Page 1 of 3

Disney/Pixar vs. DreamWorks/PDI - It Ends 11.5.04

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 4:00 pm
by Jake Lipson
Well, well, well...the most strangely incridible thing just happened, and it'll give Disney a chance to slay DreamWorks' direct movie-for-movie competition for the last time. After the expediated "Bug's Life" rebuttal "Antz" (self-explanitory) and (again expediated) "Monsters, Inc." response that was "Shrek," (CGI adventures of friendly monsters) Disney and DreamWorks have booked a final standoff. Pixar's newest The Incridibles and PDI's Sharkslayer (an answer to Pixar's Finding Nemo, both being the CGI adventures of sea creatures) are due in theaters day-and-date with one another. This will finally give Disney and Pixar the chance to end the redicilious battle by proving their superiority at the box office and in movie quality once and for all when directly competing with DreamWorks. And call be crazy but I think that once Disney wins by a landslide on 11.5.04 (which it will), DreamWorks might scale back on blaintly and obviously stealing Disney and Pixar's ideas for direct competition. Anyway, here's the clipping from Animated Movies if anyone cares for kinder words to DreamWorks.
DreamWorks Pictures' upcoming PDI-animated fish tale, Sharkslayer, scheduled for release November 5, 2004, has run into an unexpected rival--The Incredibles, the next animated feature from the Walt Disney Co. and Pixar, about a family of superheroes. Trailers for Incredibles, attached to the newly opened Finding Nemo, also are claiming the same November 5 opening date even though Sharkslayer got there first. "It looks like the moviegoing public will have lots to choose from on November 5," a Disney representative deadpanned. The current standoff could yet result in a strategic move on DreamWorks' part, though. "I am not willing to have this turn into nothing but a media circus," DreamWorks marketing chief Terry Press told The Hollywood Reporter. "Everyone will only be distracted from the quality of both films by this kind of playground behavior."
Animated Movies and The Hollywood Reporter put in a much nicer tone, but I guarentee you that what I've just said is the truth of the matter. Should DreamWorks not wimp out and swap release dates, the madness will end the weekend of November 5, 2004. :D!

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 4:05 pm
by jabroni76
I have a feeling that one of the t wo will get pushed up or back a little. It would be smarter, and generate more income!

...say move INcredibles to Christmas 2003??? :P

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 4:13 pm
by Porce
I hated Shrek. I think DW's 2D features are much, much better. Antz was surprisingly good, though.

Anyway, The Incredibles will CRUSH Shark Slayer--and that is totally obvious. The Incredibles already has a fan base just from the trailer--and to add to that, we have Brad Bird as director, who directed the masterpiece "The Iron Giant" (although that was a flop at the box office, more people know about the movie now). Regular everyday people know what "Pixar" means. "Pixar" means pure genius--moments that make you laugh hysterically, moments that make you gaze in wonder at the amazing visuals, moments where you are all choked up.

Advertising for "The Incredibles" has started a year and a half in advance. Shark Slayer is going to have to move to an earlier spot to get some money before it is totally crushed by The Incredibles.

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 4:33 pm
by Choco Bear
i think they could both be money makers cuz people dont care about the story jus the cgi element(not meaning everyone but people in general) but by puttting them on the same day it takes money away from each of them and it would be more money wise to change one of the dates, but on the other hand it wold be awsome to see disney vs dreamworks even tho disney will win :D

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 4:38 pm
by Luke
DreamWorks won't be so dumb as to open their film the same day as Pixar and get crushed. Somehow "From the Makers of Shrek" just doesn't carry the same weight that "From the Makers of Toy Story, A Bug's Life, Toy Story 2, Monsters Inc., and Finding Nemo" does.

Not that the advertising lingo matters, but maybe by the time The Incredibles comes out, people will actually know the Pixar name and we won't have to say "From the Makers of blah blah blah." Then again, probably not. There are people who think Pixar made Shrek.

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 4:50 pm
by Jake Lipson
I'm sure DreamWorks will try and move Sharkslayer up to get some quick bucks before The Incridibles, but I'd love it if they didn't, just to see them go head to head with Disney and scream bloody murder when Disney totally anilates then.

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 4:54 pm
by jabroni76
There are people who think Pixar made Shrek.
get this -- there are people who think pixar made Ice Age. I'm dead serious. Almost all of the 8th grade last year thought so. I was about to shoot them all. God, they were so stupid.

And also, all of these ESPN/Sports buff's were too ignorant to know and understand that Disney Own's ESPN. What losers I have in my grade! :roll:

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 5:25 pm
by Loomis
I have to say that I enjoyed 'Shrek' & 'Antz' a great deal. So much I own them on DVD. But then again they were DVDs that were available, and I'm easy that way. :wink:

However, my heart always goes with Pixar. Even if it weren't for the Disney connection, Pixar seem to make films that are just more fun. That is the only way I can describe it.

Big year this year for Disney-related flicks, let us hope next year is even better.

Go Disney/Pixar!!!

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 6:40 pm
by Papa Bear
I am actually looking forward to seeing both of them, true I am rooting for Disney/Pixar all the way. And if I could only see one of them I would it would definatley choose "The Incredibles." But knowing me I will see both on opening day. I have enjoyed all of the Dreamworks animated films some more than others. I would definatly have to say that I like the Disney counterparts better, but I am glad that a company outside of Disney has started making good quality animation. If nothing else they will help to keep Disney on their toes. It will be interesting to see how they do sharing an opening day but would prefer to see them open seperate so that they can both be a box office hit.

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 6:45 pm
by Porce
jabroni76 wrote:
There are people who think Pixar made Shrek.
get this -- there are people who think pixar made Ice Age. I'm dead serious. Almost all of the 8th grade last year thought so. I was about to shoot them all. God, they were so stupid.

And also, all of these ESPN/Sports buff's were too ignorant to know and understand that Disney Own's ESPN. What losers I have in my grade! :roll:
Yes, I had to tell all of my friends over and over that Pixar NEVER MADE Ice Age. There's a quality difference that average people just don't notice!

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:01 pm
by Prince Phillip
I have to admit that the way it was first advertised, or maybe I just wasnn't paying attention, but I thought Ice Age was a disney film. Not Pixar, but just disney, like dinosaur. It wasn't until I was working at suncoast, for the holiday season, that I learned it wasn't disney. :oops: opps. Oh well. I did like Ants better when it came out, but dislike Shrek with a passion. This is the first I've heard of Sharkslayer, should be interesting, I will see if this catches my eye.

People can be dumb, though I guess we can't expect much from the lazy movie goers. I remember working in suncoast people just assumed everything kids, was disney. Oh well what are you gonna do? :| .

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 1:35 am
by Sethp
What did you guys think about ice age? I thought it was pretty ok atleast better than Shrek but I guess that dosn't say very much ;)

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 2:14 am
by Loomis
Sethp wrote:What did you guys think about ice age? I thought it was pretty ok atleast better than Shrek but I guess that dosn't say very much ;)
I really didn't think much of Ice Age to be honest. I go to pretty much every animated film on the block (except Spirit - Bryan Adams just sh*ts me). I can't say exactly what was bad about it, it was just ...dumb.
Is that too harsh? The plot, the jokes did nothing for me. Some of the animation looked great, but overall it felt flat.

Shrek I still like. I know it is much maligned, but always have a soft spot for it. Perhaps it is because I am a sucker for a love story... :oops:

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 6:26 am
by Luke
Ice Age was really flat and mostly unfunny, but what bothered me most was the complete lack of originality. It was just lifted from every animated film released in the past, from Dinosaur to Shrek to Monsters Inc....and people loved it. To me, it felt like a retread and I really wanted to like it. But instead, I just don't hate it.

And don't get me started on Spirit: Stallion of the Crap (isn't that clever?) What a boring, offensive film. It makes Pocahontas look like a masterpiece.

Shrek is overrated, and was a terrible pick for the Oscar over MI, but at least it has some substance to it...even if you have to get through a lot of lame parodies and 'mature' humor.

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 9:19 am
by jabroni76
Luke... I actually think Ice Age was pretty good. Not the best, but pretty good. It kept me going.

I cannot agree with you more on the Spirit crap. My sister said she wanted to buy "spirit" and I assumed she meant SPIRITED AWAY (released the same week as she went to go buy). Well, she went to Target and returned with Spirit: Hey it's a bunch of crap. i basically slapped her, that child. ah!

And Shrek, well, shrek is okay. Not worth watching as much as Pinocchio, but still pretty good! Number two though, will probably suck!

ANTZ - dont get me started on that. I watched it when i wasn't biased towards Disney, and I still hated it with a passion. It was sooo gay!

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 1:32 pm
by Jake Lipson
Shrek was a great movie. However, because they spent at least half the runtime doing parodies of and taking jabs at Disney properties, it lacks the heartfeltness of Monsters, Inc. and any other Pixar movie.

I never saw Ice Age, but hopefully will rent it this weekend. Antz, well, that won't see on pure principle due to its being a Bug's Life rip. The same goes for Sharkslayer, which to my mind is ripped from Finding Nemo.

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 1:39 pm
by Jake Lipson
<b><i>"But wait, there's more!"</b></i> From <a href=http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=s ... c_eo/11929 target=blank>Yahoo! News</a>....
The Mouse has some major <i>cojones.</i> Bucking convention, Disney has slapped a November 5, 2004, release date on Pixar's The Incredibles--the same date previously picked by DreamWorks to release its animated feature Sharkslayer. And the calendar conflict is causing major problems for DreamWorks execs, who must time merchandising and licensing deals to the movie's release date. Now, despite having claimed the date last December, they're reportedly fishing for another weekend to launch the CG franchise, which has been described as an underwater mob movie featuring the voices of Will Smith, Robert De Niro, Martin Scorsese, René Zellweger and Angelina, among others. But it won't be easy.

The Friday before Thanksgiving is already tied up by another family friendly twofer, Warner Bros.' CG release Polar Express, which reteams longtime collaborators Tom Hanks and Robert Zemeckis, and a big-screen adaptation of TV's SpongeBob SquarePants from Paramount.

Early November has been good to Disney and partner Pixar since the release of Monsters, Inc. two years ago. Ironically, Disney was forced to juggle its November 2001 schedule to avoid going up against Warners' Thanksgiving release Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. That proven track record might explain the Mouse House's confidence. The company wasn't talking about its scheduling standoff except for a brief comment in Thursday's Variety. "It looks like the moviegoing public will have lots to choose from on November 5, 2004," said a spokesperson.

Along with Disney's The Incredibles, about a family of superheroes trying to live quietly in the suburbs, and the soon-to-be-gone Sharkslayer, the weekend was already tapped by 20th Century Fox for their release Fantastic Four, about a family of superheroes trying to deal with evil plots and the pressures of fame. Smells fishy.

According to the trade, there are a couple of factors at work over the dueling date and they've got nothing to do with pleasing the moviegoing public. First, the well known rivalry between Disney CEO Michael Eisner and DreamWorks principal Jeffrey Katzenberg, who sued for millions in unpaid bonuses after quitting the Happiest Place on Earth in 1994 and was subsequently dubbed "the little midget" by his former boss, Eisner. Also at stake is Pixar's contract with Disney, which expires soon. Showing a little love for the successful animation studio, which is behind Finding Nemo, could be a top priority for Disney.

Pixar's fish tale reeled in a whopping $70.3 million last weekend, the best-ever opening for an animated movie or for any Disney film, including previous collaborations Monsters, Inc ($62.5 million) in 2001, Toy Story 2 ($57.3 million) in 1999, A Bug's Life ($33.2 million) in 1998 and the original Toy Story ($29.1 million) in 1995. Until now, Disney split production costs with Pixar but took 60 percent of the profits and retained ownership and sequel rights. Pixar owes Disney two mores movies as part of that deal but has been in discussions with other studios about a distribution agreement that would let the animation company retain ownership of its flicks. As such, Eisner confessed to investors in New York on Tuesday: "I suspect we will change the kind of relationship we have with Pixar, but I am fairly confident we will continue to be in business with them."

Not on the Mouse's top priority list: showing any love for DreamWorks. In general, studios work to avoid the type of scheduling clashes that could cost box office dollars. But the 'toon market seems to have taken a particularly childish approach to the competition. In 1998 Katzenberg rushed Antz into theaters eight weeks before the release of A Bug's Life after Disney refused to budge Bugs's Thanksgiving release date which would interfere with Katzenberg's pet project, Prince of Egypt, which was later pushed back. DreamWorks continued the tit-for-tat rivalry in November 2001 when it launched the DVD of its pride and joy Shrek the same day Monsters, Inc. opened in theaters, even after Disney had staked out the date first.

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 1:53 pm
by jabroni76
The same goes for Sharkslayer, which to my mind is ripped from Finding Nemo.
Actually, Sharkslayer was annonced, then pixar came up with Nemo. So basically Nemo is a rip of Sharkslayer...

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 2:16 pm
by Maerj
Antz wasn't a rip off of A Bug's Life. Even though each film had insects as the title characters, the similarities end there. Antz is a Woody Allen moved geared more toward adults, Bug's Life was made more for family audiences. The plot of A Bug's Life was very similar, almost a loosely made parody of the Magnificent Seven. Which of course was a remake of the Seven Samurai.

It is sort of like when Deep Impact and Armageddon came out. Two big movies about asteroids coming to earth, but each told the story in a very different way.

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2003 9:32 pm
by Jack
I think that if they go ahead with releasing both films at once, it will take a chunk out of both of 'ems gross - that's the just the way it goes. Of course, it'll effect Sharkslayer far more than Incredibles, but both of them will at least be a little effected.

As for Ice Age, I agree that the story and a lot of the sequences were unoriginal, but I own it simply for the fact that I laughed out loud in several spots - and I've never laughed out loud in Pixar's films.

Yes, Pixars films are so darn whitty and humurous. They always put a smile on my face and make me giggle.

But when Sid started doing the slow-mo football parody with the mellon and then ended up splattering it at the end, I just laughed so hard. That, and a few other spots made me laugh (I can't remember the others, I haven't seen the film in a while.)

Anyways, I agree Pixar is far better than PDI Dreakworks' films.