DVDizzy Forum

Don't know if this has ever been a discussion topic here before, so I guess I should bring it up.

Have a film you think should get the popular HD remastering (and no, it doesn't only have to be animation or Disney)? Post your list of films that deserve the Blu-ray High-Def treatment that have yet to get one.

For me, it's these films:

The Iron Giant (1999)
The Secret of NIMH (1982)
JAWS (1975)
The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974)
West Side Story (1961)
The Prince of Egypt (1998)
Psycho (1960)
Vertigo (1958)
The Birds (1963)
Mary Poppins (1964). Come on, Disney, this is a Blu-Ray essential!
The Producers (1967 & 2005)
The Emperor's New Groove (2000). It's just too fun. If Monsters, Inc. can get it, so can TENG..
The Rescuers Down Under (1990)
Pee Wee's Big Adventure (1985). No, I'm not kidding. Have you SEEN this film? Drop-dead funny. Rotten Tomatoes even gave it a 100% score.

Well, what do YOU think should get the HD makeover?

AND PLEASE; I'M BEGGING YOU ALL. Don't turn this into one of those "Screw Blu-ray, DVD's are fine for me" topics. I chose Blu-ray simply because of the true Cinematic experience you get out of the darn disc. Yes, DVD's can do the same... but Blu-ray does it better.

I really don't think any of these films are going to be lacking a Blu-ray release for too long, really... it's not like any of them are really some obscure unknown films that only a handful of people know about.

SpringHeelJack wrote:I really don't think any of these films are going to be lacking a Blu-ray release for too long, really... it's not like any of them are really some obscure unknown films that only a handful of people know about.

Yeah, I was kind of aware of that when I wrote the topic. But come on, Blu-ray's been out for about 3 years already, and not a word has been said on ANY of the films I mentioned. Plus, I never said they weren't going to get a release, I just said they've YET to get one.

I would love for these to be released in gorgeous HD! Especially the first 3!!!

The Little Mermaid (1989)
Marie Antoinette (2006)
The Virgin Suicides (1999)
Hercules (1997)
Finding Nemo (2003)
Showgirls (1995)
Jackie Brown (1997)
Jawbreaker (1999)
The Sound of Music (1965)
The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975)
Princess Mononoke (1997)
KiKi's Delivery Service (1989)
Clueless (1995)
Romy & Michele's High School Reunion (1997)
Madonna's Sticky & Sweet Tour : Live in Buenos Aires
Madonna's Re:Invention Tour : Live in Lisbon

Seeing as "South Pacific" has made a spectacular debut on Blu-ray, we need the other Rodgers & Hammerstein musicals asap.

Cordy_Biddle wrote:Seeing as "South Pacific" has made a spectacular debut on Blu-ray, we need the other Rodgers & Hammerstein musicals asap.

I agree! Any other musicals would be great also.
Any DAC.
The rest of the Pixar library.
Charlie Brown specials/movies

Cordy_Biddle wrote:Seeing as "South Pacific" has made a spectacular debut on Blu-ray, we need the other Rodgers & Hammerstein musicals asap.

We need one of the film versions that isn't lousy... I bet they'll sit on "Sound of Music" for a while, but I'd like "The King and I".

TonyWDA wrote:

SpringHeelJack wrote:I really don't think any of these films are going to be lacking a Blu-ray release for too long, really... it's not like any of them are really some obscure unknown films that only a handful of people know about.

Yeah, I was kind of aware of that when I wrote the topic. But come on, Blu-ray's been out for about 3 years already, and not a word has been said on ANY of the films I mentioned.

Well...actually there even some films yet to make it to even DVD and its been out for what nearly a decade...

Where to start?:

-Star Wars (I-VI, Ewok Adventrures, and Clone Wars Micro Series)
-The Evil Dead
-Phantasm (I-IV)
-Halloween (II-8)
-Friday The 13th (IV-X)
-A Nightmare On Elm Street (I-VII)
-Freaked
-The Pink Panther (Original Blake Edwards sequels including Inspector Clouseau)
-Toy Story (I-II)
-Shrek (I-II)
-Who Framed Roger Rabbit (Under the Disney label)
-The Thief and The Cobbler
-Mallrats
-Hellraiser (II and III for now)
-George A. Romero's Night Of The Living Dead)
-Return Of The Living Dead (Part 1 for now)
-Bubba Ho-Tep
-BASEketball
-Suspiria
-Inferno
-The Breakfast Club
-Back To The Future (I-III)
-Indiana Jones (I-III)
-Family Guy Presents Blue Harvest
-Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film For Theaters
-Sixteen Candles
-House On Haunted Hill (Original)
-Bad Taste
-Dead Alive
-Night Of The Living Dead (1990 remake)
-Child's Play (2-Seed Of Chucky)
-Hatchet
-Killer Klowns From Outer Space
-Ghostbusters 2
-The Producers (Original and Remake)
-Over The Hedge
-The Spongebob Squarepants Movie
-Charlie Brown Specials
-The Emperor's New Groove
-Halloweentown (I-IV)

That's probably it.

Yeah, basically:

Don Bluth Films
Miyazaki Films
Disney Renaissance Films
Dreamworks Animation 2D Films
Hitchcock Films
Spielberg Films

There's more but that covers all big ones. Hitchcock looks promising with North by Northwest coming out next month, same with Miyazaki with Ponyo and rumored others

disneyboy20022 wrote:Well...actually there even some films yet to make it to even DVD and its been out for what nearly a decade...

So true, though I doubt many people are scrambling to see Ishtar on DVD. But still, there are some movies that I'm still impatiently waiting to see turn up on DVD, like The Mating Season, The Sword and the Rose, The Magnificent Ambersons (though that's understandable given that Warner is still looking for the best source material), Johnny Guitar, Wings... And there's even some movies that have never even hit VHS or laserdisc yet. Then again, I doubt Peter Bogdanovich really wants anyone to see At Long Last Love.

Anyway, I'm sure all the high-profile titles will get Blu-Ray releases within the next few years.

The main movie that I am really really really excited for once it hits Blu-Ray is The Ten Commandments.

albert

Escapay wrote:

disneyboy20022 wrote:Well...actually there even some films yet to make it to even DVD and its been out for what nearly a decade...

So true, though I doubt many people are scrambling to see Ishtar on DVD. But still, there are some movies that I'm still impatiently waiting to see turn up on DVD, like The Mating Season, The Sword and the Rose, The Magnificent Ambersons (though that's understandable given that Warner is still looking for the best source material), Johnny Guitar, Wings... And there's even some movies that have never even hit VHS or laserdisc yet. Then again, I doubt Peter Bogdanovich really wants anyone to see At Long Last Love.

Anyway, I'm sure all the high-profile titles will get Blu-Ray releases within the next few years.

The main movie that I am really really really excited for once it hits Blu-Ray is The Ten Commandments.

albert

A few of the movies you mentioned are on DVD...albeit outside of the States..."Magnificent Ambersons" and "Johnny Guitar" among them... Sometimes it pays to invest in a multi-region player.

I'll break my list down into Disney and non-Disney, and I won't include titles that have already been formally announced ala Disney's Diamond Collection or indirectly announced ala Back to the Future:

Disney:
Alice in Wonderland
The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh
The Hunchback of Notre Dame
Aladdin
Finding Nemo
Lilo & Stitch
The Emperor's New Groove
Tarzan
Bedknobs and Broomsticks
Mary Poppins
Pollyanna
The Parent Trap (both 1961 and 1998)
James and the Giant Peach
Return to Oz
The Santa Clause
Song of the South

Non-Disney:
Meet Me in St. Louis
Singin' in the Rain
Rear Window
The Ten Commandments
Psycho
King of Kings
The Birds
Marnie
Funny Girl
All Charlie Brown Specials
Jesus Christ Superstar
The Slipper and the Rose
Jesus of Nazareth
The Star Wars Trilogy
The Indiana Jones Trilogy
Annie (1982)
Kiki's Delivery Service
Matilda
Spirited Away
Peter Pan (2003)
The Nativity Story
The Golden Compass: Director's Cut

Well, basically my favorite films-

Mary Poppins
The Sound of Music
Ben-Hur
The Little Mermaid
Victor/Victoria

Of course, the only three I could see coming out in the near future is TSOM, because it's forty-fifth anniversary's next year, and Ben-Hur, because I swear I remember reading a report that it was being remastered in time for a BD release. I think V/V really just deserves a more decent home video release than the DVD. At least a nice, decked-out 2-Disc DVD.

Disneykid wrote:Song of the South

This just needs released, period. DVD or Blu or digital, I don't care it just needs acknowledged and released to the public (preferably restored).

PixarFan2006 wrote:King Kong (1933)

Well, Warner had a pamphlet that came with the Poltergeist last year that had King Kong as a Blu release for this year. I guess they changed their minds. This is my favorite film and I have the collector's tin. The extra's on the current set are perfect but the PQ sucks. I understand why the grain is so thick and the picture sometimes lacks clarity, 30's film stock sucks and optical F/X shots reduced clarity, but there is no excuse for the scratches, dust/dirt and flickering that is all throughout the movie. I'm hoping it was delayed because they are taking their time with it and giving it the treatment they gave Oz.

jpanimation wrote: Well, Warner had a pamphlet that came with the Poltergeist last year that had King Kong as a Blu release for this year. I guess they changed their minds. This is my favorite film and I have the collector's tin. The extra's on the current set are perfect but the PQ sucks. I understand why the grain is so thick and the picture sometimes lacks clarity, 30's film stock sucks and optical F/X shots reduced clarity, but there is no excuse for the scratches, dust/dirt and flickering that is all throughout the movie. I'm hoping it was delayed because they are taking their time with it and giving it the treatment they gave Oz.

A treatment like the one given to Oz probably isn't going to help Kong. The original negative cannot be found, so all they've got to work with is a third generation dupe print. So unless the ON is found, the Blu-ray is going to look very similar to the dvd. But does a 30s film really have to be scratch free? It has its charms.

KubrickFan wrote:A treatment like the one given to Oz probably isn't going to help Kong. The original negative cannot be found, so all they've got to work with is a third generation dupe print. So unless the ON is found, the Blu-ray is going to look very similar to the dvd. But does a 30s film really have to be scratch free? It has its charms.

Personally, yes, I hate imperfections on old films and don't consider it charming. In-fact, I can't stand grain either but put up with it for the sake of film detail (I hope in the future they have tech that can remove it without washing out the detail). I doubt the original directors wanted the grain and imperfection but put up with it because thats all they had. The only people who purposely want that are probably horror directors.

Anyways, sorry for the rant that wasn't aimed at you. I think the print should still look better than it is. Singin' in the Rain has no negative and it looks fantastic and I understand the Kong print from Britain was well kept. Its my favorite film and I get a little worked up when discussing it.

jpanimation wrote: Personally, yes, I hate imperfections on old films and don't consider it charming. In-fact, I can't stand grain either but put up with it for the sake of film detail (I hope in the future they have tech that can remove it without washing out the detail). I doubt the original directors wanted the grain and imperfection but put up with it because thats all they had. The only people who purposely want that are probably horror directors.

Anyways, sorry for the rant that wasn't aimed at you. I think the print should still look better than it is. Singin' in the Rain has no negative and it looks fantastic and I understand the Kong print from Britain was well kept. Its my favorite film and I get a little worked up when discussing it.

And some directors then would've preferred to shoot in color and/or widescreen, and I don't want anybody to cut up a film or colorize it.
I hope they would just leave the grain intact. It was there to begin with, and many directors and DPs use it as an artistic way, instead of treating it as an imperfection. Steven Spielberg's movies contain quite heavy grain. So it's not just horror directors.

KubrickFan wrote:

jpanimation wrote: Well, Warner had a pamphlet that came with the Poltergeist last year that had King Kong as a Blu release for this year. I guess they changed their minds. This is my favorite film and I have the collector's tin. The extra's on the current set are perfect but the PQ sucks. I understand why the grain is so thick and the picture sometimes lacks clarity, 30's film stock sucks and optical F/X shots reduced clarity, but there is no excuse for the scratches, dust/dirt and flickering that is all throughout the movie. I'm hoping it was delayed because they are taking their time with it and giving it the treatment they gave Oz.

A treatment like the one given to Oz probably isn't going to help Kong. The original negative cannot be found, so all they've got to work with is a third generation dupe print. So unless the ON is found, the Blu-ray is going to look very similar to the dvd. But does a 30s film really have to be scratch free? It has its charms.

Didn't Warners use a British print source for the DVD of "King Kong"? I recall them saying it was the most complete, intact print they believed existed for the film.