Page 1 of 1

Bill Clinton gets a cameo in the sequel to The Hangover

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:15 pm
by disneyboy20022
http://omg.yahoo.com/news/bill-clinton- ... er-2/50645


:shifty:
The United States had had an actor-turned-president in Ronald Reagan. Now we have a president-turned actor?

Bill Clinton is making a cameo in The Hangover 2, according to People.

The 64-year-old ex-president will play himself in the sequel to the 2009 box-office hit that raked in more than $277 million. Clinton shot his appearance while in Bangkok, Thailand, over the weekend.


Clinton previously has put his stamp on pop culture. In 1992, the then candidate played his saxophone on Arsenio Hall, and in 1993, he answered the question of boxers or briefs on MTV.

The Hangover 2 stars Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms, Zach Galifianakis and Justin Bartha.

And if there's anyone who has the authority of knowledge of Boxers or Briefs it's Bill Clinton :P (or Monica :shifty:)

Re: Bill Clinton gets a cameo in the sequel to The Hangover

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:08 pm
by SpringHeelJack
In 1992, the then candidate played his saxophone on Arsenio Hall.
A moment perhaps even better recalled in the opening credits to "Animaniacs."
disneyboy20022 wrote:And if there's anyone who has the authority of knowledge of Boxers or Briefs it's Bill Clinton.
UM NO IT'S ME.

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:13 pm
by Goliath
That's funny! We (The Netherlands) had a vice-prime-minister a few years ago who also made a cameo appearance in a movie, but he played the role of prime-minister (like he always had wanted to be). :lol:

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:48 pm
by dvdjunkie
Thought the first movie was a "turkey", so why should this one be any better because we have a known adulterer in it for a cameo role.

"The Hangover" just wasn't funny, and those who think it was, well that who it was aimed for, those with the only taste they have is in their mouth.

Won't catch me near this turkey, if and when it gets released.

:D

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 6:09 pm
by stewie15
Thought the first movie was a "turkey", so why should this one be any better because we have a known adulterer in it for a cameo role.

"The Hangover" just wasn't funny, and those who think it was, well that who it was aimed for, those with the only taste they have is in their mouth.

Won't catch me near this turkey, if and when it gets released.

:D
Why are all your posts super aggressive?!? :headshake:

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 6:17 pm
by Luke
stewie15 wrote:
Thought the first movie was a "turkey", so why should this one be any better because we have a known adulterer in it for a cameo role.

"The Hangover" just wasn't funny, and those who think it was, well that who it was aimed for, those with the only taste they have is in their mouth.

Won't catch me near this turkey, if and when it gets released.

:D
Why are all your posts super aggressive?!? :headshake:
That's not true. Everyone knows dvdjunkie offers wholehearted enthusiasm (in contrast to his full-on disapprovals) on occasion.

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 7:14 pm
by SpringHeelJack
ADULTERERS? IN THE TALKIES? SOMEBODY CUT ME A SWITCH!

Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 8:57 pm
by Just Myself
SpringHeelJack wrote:ADULTERERS? IN THE TALKIES? SOMEBODY CUT ME A SWITCH!
rotfl

As far as Clinton being in the film - I'm sure the cameo will be miniscule compared to Tyson in the first film. He shot all of his shots in one day.

Cheers,
JM :thumb:

Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:35 pm
by Siren
Luke wrote:
stewie15 wrote: Why are all your posts super aggressive?!? :headshake:
That's not true. Everyone knows dvdjunkie offers wholehearted enthusiasm (in contrast to his full-on disapprovals) on occasion.
That's the problem. While most people post in shades of gray, where they might not like something but don't attack those who do like it, dvdjunkie thinks his opinion is the only one that matters and anyone who doesn't agree with him, he has got to put down.

My boyfriend thought Year One was hilarious, I didn't find a bit of it funny, but I'm not gonna tell him he has no taste in movies and put him down for it.

Give an opinion, but don't insult. Its getting very old. Perhaps he needs to read the Tact thread pap wrote, to see he sometimes post some pretty mean, nasty, and even hurtful things. For someone of his maturity level, I expect so much more. Not a sense of entitlement, but rather, a sense of thought outside his own world of his opinion.

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:28 pm
by Lazario
Well, let's not forget that he also goes after Democratic people politically. And it's pretty obvious that nothing Clinton did with a woman was anywhere near as evil as what Bush Jr. did to this country. Really, 'junkie: it's time to get over it. It's just sex.

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:06 pm
by Flanger-Hanger
SpringHeelJack wrote:ADULTERERS? IN THE TALKIES? SOMEBODY CUT ME A SWITCH!
Is this a WIST yet?