-
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 1:31 pm
-






I'm confused. The biggest flaw in The Lion King is that young Simba is unlikable? I'm sorry, I may have missed the memo, but who says we have to like him?Lazario wrote:Not to mention no one could top Confused Matthew's (obviously not a member of TGwtG but a fellow Blipper) take on The Lion King. A video I cannot possibly recommend more highly: http://www.confusedmatthew.com/The-Lion-King.php (one mistake, though: he seems to have included Beauty and the Beast in what he considers to be flawless Disney films).
Good, than I know both CM and I did our jobs. However, Matthew did an incredible job in taking the film apart. For example, near the close of his review he mentioned the biggest problem with the film was that all the characters (not just Simba) were either evil or stupid. That happens to be true. Just re-watch the 3rd part video where he BRILLIANTLY re-enacts the ending with real logic. He did a perfect job in explaining why all the characters are either stupid or "evil" (intensely selfish). Doesn't that make the movie's problem bigger than just Simba? Why didn't you mention that in your reply? Did you watch the entire review?PatrickvD wrote:I'm confused. The biggest flaw in The Lion King is that young Simba is unlikable? I'm sorry, I may have missed the memo, but who says we have to like him?
The whole point was that young Simba was an ass. But being tricked into believing he killed his own father sort of redeemed him, didn't it? I mean for God's sake he was depressed for the entire second half of the film. He paid for nine lifetimes of mistakes.
And that's coming from someone who doesn't care that much for TLK. I truly believe some people are just desperate to rip apart beloved films. Why? Attention of course. We all know internet attention means ... uhm... nothing?
![]()
Sorry, nothing against you Lazario. I was just angered by that review.
Pretty much this. Lion King by no mean is the best thing but the hate it gets seems to me people just try to hate the film just to be non conformist and "hip". CM's review to me felt like he was trying to rip apart the film just for sake of it. The only legit criticism I think was a good point from him was the plothole about Zaru not being able backfire Scar's announcement of Simba and Mufasa's deaths and the lioness not being suspicious about it.PatrickvD wrote:. I truly believe come people are just desperate to rip apart beloved films. Why? Attention of course. We all know internet attention means ... uhm... nothing?
![]()
Sorry, nothing against you Lazario. I was just angered by that review.
I find almost all of them at TGWTG to be very attention whorish and hypocrites. They take unsettling offense if someone find their review, movies, or opinion as shit or crap. Spoony a prime example of that. I recall hearing this is why Pap64 left TGWTG site.Lazario wrote: Your "attention" theory seems pretty crude to me. For example, so The Nostalgia Chick isn't desperate for attention herself when she does a Disney video that would leave viewers thinking she loved the movie or show she was talking about but if she'd done an anti-Lion King video, that would make her an attention-whore?
That would make sense and all, but... did you happen to miss the part where he explained the reason why he was doing this was because he's always felt this way about the film? Not to mention, much like PatrickvD, you're coming to the defense of the film with an attitude of "how could anyone not like the movie?" even though you claim you don't think it's perfect. Perhaps I'm reading you wrong but, I don't see the motivation for this insight of yours. Except maybe exposing Spoony for being a jerk but this movie, review, reviewer, etc(.) have nothing to do with Spoony. This only adds to the necessity I feel of CM's review. He has a point, only I'll add to it with: this movie seems to trigger a weird response in people that makes them defend it for ridiculous reasons. People: the planet will keep spinning if a few people are allowed to speak their mind. "Conformity"? Either way, has nothing to do with it.Super Aurora wrote:CM's review to me felt like he was trying to rip apart the film just for sake of it.
Really? Why weren't all his criticisms legit? I happen to think they were. Does that make me a non-comformist too?Super Aurora wrote:The only legit criticism

Lazario wrote: That would make sense and all, but... did you happen to miss the part where he explained the reason why he was doing this was because he's always felt this way about the film?
Not to mention, much like PatrickvD, you're coming to the defense of the film with an attitude of "how could anyone not like the movie?" even though you claim you don't think it's perfect. Perhaps I'm reading you wrong but, I don't see the motivation for this insight of yours.
Except maybe exposing Spoony for being a jerk but this movie, review, reviewer, etc(.) have nothing to do with Spoony. This only adds to the necessity I feel of CM's review. He has a point, only I'll add to it with: this movie seems to trigger a weird response in people that makes them defend it for ridiculous reasons. People: the planet will keep spinning if a few people are allowed to speak their mind. "Conformity"? Either way, has nothing to do with it.
It been a long while since I saw the review so I don't remember every detail, not to mention i'm hearing impaired and isn't able to hear every word being said. But the one I did hear and that did catch me that I remember, that one I did find reasonable criticism to be understandable.Lazario wrote:Really? Why weren't all his criticisms legit? I happen to think they were. Does that make me a non-comformist too?
Maybe that wasn't nice of me to say and I should of said it differently but when I'm getting at is that I haven't find any real criticism to that magnitude as people made it out as. Hence why it lead me to an impression of seeming people hating it just because it was popular. Although you could say in counterargument against me that same could be said with you vs others viewpoint on Sleeping Beauty. But from the way I look at the two if we are to just criticize just solely on story points and characters development, SB seems to have much more glaring errors to spot than Lion King does. And I like both films.Lazario wrote:Seriously, people- this whole "non conformist" bullshit (which I saw in the other thread where this review was mentioned) is literally the worst argument I have ever heard for why people not only dislike this movie but for why they would actually voice their opinion about it.
Pap64 was only a member at the site, but from what he told me, he gradually started to find them more and more obnoxious and "elitist" and thus started to dislike many of them through experience and such. You will have to ask him about the stories as he knows it more and was much more involved and knowledgable with the history of that site. When I watched some of the stuff to see what he was talking about, it did started to make sense and clear to me why he said that. Two members I know Pedro really loathe, that he told me, is JewWario and Sean Fausz.Lazario wrote:However, I'm definitely intrigued to hear more about this darkside of TGwtG stories. I don't watch Spoony or Linkara (though I've heard a lot of people don't like him either) but... I didn't know pap64 used to... make videos over there? Or, did he talk on their live chats or something? Message board? Not that this compares in either way but I submitted a very lengthy disagreement over one of Oancitizen's reviews and ended up talking it out with the woman who does his title animation images and I never had any problem with people rejecting my take on their reviews. Of course, there only are a couple people who actively answer back to their fans on the board. Diamanda is one.
Way to miss a point.Lazario wrote:Not to mention, much like PatrickvD, you're coming to the defense of the film with an attitude of "how could anyone not like the movie?" even though you claim you don't think it's perfect.
Thanks.PatrickvD wrote:Way to miss a point.
Well, that's your perception. In reality, The Lion King is far from being one of Disney's biggest punching bags. That's because it's considered one of the studio's biggest hits and audience favorites. I thought you knew that as well. So, I hope you can understand where I'm coming from. Why would you bother to even question why someone would have serious problems with the film if you yourself can see it's overrated? It's not bashed that often, what you mean to say is that some people bash it harder than others. Not the same thing. So, what you're really asking is why do some people bash it so hard. And I think Confused Matthew explained that perfectly. All the characters in the film are stupid / unlikable and the story is extremely void of typical logic. Those things together are not a good combination. And, again so you can see where I'm coming from- it's a huge change in formula from The Little Mermaid and Aladdin, which is I hope why you can now see why I dislike Lion King and Beauty and the Beast so much. It's not a matter of just one character or a few logic problems.Super Aurora wrote:All I'm saying is I don't think or see TLK as bad as people make it out to be. Is it overrated? Sure. I can see that from others point of view. Is it so down right horrible at level of say Home on the Range and such? I have hard time seeing that. We aren't defending the film in sense because we may like it, but more of asking why is it bashed so often.
Fine. But, now think of it in the context of who raised him. You need to remember the amount of reverence Mufasa carries in every scene, the huge deal the movie frequently makes of it, and then think: how could he have raised such a little bastard like Simba? Can anyone possibly explain that with something real the movie provides or is it just going to be another impression people who liked (or, in your case, didn't hate) the movie got?Super Aurora wrote:I don't grasp the some of the flaws people are complaining about with TLK such as "kid Simba is a brat" that I heard some say. I mean, he's a kid and kids of royalty are brats.
After the reasons I've already mentioned, it's all personal bias: I can't stand the movie's music (with the exception of Scar's villain song). The voice actors are mostly obnoxious. The story ideas are just lame- I would much rather have seen what Walt Era Disney would have done with the idea than the Broadway Musical Era Disney. Again, personal bias, but I am not a fan of the kind of epics Disney started producing at that time. And even if I had been, I would say Aladdin is a far better mix and a more magical movie.Super Aurora wrote:Maybe you can elaborate for me and the others who you say are "so triggered to defend it", on why it's so bad with bullet points or such.
That explains it.Super Aurora wrote:Now I will admit that I been a long while since I saw CM's review but from what I did remember, I didn't find it anything of a fair criticism. That's all.
Ha. Well, if we both don't agree on popularity being a shitty way of deciding what's good or not, the issue here is much bigger than majority opinion over one movie. I never use popularity as an excuse to say something is good or bad. And I expect the same from people capable of using their brain.Super Aurora wrote:Maybe that wasn't nice of me to say and I should of said it differently but when I'm getting at is that I haven't find any real criticism to that magnitude as people made it out as. Hence why it lead me to an impression of seeming people hating it just because it was popular.
I actually have no idea what you're trying to say there. I would never compare Sleeping Beauty to The Lion King. Night and day.Super Aurora wrote:Although you could say in counterargument against me that same could be said with you vs others viewpoint on Sleeping Beauty.
I hope he does get around to this thread.Super Aurora wrote:Pap64 was only a member at the site, but from what he told me, he gradually started to find them more and more obnoxious and "elitist" and thus started to dislike many of them through experience and such. You will have to ask him about the stories as he knows it more and was much more involved and knowledgable with the history of that site. When I watched some of the stuff to see what he was talking about, it did started to make sense and clear to me why he said that. Two members I know Pedro really loathe, that he told me, is JewWario and Sean Fausz.
You're welcome... damn, why don't we have these hugging emoticons?? They're corny enough for this very moment.Lazario wrote:Thanks.PatrickvD wrote:Way to miss a point.![]()