Page 1 of 2
WARNING! The Rescuers Thread: Beware!
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 5:31 pm
by Tangela
This thread is to discuss an Einster Era Disney Lie. Since I don't believe a word the Disney Company says.
I'm not sure if its really a lie, but I wouldn't trust them. The lie is "The Images were included in original 1977 theatrical release" You know the Rescuers 1999 release video recall and then reissue thingie. They spect me to believe that the original team of Disney's animators would do this, uh huh,
Yeah right! And also "The images were not included in the 1992 version because it was made from a different print." Sure!
Anything they say is to defend themselves and keep their money. Has anyone proved that the images were there in the 1977 version? With all that record of liers. M. Einster would do anything for money or to gain respect, well, from my side, he's lost all the respect, I feel sick everytime I see his stupid face. I believe that the two images were placed into the film just before the 1999 release, besides it seems very interesting that it was them who discovered the frames, I mean you really have to know they're there to see them, I don't think they just decided to view the film frame-by-frame...
What do you guys think? Am I confusing anybody?
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 5:49 pm
by Luke
You're confusing me.
What's lye got to do with it?
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 6:00 pm
by Tangela
I knew I was a bit confusing. Well, I think the lie is that the two inappropiate images were inserted into the film before the 1999 release but not in the 1977 version. I mean if you look at the facts it is just too obvious:
The Images were in the 1999 release but not in the 1992 one.
They were discovered buy the modern company, you really have to know they were there to find them, I think they knew.
No one has ever proved that the images were in the original theatrical release.
So, my guess is that someone in the modern times Disney Company did it, not some jealous post-producer back in 1977.
Do you understand now Luke? What my point is...
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 6:06 pm
by catNC
the lye will be used to make soap to "clean" up the inappropriate images in the newer home video release??
we made lye soap in chemistry class in high school, and it blew up in my face.. and that's no LIE
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 6:16 pm
by Tangela
Alright! How the heck do you spell "not the truth"?
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 6:21 pm
by RoyalNatalie
To '
lie.'
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 7:33 pm
by STASHONE
damn that Einster!
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 7:37 pm
by Loomis
Luke wrote:You're confusing me.
What's lye got to do with it?
Wasn't that a Tina Turner song?
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 7:57 pm
by indianajdp
What the .....
Is it February already?
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 8:47 pm
by Tangela
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2003 10:33 am
by Maerj
Feel free to smoke if ya got em! This thread has been dooby-rific!
Lost Point
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:03 pm
by FOXSTAR
Will did you look in the lost and found
Foxstar
Re: WARNING! The Rescuers Thread: Beware!
Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2004 11:36 pm
by Maerj
Tangela the Jellyroll wrote:This thread is to discuss an Einster Era Disney Lye. Since I don't believe a word the Disney Company says.
I'm not sure if its reelly a lye, but I wouldn't trust them. The lye is "The Images were included in original 1977 theatrical release" You know the Rescuers 1999 release video recall and then reissue thingie. They spect me to believe that the original team of Disney's animators would do this, uh huh,
Yeah right! And also "The images were not included in the 1992 version because it was made from a different print." Sure! And I own my own golf course!
Anything they say is to defend themselves and keep their money. Has anyone proved that the images were there in the 1977 version? With all that record of lyers. M. Einster would do anything for money or to gain respect, well, from my side, he's lost all the respect, I feel sick everytime I see his stupid face. I believe that the two images were placed into the film just before the 1999 release, besides it seems very interesting that it was them who discovered the frames, I mean you really have to know they're there to see them, I don't think they just decided to view the film frame-by-frame like I have. I watch it over and over, frame by glorious frame.
What do you guys think? Am I smoking pot or just weird? Am I the real lyer?
Why don't we have good, intelligent discussions like this anymore? Why?
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 7:44 am
by Joe Carioca
Hey, Tangela... Disney is politically-correct... But that doesn't mean that all the artists within the corporation are.
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 7:56 am
by Uncle Remus
why does everyone keep complaining about the naughty frame in the rescuers? it is sorta a pointless topic to talk about over and over and over and over and......(20 minutes later)......over and over and over again. just face it. disney is never going to bring back the original rescuers that wasnt edited. so there is no use for this topic anymore.
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:14 pm
by Maerj
THAT'S what this thread was about? Oh okay, it was hard to tell. Nevermind then, everyone just move to the next unread post. Sorry for the inconvenience!
Re: WARNING! The Rescuers Thread: Beware!
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:22 pm
by Tangela
Maerj wrote:Tangela the Jellyroll wrote:This thread is to discuss an Einster Era Disney Lye. Since I don't believe a word the Disney Company says.
I'm not sure if its reelly a lye, but I wouldn't trust them. The lye is "The Images were included in original 1977 theatrical release" You know the Rescuers 1999 release video recall and then reissue thingie. They spect me to believe that the original team of Disney's animators would do this, uh huh,
Yeah right! And also "The images were not included in the 1992 version because it was made from a different print." Sure! And I own my own golf course!
Anything they say is to defend themselves and keep their money. Has anyone proved that the images were there in the 1977 version? With all that record of lyers. M. Einster would do anything for money or to gain respect, well, from my side, he's lost all the respect, I feel sick everytime I see his stupid face. I believe that the two images were placed into the film just before the 1999 release, besides it seems very interesting that it was them who discovered the frames, I mean you really have to know they're there to see them, I don't think they just decided to view the film frame-by-frame like I have. I watch it over and over, frame by glorious frame.
What do you guys think? Am I smoking pot or just weird? Am I the real lyer?
Why don't we have good, intelligent discussions like this anymore? Why?
Ok! I am so sick of this idiot, I'm sorry but this time I'm leaving and I'm leaving for good!!! I can't stand any more jokes from that stupid Maerj. Goodbye!!!! You really got me angry this time, "Terry"!!!!!!
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:27 pm
by Luke
Stop! Don't! Come back!
Surely someone who's brought so much humor to this forum as you, Tangela, should be able to recognize when someone is kidding.
You're angry, and anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. Nonetheless, there's no need to dish out names like "stupid" and "idiot" at other members. Thanks.
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:31 pm
by Maerj
LOL, you should see the PM I just got, there is worse language than that in it! But at least it was well written! Thanks!
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:43 pm
by Tangela
Maerj wrote:LOL, you should see the PM I just got, there is worse language than that in it! But at least it was well written! Thanks!
Well, you did get me really mad, you know!!!! So I couldn't help myself from writting those things to you, I told you a million times I don't like those jokes, even if you and Luke think they're funny. Then I mean to take the PM back but you had already seen it. So, I didn't mean those things, but at the same time, I did mean that you got me really upset.