US vs UK TV discussion
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 11:16 am
I've been thinking for a while now about the differences between UK and US television. There are cultural differences as expected (compare our UK Soaps – which are insanely popular – to your US soaps and there's a whole difference in style, approach and intent). But that's not really got me thinking.
What got me thinking was season/series runs. It's pretty much given any show in the US is going to have around 22 episodes if it goes the full season, and around 13 if it is a mid-season show, or pulled. I know some shows are pulled before they reach 13 episodes, but the intent obviously is not to be pulled!
But in the UK, most shows have between 6 and 8 episodes. Sometimes 13 (as Doctor Who does, but really this is just for US sales reasons). Sometimes, like with Doctor Who, we give a show a rest for a year or two and then bring it back.
So my question is… do you think that its better to have long runs or short runs?
Personally, although I'm sometimes wanting more, I think I prefer short runs. Mainly because you're left "wanting more" if you like the show, and if you don't like the show, its soon over and something new will be on in its place.
The number of British shows that I liked, and then got fed up with I can count on the fingers of one hand (although there's a few more I have a more complex emotional relationship with).
But there's loads of US shows that I grew tired of for various reasons.
Some like Lost, Invasion, Desperate Housewives just go on too long. Spreading a drama out over 22 episodes (so around 16 hours) really does make the drama suffer if its not done well enough. Would anyone here pay to see a 16 hour movie, or would you expect it to be overlong?
Others (especially comedies) I just get fed-up with, especially if they tend to follow the same-ish formula. I used to love Will and Grace, but soon got fed up with it around the middle of the second season. I even got fed up with Friends. On the other hand, Fawlty Towers for example only had 12 episodes and each one is a masterpiece. I would have loved Life on Mars to continue, but it was always a concept with a definitive beginning and end, and stretching the middle would only have weakened the ending when it did come (and boy, it was a fantastic ending).
The general thought process in the UK is to "go out on top" where as in the US, the general thought process seems to be to continue something if its popular.
But of course there's shows over here I wish had 22 episode runs, and there's shows in the US that I didn't tire of (such as the always excellent Joan of Arcadia).
What got me thinking was season/series runs. It's pretty much given any show in the US is going to have around 22 episodes if it goes the full season, and around 13 if it is a mid-season show, or pulled. I know some shows are pulled before they reach 13 episodes, but the intent obviously is not to be pulled!
But in the UK, most shows have between 6 and 8 episodes. Sometimes 13 (as Doctor Who does, but really this is just for US sales reasons). Sometimes, like with Doctor Who, we give a show a rest for a year or two and then bring it back.
So my question is… do you think that its better to have long runs or short runs?
Personally, although I'm sometimes wanting more, I think I prefer short runs. Mainly because you're left "wanting more" if you like the show, and if you don't like the show, its soon over and something new will be on in its place.
The number of British shows that I liked, and then got fed up with I can count on the fingers of one hand (although there's a few more I have a more complex emotional relationship with).
But there's loads of US shows that I grew tired of for various reasons.
Some like Lost, Invasion, Desperate Housewives just go on too long. Spreading a drama out over 22 episodes (so around 16 hours) really does make the drama suffer if its not done well enough. Would anyone here pay to see a 16 hour movie, or would you expect it to be overlong?
Others (especially comedies) I just get fed-up with, especially if they tend to follow the same-ish formula. I used to love Will and Grace, but soon got fed up with it around the middle of the second season. I even got fed up with Friends. On the other hand, Fawlty Towers for example only had 12 episodes and each one is a masterpiece. I would have loved Life on Mars to continue, but it was always a concept with a definitive beginning and end, and stretching the middle would only have weakened the ending when it did come (and boy, it was a fantastic ending).
The general thought process in the UK is to "go out on top" where as in the US, the general thought process seems to be to continue something if its popular.
But of course there's shows over here I wish had 22 episode runs, and there's shows in the US that I didn't tire of (such as the always excellent Joan of Arcadia).