DVDizzy Forum

Miley's 9-year-old sister launching a lingerie line for kids

Seems like every time we hear about Noah Cyrus she's doing something totally innapropriate for her age.

Whether it's dressing like a dominatrix for Halloween, skipping around a pole-dancing pole or performing the totally un-PG hits 'Smack That' and 'Tik Tok', we suspect this nine-year-old could easily notch up more scandals than her big sis by the time she hits her teens. [...]

We weep for the future.

From: http://celebrities.ninemsn.com.au/blog. ... ue&rss=yes





Boy oh boy, their parents must be so proud of their little sluts... er... girls.

Sexualizing little girls? Is this now what father Cyrus makes money off? Whoring up his 9 year old daughter? What a douchebag.

Seriously, which parents dress their 9 year old like that? Why not just move next door to a pedophile and leave the window open at night?

Whatever happened to letting kids be kids?

Is this really for real? Usually I can detect a joke, but this seems a bit much for joking!!

No parent should be dumb enough to let their kid trod around like this! Look at the amount of make-up she's wearing! What is this teaching her!!!! Why do kids need lingerie????????????????? This blows my mind.

Well, this wasn't a joke either:

enigmawing wrote:[...] As I was browsing Wal-mart the other day, I noticed a shirt in the girls' clothing section that felt out of place. And when I say girls' clothing section, I'm talking about grade school girls. And upon further inspection, I realized it was part of the Miley Cyrus line.



Really, I know it's just a print on a shirt, but does this really feel appropriate for little girls to wear? Is it something you'd buy for your eight or ten-year-old daughter?

Oh, God I think somebody ought to call Social Services on the Cyrus family.

LEAVE THE CYRUS FAMILY ALONE!!!!!.... jk :D:P!

I cannot believe how bad this is! And to think the father is allowing this to happen! What the hell is this!?!?!? How old is this girl, like 10, and she wants to act twice her age! But I don't think that this is true that they're making a lingerie line:

http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/ce ... e-for-kids

Although what they talk about doesn't sound good either.I remember at her age I still thought girls had couties! For all I know they still do

Hah, this reminds me of the South Park episode "Stupid Spoiled Whore Video Playset", in which Paris Hilton visits South Park and opens her own store, and all the little girls want to become little whores.

Maybe Mr. Slave should pay a visit to the Cyrus family...

Money > What's best for the little girls.

Oh. My. God!

Wow! How PG-13 of her.

Then again her last name is Cyrus - so this stuff doesn't really come as a surprise to me. However that doesn't change the fact that it's wrong on so many levels.

I withdraw judgement.

Back in the 30s, there was this radio dramaticization of H. G. Wells' "War of the World." People heard it, believe the martians were real, and the country went wack-o!

Why do I bring this up? Because it shows how paranoid people can become when they DON'T DO RESEARCH.

This new Noah Cyrus "lingerie" line? It's just TUTU dresses!!!!! i.e., the same stuff that Ooh la la Couture has been selling for years! People like Perez Hilton have completely blown this thing out of proportion, as they find delight in ruining the lives of certain female celebrities.

I agree that young girls should not dress sexy, but looking on the other side of the coin, how come nobody sees anything wrong with BOYS dressing like gang members, wearing T shirts with obscene words and grotesque images all over them????!! Why is the entire media so one-gender-sided?!?!?
(Hmm, maybe someone should start a new discussion thread on this one...)

And that is why I withdrew judgement.

Unfortunately, it's still a boys world. women just live in it.

no matter what they call it it's disturbing to dress young girls like 25 yr. old women.

The words lingerie and kids do not belong in the same sentence, unless of course that sentence is this:

The lingerie Rebecca wore during happy-naked-fun-time is responsible for the houseful of kids she now has.

Has anyone noticed that the kid on the right, on the botttom right pic, is swearing? Haha, classy!

Well, at least tolerance might finally go up in a gen. or two.

Enchantress wrote:Has anyone noticed that the kid on the right, on the botttom right pic, is swearing? Haha, classy!

She had two fingers up, not one.



Anyway this reminds me of a show my mother and I saw on tv couple days ago:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q1HRfy4xxko&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q1HRfy4xxko&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

I'm surprised that I'm not surprised by this...

Babaloo wrote:But I don't think that this is true that they're making a lingerie line:

http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/ce ... e-for-kids

"Page not found".

I know there's been press releases of the company that produces the clothes, saying that it's not "lingerie". It's a form of damage control after the backlash they've received. However, the costumes these press releases describe match the outfits shown in the photo's *exactly*. They're just distancing themselves of the term "lingerie" and think that will make it all all-right.

I must say, Billy Ray Cyrus is a real low-life to sell his daughters like this. When Miley was photographed 'provocatively' by Ann Leibowitz, I thought it was harmless and tastefull, as a work of art. But since Miley's poledancing and now this, I can't say a good word about him.

KennethE wrote:This new Noah Cyrus "lingerie" line? It's just TUTU dresses!!!!! i.e., the same stuff that Ooh la la Couture has been selling for years! People like Perez Hilton have completely blown this thing out of proportion, as they find delight in ruining the lives of certain female celebrities.

Look at those photo's. Do those look like "tutu dresses" to you? And why the hell is that 9 year old wearing make-up that makes her look like a 40 year old?

KennethE wrote:I agree that young girls should not dress sexy, but looking on the other side of the coin, how come nobody sees anything wrong with BOYS dressing like gang members, wearing T shirts with obscene words and grotesque images all over them????!! Why is the entire media so one-gender-sided?!?!?

Who says that nobody sees anything wrong with that? I think a lot of people think that's totally wrong. But they're not the point of discussion here. We're now talking about young girls being sexualized. And I hate it to have to say "but I think this-and-that is wrong tóó" every time I'm talking about a certain subject. Let's not divert attention from Billy Cyrus dressing up his 9 year old like she's a sexual object. And let's not forget he did it with Miley too.

Super Aurora wrote:

Enchantress wrote:Has anyone noticed that the kid on the right, on the botttom right pic, is swearing? Haha, classy!

She had two fingers up, not one.

I've been told, in the UK that's the same as giving 'the finger'.

I always thought it was some other country that's offended by two fingers.