being "just a theme park", and the talk of "Wishes and Dreams will come true if you just Believe" just seemed like a Big Lie and a shallow, empty, hypocritical facade in the context of Toontown closing.
And, for the first time ever, I felt NOTHING while viewing Wishes.
And that, more than anything, spoke volumes to me that it was a good time for a break.
A self-imposed break that would eventually last even longer than initially expected, thanks to the next earth-shattering announcement - that one of my all-time favorite Walt Disney World attractions, Snow White's Adventures, would meet the same egregious fate as Mr. Toad's Wild Ride. In this case, not even for a new dark ride, but for a character "meet and greet" they could have put anywhere else. Or maybe not, as apparently having 28,000 acres to work with just isn't enough.
Needless to say, by this point, I was devastated, and all the good will WDW had partially won back from me (after I already walked away from them once after the late 90's Great Purge) was as gone as the numerous classic attractions they murdered and like to pretend didn't exist....
So now, my long-term exit strategy was beginning to form. My Annual Pass expired shortly after the bulldozers ravaged Toontown, and I was bombarded with multiple desperate letters from WDW reminding me of this, which I gladly threw in the rubbish. "You should have thought of that before you bulldozed Toontown and decided to kill Snow White's Adventures", I thought.
It's a LOT harder to win back a customer's loyalty and trust after you shatter it, and INFINITELY harder to do so after you shatter it a second time. And this was exactly what TDO ("Team Disney Orlando", the formal name of WDW management) would now have to do to get me back.
Yet, I knew I wanted to be there for the final day of Snow White's Adventures, and my AP had expired shortly after the closure of Toontown.
I knew I'd have to hold my nose and renew if I wanted the desired sense of closure with Snow White, but if I did so in early 2011, right after Toontown closed, I ran the risk of the pass expiring AGAIN before the Snow White closure (its date had not yet been announced), which would mean renewing TWICE.
There was NO WAY they were getting that much money off of me, so I waited until the Snow White closure date was announced and then renewed for the final time (at least for a LONG, LONG time - possibly longer than the time I stayed away for eight years after the Great Purge).
I was really proud of the fact that I strategically avoided having to renew twice to be there for Snow White's last day!
That last year as an AP holder, I knew would be my last for awhile, so I not only said a long, gradual goodbye to Snow White's Adventures, but to everything else in all 4 WDW parks as well. Just in case this goodbye really was forever, and also to get closure with anything else that I loved that would inevitably close during my upcoming years of planned WDW exile.
So, 2012 at WDW was, for me, my last lap, a "lame duck" year of goodbyes, not just to the attractions, but also to many of the Cast Members with whom I had developed a friendly rapport with as a long-time patron of the parks. Of those whom I had revealed my plans to end my patronage of the WDW parks for the foreseeable future, most were supportive and understanding, and some even agreed (off the record) that the closures were wrong. But a few got defensive and recited the tired, stale, company lines wherein any change, even the murder of someone's beloved, favorite attractions, is for the best, representing so-called "progress".
And that's something I noticed about the fickle nature of life inside Pixiedustland. As long as these attractions existed, Disney themselves, who make billions of dollars off of creating parks and attractions that people nurture an EMOTIONAL connection with, would label them "Magical", but as soon as the decision from "on high" comes to kill them off, there seems to be an unwritten rule that we are supposed to be good little sheep and accept this without question. Pretend that these attractions, and the aesthetic love we have for them, never existed; sever the bond; forget all about them; even lie to ourselves and tell ourselves that they weren't that great, because, it is in TDO's best interest that guests and CM's feel this way, and we should be good little unquestioning Disney citizens.
RUBBISH!
When I bond with something, that bond is FOR LIFE, and if someone says something bad about it, or tries to destroy it, I dig my heels in and defend it.
As Travis says in Old Yeller, "We can't just shoot him like he's nothing".
Or, a more modern quote from Lilo and Stitch:
"Ohana means family. Family means nobody gets left behind. Or forgotten."
For me, Snow White's Adventures, Toontown, Toad, and all the other beloved murdered favorite attractions at WDW were like FAMILY, and part of the FAMILY of the parks, and I can't and won't forget them, leave them behind, or throw them away like they are nothing. Just as I would never get rid of a favorite DVD, CD, or book.
It is precisely due to this emotional connection that people feel with the Disney attractions (encouraged by Disney), that the Disney parks are held to a higher standard than most other parks - and that emotional connection is also at least partially why Disney theme parks charge the highest prices in the industry.
Another reaction I got from a few people was how could I leave the WDW parks (a collective) due to the loss of a few attractions, beloved as they may be (an individual).
I can see why this may be hard to understand, but I tend in general to value individuals more than collectives. More specifically, there are some individual elements of each collective that, were they to be lost, the whole would collapse - if not literally/materially, at least on an aesthetic, spiritual, or other intangible level. Due to the nature of intangibles, this can't be proven scientifically; it is subjective and something you have to FEEL to understand.
For example, the absence of certain scenes from a film could change, even destroy, the entire dynamic of a film. I gave other hypothetical examples at the beginning of this piece, of works of Art being radically altered for the worse due to the loss or alteration of individual components, such as George Washington being dynamited off Mount Rushmore, or a mustache painted on the Mona Lisa.
And that's how I feel about the Disney Parks.
I find it interesting that if someone, even the rights holder, of a work of Art such as the Mona Lisa, destroyed this Art, they would be universally criticized and vilified, and rightly so. If a media company that was the legal rights holder of a classic film that had not yet been released to home video destroyed every copy and ensured that no human being ever got to see it again, they too would be justly, universally criticized. Yet, Disney is doing the exact same thing every time they close one of their classic theme park attractions - stopping the entire human race from ever again experiencing the work of Art that is that attraction. Many even defend these vile acts of destruction, including the "Pixieduster" school of Disney fandom for whom corporate Disney can do no wrong.
And yet, I think most fans would agree that some of the parks' individual components are so essential that the idea of the parks existing without these components would destroy them (or at least severely damage them) aesthetically. Most would probably agree on the Castle being one of these elements.
Other elements would vary from person to person, such is the subjective nature of taste. Many fans would probably list perennial fan favorites like the Haunted Mansion and Pirates of the Caribbean as two such examples.
For me personally, Snow White's Adventures is at that level - attractions that I value so much, that the park existing without them seems unthinkable and empty to me.
I would even go as far as to say that I value my favorite attractions at any park MORE than I value the collective totality of the park itself. The individual favorite attractions are what I feel the strongest bonds with, more than any overall park. And I am willing to take a stand for these attractions, even at the expense of the larger collective of the overall parks they are/were a part of.
When you love a favorite entity (in this case, park attraction) at the highest level, and value everything about it, in your eyes it outshines the larger collective it is part of the set of. In the sense that there are some things in the larger collective you won't care for or value, so the collective can't possibly have the same level of aesthetic perfection that, in your eyes, the individual component, that you love fully and completely, does.
My favorite quote from the entire Star Trek series of films is when Kirk tells Spock "Sometimes, the needs of the one outweigh the needs of the many", which is a wonderful endorsement of individualism over collectivism, and sums up why I am willing to take such a strong stand in support of individual favorite attractions.
To put it simply, I love and value my favorite attractions more than I love and value the parks they stand/stood in, and those parks feel like empty shells without them.
Ohana means family.
Family means NOBODY gets left behind.
Or forgotten.