I really hate it when people try to demonize poor Mickey like that.xxhplinkxx wrote:How I feel:
Doing that is just plain wrong, IMO.
That's hilarious! I love Belle and Beast, and the Mr. Fantastic and Elastigirl stretching neck competition!blackcauldron85 wrote:A Marvel-meets-Disney picture:
"Epic Misney" by T Campbell and John Waltrip
http://www.tcampbell.net/john/
(via cartoonbrew.com)
I think WDWlocal was actually commenting on the fact that someone drew an evil Mickey rather than the fact that Disney bought Marvel.BDF wrote:Well, that's a Disney purist for you. People think that Disney should never, never, never, ever, ever purchase anything.
blackcauldron85 wrote:A Marvel-meets-Disney picture:
"Epic Misney" by T Campbell and John Waltrip
http://www.tcampbell.net/john/
(via cartoonbrew.com)
My favorites....in the pictureblackcauldron85 wrote:A Marvel-meets-Disney picture:
"Epic Misney" by T Campbell and John Waltrip
http://www.tcampbell.net/john/
(via cartoonbrew.com)
Exactly.Escapay wrote:I think WDWlocal was actually commenting on the fact that someone drew an evil Mickey rather than the fact that Disney bought Marvel.
Just because Disney buys properties from other companies does not mean that Disney is becoming lazy and unimaginative.Big Disney Fan wrote:Well, that's a Disney purist for you. People think that Disney should never, never, never, ever, ever purchase anything.
It's just like what David Koenig said in "Mouse Under Glass". He wrote about Disney purists accusing Imagineers of becoming "lazy and unimaginative", when they made deals with George Lucas and others about acquiring their properties to use in the Disney parks and said that Walt would never have bought the Muppets; he would've created his own characters.
Because teenagers like comic-book movies, and because it's already become a recent hit- if people are currently interested in the property, then they're more likely to want to see the movie (or TV show)!and up-and-coming ones such as the Runaways, a street-savvy pack of teenagers that have become a recent Marvel comic-book hit.
So that means that these would be all-new characters, right? Would they probably get their own comic book series first, to introduce people to the property, or just start making TV shows or movies with the characters?Disney would benefit the most from new characters that Disney and Marvel develop together because the company would own the franchises outright instead of simply receiving licensing fees from the movies that Sony Corp. and News Corp.'s Fox produce on their own. Those deals last until Sony and Fox stop making the movies. New characters could also be a boon for fans who are tiring of sequels.