DVDizzy Forum

It's been fun having some films in 3D the past couple of years but now it seems like it's being run into the ground. It seems to me they're turning it into an overdone gimmick instead of the cool novelty that it was. It seems to be loosing it's fun. What do you think about this? Does it feel this way to you?

I think it's something we will just see more often. That will mean it will lose it's novelty, but I really don't think it's a gimmick. As Avatar shows, it can be used in a way that's not gimmicky, and I'm sure more movies will follow that pattern.

Yes. This too shall pass. It's only a matter of time before people get tired of paying extra to wear glasses, especially if given a choice to see a movie in the same theater in 2-D. Ooh, layers of depth. Big deal. I'm already over it.

Personally, I find 3D highly annoying. I would rather watch something in 2D. I think the whole 3D phase will pass with time.

I never liked 3D no matter how hard I tried. It never interested me and I really hate those glasses. I wear glasses so I have to choose not see the movie as clearly as I want or 3D. It is so annoying I really think it is just a harmless gimmick. I am mad that 3D is all the time know. I just hate it hate it hate it. I am happy that it is being run down so we never have to endure 3D again because I am quite sick of it.

Definitely, whether it'll stay is another question, but now Sony is even talking about upgrading their older live-action movies to 3D. Animated movies I can see, but older live-action movies that weren't made for/in 3D - I don't know about that.

I'm kinda sick off 3D, it makes me dizzy and naucious, even without those damn glasses. I don't even know what the fuss is all about - so the objects come flying at you... from what I've seen/heard, the appropriate response seems to be: woohoo?

I blame that crappylicious third Spy Kids movie, just because I can...

Well, 3-D isn't TERRIBLE, it' just that sometimes, the colors are less faded out. It makes for a really cool depth experience, but it is being overused lately. Even Pixar has fell victim to it!

It will last awhile yet. Another year probably. Then it will fade out until they find a way to do 3D without glasses. I like it, but I'm not interested enough to pay the extra couple bucks for it.

zackiellovedisney, I wear the glasses over the glasses I wear to see the picture the most clearly. I'm sure you can do it, too! They are big enough to fit over another pair of glasses!

Yes. Yes they are.

I'm not a fan, and yes its being overused right now.

As much as I like 3D, i wouldnt count on me or anyone else just seeing 3D movies. it'll pass. Will the theaters keep the equipment? yes. They spent a lot on it. But it will likely just find it's niche in formerly-Imax exclusive 3D films, and Robert Rodriguez.

SmartAleck25 wrote:Well, 3-D isn't TERRIBLE, it' just that sometimes, the colors are less faded out. It makes for a really cool depth experience, but it is being overused lately. Even Pixar has fell victim to it!

Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the only 3D Pixar features were Up and the Toy Story double feature.

There not running it into the ground as long as people want to see it, and based on Avatar (and others, but especially Avatar) people do want to see it.

I've no doubt that come 2011 or 2012 it will be run into the ground though. That's what happens to all fads and I see the current 3D fad as being the same as the 50s and 80s 3D fads. I will admit though this fad seems stronger than the last two.

2099net wrote:There not running it into the ground as long as people want to see it, and based on Avatar (and others, but especially Avatar) people do want to see it.

I've no doubt that come 2011 or 2012 it will be run into the ground though. That's what happens to all fads and I see the current 3D fad as being the same as the 50s and 80s 3D fads. I will admit though this fad seems stronger than the last two.

They're working on systems for home viewing, so I think 3D will stay a while.

Yes, but I see home 3D more of a fad than movies to be honest. I can understand 3D appealing on a big screen (especially IMAX). But, I can't really see much appeal on a home system.

Even with a big screen TV, it will still not look as immersive or real. It will be like looking in a doll's house. Is that what people really want? And will people really want to watch TV for hours on end with expensive glasses? What if a pair breaks? What if you have extra people over for a viewing? It just seems impractical to me (until perhaps the leticular type 3D screens become more of a reality which don't require glasses - but even then you have to view the screen at the correct angle - something not really possible for family viewing)

I think 3D home display's only future is in videogaming to be honest, not video/tv/sports.

You know, not everybody has a HD TV today. Manufacturers would be better off selling people THOSE than sending out a mixed message by starting to sell 3D sets. How many people now will [a] consider HD an "intermediate step" and not bother to upgrade their TV until 3D set prices come down?

The manufacturers are doing themselves no favours what-so-ever.

rs_milo_whatever wrote:

SmartAleck25 wrote:Well, 3-D isn't TERRIBLE, it' just that sometimes, the colors are less faded out. It makes for a really cool depth experience, but it is being overused lately. Even Pixar has fell victim to it!

Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the only 3D Pixar features were Up and the Toy Story double feature.

Well, yeah, but aren't all of the future Pixar flicks going to be in Disney Digital 3-D?

SmartAleck25 wrote:

rs_milo_whatever wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the only 3D Pixar features were Up and the Toy Story double feature.

Well, yeah, but aren't all of the future Pixar flicks going to be in Disney Digital 3-D?

Only Until/when the demand and fad ends....

and 3D now is much better than those horrid red blue glasses....ow they use to hurt your eye if you wernt careful...

however....I think they are zapping 3D on everything too much....I mean....just because its in 3D does not make it a blockbuster worthy film....I admit I will see some in 3D but not every single film that has the availability of 3D.......and I much agree with Lazario's simple post answer of yes...yes they are....

Next thing you know they are going to put Little Fockers film in 3D....just what we need a Meet The Parents franchise Film i 3D...of course when I told my dad about 3D Titanic he said heck yeah....although I don't think he was thinking of the 3d effect of ship thinking if you know what I mean

disneyboy20022 wrote:of course when I told my dad about 3D Titanic he said heck yeah....although I don't think he was thinking of the 3d effect of ship thinking if you know what I mean

3D boobs!

Now that I think of it, porn in 3D could be interesting

sotiris2006 wrote:Now that I think of it, porn in 3D could be interesting

Just when I wanted to start a rant against 3D, you give me the one convincing argument to pursuade me!